Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:03:54.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Host selection by Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): inferences from sticky-band trapping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

D. Barry Lyons ,
Peter de Groot ,
Gene C. Jones  and
Roger Scharbach
D. Barry Lyons*
Affiliation:
Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5
Peter de Groot
Affiliation:
Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5
Gene C. Jones
Affiliation:
Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5
Roger Scharbach
Affiliation:
Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 2E5
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sticky-band trapping experiments were undertaken in 2003–2006 to examine the host-seeking behaviour of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, in woodlots in southwestern Ontario, Canada. The female proportion of A. plannipennis emerging from host logs ranged from 0.414 to 0.582. Landings on sticky-band traps varied more with the female proportion, ranging from 0.392 to 0.889, with the majority in the upper range, suggesting behavioural differences between the sexes. Correlations between landing density and tree size measured as diameter at breast height were positive or showed no relationship. In some locations more beetles were captured on the south side of the tree than on the north side; however, there was no difference between these cardinal directions at other locations. Numbers of captured beetles were never significantly greater on the north side of boles. We observed greater landing densities of adults of both sexes on traps on trees along the edges of woodlots than on trees within the woodlots. When given a choice under natural conditions, beetles landed almost exclusively on host trees (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh. (Oleaceae)) rather than on other common trees species (Carya ovata (Mill.) K. Koch (Juglandaceae), Tilia americana L. (Tiliaceae), and species of Acer L. (Aceraceae)) found in the same woodlots. Our data suggest that A. planipennis make host-selection decisions while in flight rather than landing randomly. Implications for monitoring A. plannipennis using sticky-band traps and understanding its host-seeking behaviour are discussed.

Résumé

En 2003 – 2006, nous avons mené des expériences de capture à l’aide de pièges à bandes collantes afin d’étudier le comportement de recherche de l’hôte chez l’agrile du frêne, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, dans des terres boisées du sud-ouest de l’Ontario, Canada. La proportion de femelles d’A. planipennis qui émergent des billes de l’hôte varie de 0,414 à 0,582. La proportion de femelles qui se posent sur les pièges à bandes collantes est plus variable et va de 0,392 à 0,889; dans la majorité des cas, elle se situe dans la région supérieure de cette gamme de valeurs, ce qui laisse croire à des différences de comportement entre les sexes. Les corrélations entre la densité d’insectes qui se posent et la taille des arbres, déterminée par le diamètre à hauteur de poitrine, sont ou bien positives ou nulles. Dans certains sites, plus de coléoptères ont été récoltés du côté sud des arbres que du côté nord; ailleurs, il n’y a pas de différence en fonction des points cardinaux. Les nombres de coléoptères capturés ne sont jamais significativement supérieurs du côté nord des troncs. Les densités des adultes des deux sexes qui se posent sur les pièges dans les arbres en orée sont plus grandes que sur les arbres à l’intérieur des terres boisées. Lorsqu’ils ont le choix en conditions naturelles, les coléoptères se posent presque exclusivement sur les arbres hôtes (Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marsh. (Oleaceae), plutôt que sur les autres espèces communes d’arbres (Carya ovata (Mill.) K. Koch (Juglandaceae), Tilia americana L. (Tiliaceae) et d’érables Acer L. (Aceraceae) trouvées dans les mêmes terres boisées. Nos données laissent croire que les A. planipennis font la sélection de leur hôte pendant le vol plutôt que de se poser au hasard. Nous discutons des implications de nos résultats sur la surveillance d’A. planipennis à l’aide de pièges à bandes collantes et sur la compréhension de son comportement de recherche d’hôte.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 141 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 40 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akiyama, K., and Ohmomo, S. 2000. The buprestid beetles of the world. Iconic Series of Insects 4. Gekkan-Mushi Company, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Anulewicz, A.C., McCullough, D.G., and Miller, D.L. 2006. Oviposition and development of emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) on hosts and potential hosts in no-choice tests. The Great Lakes Entomologist, 39: 99–111.Google Scholar
