Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:42:34.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host Specificity of Calophasia lunula (Hufn.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. Harris
P. Harris
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This report shows: (1) by starvation tests on representative economic plants that none of them is a suitable host for C. lunula, (2) by feeding tests on plants in the Scrophulariaceae that only plants in the tribe Antirrhineae are potential hosts of the larvae, (3) by feeding tests with plant extracts that plants in the tribe Antirrhineae contain an unidentified feeding stimulant, (4) by preference tests with adults and larvae that, although the moths can be raised with difficulty in the laboratory on snapdragon and other ornamentals in the susceptible tribe, they are unlikely to attack these plants in nature.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 95 , Issue 1 , January 1963 , pp. 101 - 105
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, T. 1958. Life-history and ecology of the plum curculio, Conotrachelus nenuphar (Hbst.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Niagara Peninsula, Ontario. Can. Ent. 40: 8–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, W. E. 1922. 21st report of the State Entomologist of Connecticut (1921), Bull. 234.Google Scholar
Britton, W. E. 1926. 25th report of the State Entomologist of Connecticut (1925), Bull. 275.Google Scholar
Britton, W. E. 1928. 27th report of the State Entomologist of Connecticut (1927), Bull. 294.Google Scholar
Britton, W. E. 1930. 29th report of the State Entomologist of Connecticut (1929), Bull. 315.Google Scholar
Britton, W. E. 1931. 30th report of the State Entomologist of Connecticut (1930), Bull. 327.Google Scholar
Chin, C.-T. 1950. Studies on the physiological relationships between the larvae of Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say and some Solanaceous plants. Tijdschr. PlZiekt: 1–88.Google Scholar
Karny, M. 1961. Calophasia lunula (Hufn.) attacking toadflax. MS. Rept., C.I.B.C., Delemont, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Thorsteinson, A. J. 1960. Host Selection in phytophagous insects. Ann. Rev. Ent. 5: 193–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevelan, W. E., Procter, D. P., and Harrison, J. S.. 1950. Detection of sugars on paper chromatograms. Nature 166: 444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. R. 1954. The biological control of weeds. Report of the 6th Commonwealth Ent. Congress. London: 75–98.Google Scholar