Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:13:17.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE INFLUENCE OF APHID PREY CONSUMPTION ON SEARCHING BEHAVIOR, WEIGHT INCREASE, DEVELOPMENTAL TIME, AND MORTALITY OF CHRYSOPA CARNEA (NEUROPTERA: CHRYSOPIDAE) AND HIPPODAMIA CONVERGENS (COLEOPTERA: COCCINELLIDAE) LARVAE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. U. Baumgaertner ,
A. P. Gutierrez  and
C. G. Summers
J. U. Baumgaertner
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley 94720
A. P. Gutierrez
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley 94720
C. G. Summers
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The behavior of larval stages of the green lace wing, Chrysopa carnea Stephens, and of the ladybird beetle Hippodamia convergens G.-M. were studied in the laboratory. With increasing hunger level, only first instar H. convergens larvae spent more time searching in the upper part of alfalfa stems, where both prey aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and Acyrthosiphon kondoi (Shinji), are found. All larval instars tested except first instar C. carnea visited more stems per unit time with increasing hunger level. The weight gain, the developmental time, and the mortality of all larvae were adversely influenced at low food levels, but differently for each predator size and species. C. carnea larvae had higher rates of fat body utilization and weight gain than coccinellid larvae.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 11 , November 1981 , pp. 1007 - 1014
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, G. D. and Ritchie, P. L.. 1970. Development of Chrysopa carnea at constant and fluctuating temperatures. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1028–1030.Google Scholar
Butler, G. D. and Dickerson, W. A.. 1972. Life cycle of the convergent lady beetle in relation to temperature. J. econ. Ent. 65: 1508–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. 1959. An experimental study of the searching behaviour of the predatory coccinellid beetle Adalia decempunctata (L.). J. anim. Ecol. 28: 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazer, B. D. and Gilbert, N.. 1976. Coccinellids and aphids: A quantitative study of the impact of adult ladybirds (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) preying on field populations of pea aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 73: 33–56.Google Scholar
Gilbert, N., Gutierrez, A. P., Frazer, B. D., and Jones, R. E.. 1976. Ecological Relationships. W. H. Freeman, Reading and San Francisco. 157 pp.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P., Baumgaertner, J. U., and Hagen, K. S.. 1981. A conceptual model for growth, development, and reproduction in the ladybird beetle, Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Can. Ent. 113: 21–33.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, A. P., Summers, C. G., and Baumgaertner, J.. 1980. The phenology and distribution of aphids in California alfalfa as modified by ladybird beetle predation (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae). Can. Ent. 112: 489–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P. 1978. The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Monographs in Population Biology 13. Princeton Univ. Press. 237 pp.Google Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 48. 86 pp.Google Scholar
Jennrich, R. J. 1977. Nonlinear Regression. pp. 464–483in Dixon, W. J. (Series Ed.), Brown, M. B. (Ed. 1977 ed.), BMDP-77. Biomedical Computer Programs. P-Series. Univ. California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.Google Scholar
Neuenschwander, P., Hagen, K. S., and Smith, R. F.. 1975. Predation on aphids in California's alfalfa fields. Hilgardia 43(2): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royama, T. 1971. A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Researches popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 13 (Suppl. 1). 91 pp.Google Scholar
Simpson, R. G. and Burkhardt, C. C.. 1960. Biology and evaluation of certain predators of Therioaphis maculata (Buckton). J. econ. Ent. 53: 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundby, R. A. 1966. A comparative study of the efficiency of three predatory insects Coccinella septempunctata L. (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae), Chrysopa carnea St. (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) and Syrphus ribesii L. (Diptera, Syrphidae) at two different temperatures. Entomophaga 11: 395–404.Google Scholar
Thoeni, H. 1970. Die Schätzung von Wachstumskurven aufgrund wiederholter Messungen am gleichen Individuum. 1. Gemischtes Modell für lineare Regression. Schweiz. landw. Forsch. 1: 54–67.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. 1974. Biostatistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.620 pp.Google Scholar