Anulewicz, A.C., McCullough, D.G., Cappaert, D.L., and Poland, T.M. 2008. Host range of the emerald ash borer (Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) in North America: results of multiple-choice field experiments. Environmental Entomology, 37: 230–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barter, G.W. 1957. Studies of the bronze birch borer, Agrilus anxius Gory, in New Brunswick. The Canadian Entomologist, 89: 12–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2008. Emerald ash borer — Agrilus planipennis [online]. Available from http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/plaveg/pestrava/agrpla/agrplae.shtml [accessed 12 September 2008].Google Scholar
Cappaert, D., McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., and Siegert, N.W. 2005. Emerald ash borer in North America: a research and regulatory challenge. American Entomologist, 51: 152–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinese Academy of Science. 1986. Agrilus marcopoli Obenberger. In Agricultural insects of China. Part 1. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, People's Republic of China. p. 445.Google Scholar
Crook, D.J., Khrimian, A., Francese, J.A., Fraser, I., Poland, T.M., Sawyer, A.J., and Mastro, V.C. 2008. Development of a host-based semiochemical lure for trapping emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Environmental Entomology, 37: 356–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czerwinski, E.J., Tucker, L., Evans, H.J., Biggs, W.D., and Rowlinson, D.T. 2007. Invasive species in Ontario's forests. In Forest health conditions in Ontario, 2006. Edited by Scarr, T., Hopkins, A., and Pollard, J.. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario. pp. 23–41.Google Scholar
de Groot, P., Biggs, W.D., Lyons, D.B., Scarr, T., Czerwinski, E., Evans, H.J., Ingram, W., and Marchant, K. 2006. A visual guide to detecting emerald ash borer damage. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.Google Scholar
de Groot, P., Grant, G.G., Poland, T.M., Scharbach, R., Buchan, L., Nott, R.W., MacDonald, L., and D, Pitt.. 2008. Electrophysiological response and attraction of emerald ash borer to green leaf volatiles (GLVs) emitted by host foliage. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 34: 1170–1179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunbar, D.M., and Stephens, G.R. 1976. The bionomics of twolined chestnut borer. In Perspectives in forest entomology. Edited by Anderson, J.F. and Kaya, H.K.. Academic Press, New York. pp. 73–83.Google Scholar
Dunn, J.P., Kimmerer, W., and Nordin, G.L. 1986. The role of host tree condition in attack of white oaks by the twolined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus (Weber) (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Oecologia (Berlin), 70: 596–600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J.P., Potter, D.A., and Kimmerer, T.W. 1990. Carbohydrate reserves, radial growth, and mechanisms of resistance of oak trees to phloem-boring insects. Oecolgia (Berlin), 83: 458–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EAB Info. 2008. Emerald ash borer. http://www.emeraldashborer.info/ [online] [accessed 12 September 2008]Google Scholar
Francese, J.A., Mastro, V.C., Oliver, J.B., Lance, D.R., and Youssef, N. 2005. Evaluation of colors for trapping Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Entomological Science, 40: 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, I., Francese, J.A., Lance, D.R., Mastro, V.C., Oliver, J.B., and Youssef, N. 2005. Studies to develop an emerald ash borer survey trap: III. Tree banding. In Proceedings of the Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Romulus, Michigan, 5–6 October 2004. Compiled by Mastro, V. and Reardon, R.. FHTET–2004–15, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia. p. 63. [Abstr.]Google Scholar
Goeden, R.D., and Norris, D.M. 1965. The behavior of Scolytus quadrispinosus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) during the dispersal flight as related to its host specificities. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 58: 249–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, R.A. 2006. Exotic bark- and wood-boring Coleoptera in the United States: recent establishments and interceptions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 269–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, R.A., and Benjamin, D.M. 1982. The biology and ecology of the two-lined chestnut borer, Agrilus bilineatus (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), on oaks, Quercus spp., in Wisconsin. The Canadian Entomologist, 114: 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haack, R.A., Jendek, E., Liu, H., Marchant, K.R., Petrice, T.R., Poland, T.M., and Ye, H. 2002. The emerald ash borer: a new exotic pest in North America. Newsletter of the Michigan Entomological Society, 47: 1–5.Google Scholar
Herms, D.A., McCullough, D.G., and Smitley, D.R. 2004. Under attack: the current status of the emerald ash borer infestation and the program to eradicate it. American Nurseryman, 200: 20–27.Google Scholar
