Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:38:02.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INFLUENCE OF DIET ON REPELLENT AND FEEDING-DETERRENT ACTIVITY OF LARVAL ORAL EXUDATE IN SPRUCE BUDWORMS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L.M. Poirier*
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4
J.H. Borden
Affiliation:
Department of Forest Sciences, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4
*
1 Author to whom all corresponding should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A two-choice feeding bioassay was used to investigate the effects of larval source (colony versus wild larvae) and rearing medium (artificial versus foliar diet) on the feeding-deterrent activity of the oral exudate of the spruce budworm and the western spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) and Choristoneura occidentalis Free., respectively. Feeding by both wild and colony larvae was deterred by conspecific oral exudate. Larvae reared on artificial diet responded to exudate from both diet- and foliage-reared larvae, whereas the foliage-reared larvae responded only to exudate from other foliage-reared larvae. These results suggest that differences exist between artificial diet- and foliage-reared larvae in the composition of oral exudate, in the concentrations of its biologically active constituents, or in differential sensitivity of diet- and foliage-reared larvae to exudate from foliage-reared larvae.

Résumé

Une expérience d’alimentation à deux choix a servi à étudier les effets de la provenance des larves (colonie versus larves sauvages) et du milieu d’élevage (artificiel versus régime de feuilles) sur l’activité inhibitrice de l’alimentation des sécrétions orales de la Tordeuse des bourgeons de l’épinette, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), et de la Tordeuse occidentale de l’épinette, Choristoneura occidentalis Free. L’alimentation a été inhibée par les sécrétions orales d’individus conspécifiques, aussi bien chez les larves de la colonie que chez les larves sauvages. Les larves nourries du régime artificiel ont réagi aux sécrétions des larves nourries aux deux régime, mais les larves nourries de feuillage n’ont réagi qu’aux sécrétions d’autres larves nourries de feuillage. Ces résultats indiquent qu’il existe des différences dans la nature des sécrétions orales des larves nourries à un régime artificiel et celles des larves nourries de feuillage et dans les concentrations des composantes biologiquement actives de ces sécrétions; il existe également des différences dans la sensibilité de deux types de larves aux sécrétions des larves nourries de feuillage.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

References

Corbet, S.A. 1971. Mandibular gland secretion of larvae of the flour moth, Anagasta kuehniella, contains an epideictic pheromone and elicits oviposition movements in a hymenopteran parasite. Nature (London) 232: 481–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dethier, V.G., Browne, L.B., Smith, C.N. 1960. The designation of chemicals in terms of the responses they elicit from insects. Journal of Economic Entomology 53: 134–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisner, T., Johnessee, J.S., Carrel, J., Hendry, L.B., Meinwald, J. 1974. Defensive use by an insect of a plant resin. Science (Washington, DC) 184: 996–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, S.C., Johnson, N.D., LeGuyader, J.L. 1987. Defensive regurgitation of allelochemicals derived from host cyanogenesis by eastern tent caterpillars. Ecology 68: 1268–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, L.M. 1995. Bioactivity and characterization of spruce budworm larval oral exudate. Ph.D. thesis, Simon Fraser University, BurnabyGoogle Scholar
Poirier, L.M., Borden, J.H. 1995. Oral exudate as a mediator of behaviour in larval eastern and western spruce budworms (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Insect Behavior 8: 801–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poirier, L.M., Borden, J.H. 1996. Repellency of oral exudate to eastern and western spruce budworm larvae (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 22: 907–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prokopy, R.J. 1981. Epideictic pheromones that influence spacing patterns of phytophagous insects. pp 181213in Nordlund, D.A., Jones, R.L., Lewis, W.J. (Eds.), Semiochemicals: Their Role in Pest Control. New York: John Wiley and SonsGoogle Scholar
Schlotzhauer, S.D., Littell, R.C. 1987. SAS System for Elementary Statistical Analysis. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D., Torrie, J.H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biometrical Approach. Toronto: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar