Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:25:52.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improved sugar delivery onto pesticide-treated spheres for controlling Rhagoletis pomonella (Diptera: Tephritidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Ronald J. Prokopy ,
Bradley W. Chandler  and
Starker E. Wright
Ronald J. Prokopy*
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States of America
Bradley W. Chandler
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States of America
Starker E. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, United States of America
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2002, we evaluated the performance of imidacloprid-treated spheres topped by newly developed, rodent-protected, sugar/paraffin discs (that released sugar as needed, feeding stimulant onto the sphere surface) against apple maggot flies, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh). Commercial orchard plots (30 m × 30 m) surrounded by odor-baited, imidacloprid-treated, plastic spheres topped by 150-g discs (not replaced during the 12-week period of deployment) received no more immigrant adults or fruit injury than plots surrounded by odor-baited, imidacloprid-treated, wooden spheres topped by 50-g discs (replaced after 6 weeks), plots surrounded by odor-baited sticky-coated spheres, or plots sprayed two or three times with insecticide to control this insect. Approximately half of all apple maggot flies placed on imidacloprid-treated spheres not receiving additional sugar following retrieval from the plots died following exposure to spheres in the laboratory, irrespective of field-exposure duration (6, 9, or 12 weeks). Nearly all flies died when placed on orchard-exposed spheres that did receive additional sugar following retrieval. Future studies will aim at refining disc construction to ensure that all apple maggot flies alighting on imidacloprid-treated spheres will encounter feeding stimulant and be killed.

Résumé

En 2000, nous avons évalué la performance de sphères traitées à l'imidaclopride et recouvertes de disques de sucre/paraffine, nouvellement conçus et protégés contre les rongeurs, dans la lutte contre la mouche de la pomme, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh); les disques libèrent autant de sucre que nécessaire sur la surface de la sphère comme stimulant alimentaire. Des parcelles de vergers commerciaux (30 m × 30 m) entourées de sphères de plastique à appât odoriférant, traitées à l'imidaclopride et couvertes de disques de 150 g (non remplacés pendant les 12 semaines de l'expérience) n'ont pas reçu plus d'adultes immigrants, ni subi plus de dommage aux fruits que des parcelles entourées de sphères de bois à appât odoriférant, traitées à l'imidaclopride et couvertes de disques de 50 g (remplacés au bout de 6 semaines), ou des parcelles entourées de sphères à appât odoriférant couvertes de glu, ou encore des parcelles arrosées 2 ou 3 fois pour la lutte contre cet insecte. Environ la moitié des mouches placées sur des sphères traitées à imida clopride, sans avoir reçu de sucre après leur retrait des parcelles, sont mortes après avoir été exposées à des sphères au laboratoire, quelle que soit la durée de l'exposition de la sphère dans les vergers (6, 9 ou 12 semaines). Presque toutes les mouches placées sur des sphères exposées dans les vergers qui ont reçu du sucre additionnel après leur retrait du verger sont mortes. Les travaux futurs viseront à raffiner la construction des disques pour assurer que toutes les mouches qui se posent sur les sphères traitées à l'imidaclopride soient mises en présence du stimulant alimentaire et qu'elles soient éliminées.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 135 , Issue 6 , December 2003 , pp. 909 - 918
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayyappath, R., Polavarapu, S., McGuire, M.R. 2000. Effectiveness of thiamethoxam-coated spheres against blueberry maggot flies. Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 1473–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bostanian, N.J., Racette, G. 2001. Attract and kill, an effective technique to manage apple maggot in high density Quebec apple orchards. Phytoprotection 82: 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostanian, N.J., Vincent, C., Chouinard, G., Racette, G. 1999. Managing apple maggot by perimeter trapping. Phytoprotection 80: 21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drummond, F.E., Groden, E., Prokopy, R.J. 1984. Comparative efficacy and optimal positioning of traps for monitoring apple maggot flies. Environmental Entomology 13: 232–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, J.J., Prokopy, R.J. 1992. Visual and odor stimuli influencing effectiveness of sticky spheres for trapping apple maggot flies. Journal of Applied Entomology 113: 271–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, J.J., Prokopy, R.J. 1995 a. Control of apple maggot flies with pesticide-treated red spheres. Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 700–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duan, J.J., Prokopy, R.J. 1995 b. Development of pesticide-treated spheres for controlling apple maggot flies: pesticides and residue-extending agents. Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 117–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haniotakis, G.E., Kozyrakis, E., Bonatsos, C. 1986. Control of olive fruit fly by mass trapping: pilot scale feasibility study. Journal of Applied Entomology 101: 343–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, X.P., Clark, J.M., Prokopy, R.J. 1996. Progress in 1995 toward development of toxicant-treated spheres for controlling apple maggot flies. Fruit Notes 61(2): 10–3Google Scholar
Hu, X.P., Shasha, B., McGuire, M.R., Prokopy, R.J. 1998. Controlled release of sugar and toxicant from a novel device for controlling pest insects. Journal of Controlled Release 50: 257–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, X.P., Prokopy, R.J., Clark, J.M. 2000. Toxicity and residual effectiveness of insecticides on insecticide-treated spheres for controlling females of Rhagoletis pomonella. Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 403–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lafleur, G., Rull, J., Prokopy, R.J. 2001. Do sugar caps atop wooden pesticide-treated spheres affect apple maggot fly attraction to spheres? Fruit Notes 66: 37–9Google Scholar
Liburd, O.E., Gut, L.J., Stelinski, L.L., Whalon, M.E., McGuire, M.R., Wise, J.C., Willet, J.L., Hu, X.P., Prokopy, R.J. 1999. Mortality of Rhagoletis species encountering pesticide-treated spheres. Journal of Economic Entomology 92: 1151–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J. 1968. Visual responses of apple maggot flies: orchard studies. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 11: 403–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Christie, M., Johnson, S.A., O'Brien, M.T. 1990. Transitional step toward second-stage integrated management of arthropod pests of apple in Massachusetts orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology 83: 2405–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Mason, J.L., Christie, M., Wright, S.E. 1996. Arthropod pest and natural enemy abundance under second-level versus first-level integrated pest management practices in apple orchards: a 4-year study. Agriculture, Ecosystems, and Environment 57: 35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Wright, S.E., Chandler, B., Hu, X.P. 1998. Evaluation of varying doses of different toxicants for use on spheres to control apple maggot flies. Fruit Notes 63(4): 6–10Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Wright, S.E., Black, J.L., Hu, X.P., McGuire, M.R. 2000. Attracticidal spheres for controlling apple maggot flies: commercial orchard trials. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 97: 293–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., Chandler, B., Dynok, S., Appleton, P., Becker, S. 2001. Commercial orchard evaluation of pesticide-treated spheres for apple maggot control in 2001. Fruit Notes 66: 30–4Google Scholar
Stelinski, L.L., Liburd, O.E. 2001. Evaluation of various deployment strategies of imidacloprid-treated spheres in highbush blueberries for control of Rhagoletis mendax. Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 905–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stelinski, L.L., Liburd, O.E., Wright, S.E., Prokopy, R.J., Behle, R., McGuire, M.R. 2001. Comparison of neonicotinoid insecticides for use with biodegradable and wooden spheres for control of key Rhagoletis species. Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 1142–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trimble, R.M., Vickers, P.M. 2000. Evaluation of border sprays for managing codling moth and apple maggot in Ontario apple orchards. Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 777–87CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, A., Linn, C., Wright, S., Prokopy, R., Reissig, W., Roelofs, W. 1999. Identification of a new blend of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella. Journal of Chemical Ecology 25: 1221–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar