Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T04:12:23.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOST SPECIFICITY AND SUITABILITY OF LEMA CYANELLA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE), A CANDIDATE FOR THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF CANADA THISTLE (CIRSIUM ARVENSE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D.P. Peschken  and
G.R. Johnson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The host specificity of Lema cyanella (L.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and its suitability as a biological control agent were investigated. The females lay an average of 1564 eggs and development from egg to adult takes 17.6 days at 25°C during the day and 20°C during the night (average about 23°C). Feeding of adults and larvae is confined to Cirsium, Carduus, and Silybum species, and according to literature records, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. is the main host. No economic plants are attacked. A colony of field collected beetles imported from Germany was infected with a Nosema disease. It is recommended that disease free L. cyanella should be released against the weed C. arvense in North America.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 111 , Issue 9 , September 1979 , pp. 1059 - 1068
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bedel, L. 1889. Faune des Coléoptères du Bassin de la Seine. Tome V. Ier fasc., 1601 pp. Société entomologique de France, Paris.Google Scholar
Bianco, V.V. 1968. Bibliography on artichokes. Vegetable Crops Ser. 149. University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
Chujo, M. 1933. Studies on the Chrysomelidae in the Japanese Empire 23. Sylvia Taihoku 51; 1: 19–56.Google Scholar
Chujo, M. 1959. Contribution to the fauna of Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera) in Japan (III). Mem. Fac. lib. Arts & Educ. Kagawa Univ. pt. II, No. 81.Google Scholar
Clavereau, H. 1913. Chrysomelidae: 1. Sagrinae, 2. Donaciinae, 3. Orsodacninae, 4. Criocerinae. Pars 51. 103 pp. In Junk, W. and Schenkling, S., Coleoptm. cat. W. Junk, Berlin. Vol. 24, 1913–1916.Google Scholar
Cornelius, C. 1859. Zur Ernährungs – und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Blattkäfer. Lema rugicollis Kug. Stettin. ent. Ztg 20: 44–45.Google Scholar
Dew, D. 1976. Alberta weed survey. Report, Research Station, Agric. Canada, Lacombe, Alberta.Google Scholar
Drea, J.J. 1973. Conflict of interest. pp. 49–55, in Proc. 2nd int. Symp. biol. Control of Weeds, Rome 1971. Misc. Publ. Commonw. Inst. biol. Contr. 6.Google Scholar
Dunn, P.H. 1978. Shortcomings in the classic tests of candidate insects for the biological control of weeds. pp. 51–56in Proc. 4th int. Symp. biol. Control of Weeds. University of Florida.Google Scholar
Dysart, R.J., Maltby, H.L., and Brunson, M.H.. 1973. Larval parasites of Oulema melanopus in Europe and their colonization in the United States. Entomophaga 18(2): 133–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everts, E. 1903. Coleoptera Neerlandica. Vol. 2. LXXII. Chrysomelidae. M. Nijhoff, 's-Gravenhage. pp. 387–522.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. 1890. The Coleoptera of the British Islands. IV. pp. 281–282.Google Scholar
Friesen, G. and Shebeski, L.H.. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Can. J. Pl. Sci. 40: 457–467.Google Scholar
Hänsel, S. 1924. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Biologie des Getreidehähnchens, Lema cyanella L. Z. wiss. InsektBiol. (Berlin) 19 (1): 27–29.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 1964. Host specificity of Altica carduorum Guer. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. J. Zool. 42: 857–862.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 1973. The selection of effective agents for the biological control of weeds. Can. Ent. 105: 1495–1503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J.M. 1968. The nature, ecology and control of Canada thistle. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric. 1386. 32 pp.Google Scholar
Hultén, E. 1971. The circumpolar plants. II. Dicotyledons. K. svenska Vetensk-Akad. Handl. (Fjarde Serien). 463 pp. Band 13, Nr. 1. Almquist and Wiksel, Stokholm.Google Scholar
Kuwayama, S. 1932. Studies on the morphology and ecology of the rice leaf beetle Lema oryzae Kuwayama, with special reference to taxonomic aspects. J. Fac. Agric. Hokkaido (imp.) Univ. 33: 1–132.Google Scholar
Lopatin, I.K. 1960. Data on the fauna and ecology of leaf-beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) on the Southern rear Bank of the Dnieper River. Ent. Rev. 39(3): 447–457.Google Scholar
Medvedev, L.N. 1958. Chinesische und japanische Criocerinen aus der Kollektion des Museums G. Frey (Col. Chrysom.). Ent. Arb. Mus. Georg Frey 9: 106–113.Google Scholar
Mesnil, L. 1931. Contribution à l'étude de trois coléoptères nuisibles dans céréales. Annls Epiphyt. 16: 190–208.Google Scholar
Mohr, K.H. 1966. 88. Familie: Chrysomelidae. pp. 95–280in Freude, H., Harde, K.W., und Lohse, G.A., Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Vol. 9. Goecke and Evers, Krefeld.Google Scholar
Monrós, F. 1959 Los generos de Chrysomelidae (Coleoptera). Univ. Nac. Tucuman Inst. Miguel Lillo. 3: 5–336.Google Scholar
Ohwi, J. 1965. Flora of Japan (in English). Smithsonian Institution, Washington. IX. 1067 pp.Google Scholar
Peschken, D.P. and Beecher, R.W.. 1973. Ceutorhynchus litura (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): Biology and first releases for biological control of the weed Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) in Ontario, Canada. Can. Ent. 105: 1489–1494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reitter, E. 1912. Fauna Germanica. Die Käfer des Deutschen Reiches. Band. IV. 6. Familienreihe Phytophaga 2. K.G. Lutz Verlag. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ruffo, S. 1964. Contributi alla conoscenza della distribuzione dei Coleotteri Crisomelidi nella regione appenninica. Memorie Mus. Stor. nat. Verona 12: 41–96.Google Scholar
Rupertsberger, M. 1872. Beiträge zur Lebensgeschichte der Käfer. Verh. zool.-bot. Ges. Wien 22: 7–26.Google Scholar
Sengupta, G. Ch. and Behura, B.K.. 1957. On the biology of Lema praeusta Fab. J. econ. Ent. 50: 471–474.Google Scholar
Slobodyanyuk, V. Ya. 1975. (A useful species of Lema.) Zashch. Rust. 2. p. 50.Google Scholar
Stypa-Mirek, W. 1963. Stonkowate (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) Poznania I okolicy. Badan. fizjogr. Pol. Zachod. 12: 85–119.Google Scholar
Thomas, A.G. 1976. 1976 Weed survey of cultivated land in Saskatchewan. Rep. Agric. Can. Res. Stn., Regina, Sask.93 pp.Google Scholar
Warchalowski, A. 1974. Übersicht der Blattkäfer Bulgariens (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Polskie Pismo ent. 44: 473–542.Google Scholar
Weise, J. 1881. Coleoptera. IN: Naturgeschichte der Insekten Deutschlands. Nicolaische Verlagsbunch-handlung. 1. Abteilung. Band 6. Lieferung I.Google Scholar
Winiarska, W. 1973. (Observations on the biology of Lema cyanella L. Chrysomelidae, Criocerinae.) Polskie Pismo ent. 43(20): 373–382.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. and Harris, P.. 1966. Ceutorhynchus litura (F.) (Col.: Curculionidae) a potential insect for the biological control of thistle, Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. in Canada. Can. J. Zool. 44: 23–37.Google Scholar
Zwölfer, H. and Pattullo, W.. 1970. Zur Lebensweise und Wirtsbindung des Distel-Blattkäfers Lema cyanella L. (puncticollis Curt.) (Col. Chrysomelidae). Anz. Schädlingsk. 43(4): 53–59.Google Scholar