Hynum, B.G., and Berryman, A.A. 1980. Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) pre-aggregation landing and gallery initiation on lodgepole pine. The Canadian Entomologist, 112: 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lance, D.R., Fraser, I., and Mastro, V.C. 2007. Activity and microhabitat-selection patterns for emerald ash borer and their implications for the development of trapping systems. In Proceedings of the Emerald Ash Borer and Asian Longhorned Beetle Research and Technology Development Meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio, 29 October — 2November 2006. Compiled by Mastro, V., Lance, D., Reardon, R., and Parra, G.. FHTET–2007—04, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia. pp. 77–78. [Abstr.]Google Scholar
Lelito, J.P., Fraser, I., Mastro, V.C., Tumlinson, J.H., Böröczky, K., and Baker, T.C. 2007. Visually mediated ‘paratrooper copulations’ in the mating behavior of Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), a highly destructive invasive pest of North American ash trees. Journal of Insect Behavior, 20: 537–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H., Bauer, L.S., Gao, R., Zhoa, T., Petrice, T.R., and Haack, R.A. 2003. Exploratory survey for the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), and its natural enemies in China. The Great Lakes Entomologist, 36: 191–204.Google Scholar
Lyons, D.B., and Jones, G.C. 2005. The biology and phenology of the emerald ash borer. In Proceedings of the 16th United States Department of Agriculture Interagency Research Forum on Gypsy Moth and Other Invasive Species, 2005, Annapolis, Maryland, 18–21 January 2005. Edited by Gottschalk, K.W.. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service General Technical Report NE-337, Morgantown, West Virginia. pp. 62–63. [Abstr.]Google Scholar
Lyons, D.B., Caister, C., de Groot, P., Hamilton, B., Marchant, K., Scarr, T., and Turgeon, J. 2007. Survey guide for detection of emerald ash borer. Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, and Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G., and Siegert, N.W. 2007. Estimating potential emerald ash borer (Coleoptera: Buprestidae) populations using ash inventory data. Journal of Economic Entomology, 100: 1566–1586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCullough, D.G., Poland, T.M., and Cappaert, D.L. 2006. Attraction of emerald ash borer to trap trees: effects of stress agents and trap height. In Proceedings of the Emerald Ash Borer Research Technology Development Meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 26–27 September 2006. Compiled by Mastro, V., Lance, D., Reardon, R., and Parra, G.. FHTET–2005—16, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia. pp. 61–62. [Abstr.]Google Scholar
Muzika, R.M., Liebhold, A.M., and Twery, M.J. 2000. Dynamics of twolined chestnut borer Agrilus bilineatus as influenced by defoliation and selection thinning. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 2: 283–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, D.J. 1996. Estimating leaf area and leaf biomass of open-grown deciduous urban trees. Forest Science, 42: 504–507.Google Scholar
Poland, T.M., and McCullough, D.G. 2006. Emerald ash borer: invasion of the urban forest and the threat to North America's ash resource. Journal of Forestry, 104: 118–124.Google Scholar
Poland, T.M., McCullough, D.G., Grant, G., MacDonald, L., and Cappaert, D.L. 2005. Progress toward developing trapping techniques for the emerald ash borer. In Proceedings of the Emerald Ash Borer Research and Technology Development Meeting, Romulus, Michigan, 5–6 October 2004. Compiled by Mastro, V. and Reardon, R.. FHTET–2004—15, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia. pp. 53–54. [Abstr.]Google Scholar
Poland, T.M., Pureswaran, D.S., Grant, G., and de Groot, P. 2007. Field attraction of emerald ash borer to antennally and behaviorally active ash volatiles. In Proceedings of the Emerald Ash Borer and Asian Longhorned Beetle Research and Technology Development Meeting, Cincinnati, Ohio, 29 October — 2 November 2006. Compiled by Mastro, V., Lance, D., Reardon, R., and Parra, G.. FHTET–2007—04, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Morgantown, West Virginia. pp. 80–81. [Abstr.]Google Scholar
Prokopy, R.J., and Owens, E.D. 1983. Visual detection of plants by herbivorous insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 28: 338–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez-Saona, C., Poland, T.M., Miller, J.R., Stelinski, L.L., Grant, G.G., de Groot, P., Buchan, L., and MacDonald, L. 2006. Behavioral and electro-physiological responses of the emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, to induced volatiles of Man-churian ash, Fraxinus mandshurica. Chemoecology, 16: 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saint-Germain, M., Buddle, C.M., and Drapeau, P. 2007. Primary attraction and random landing in host-selection by wood-feeding insects: a matter of scale? Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 9: 227–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute Inc. 2003. SAS® statistical package. Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
Schowalter, T.D., Hargrove, W.W., and Crossley, D.A. Jr. 1986. Herbivory in forested ecosystems. Annual Review of Entomology, 31: 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Systat Software Inc. 2006. SigmaStat®. Version 3.5 for Windows®. Systat Software Inc., San Jose, California.Google Scholar
Timms, L.L., Smith, S.M., and de Groot, P. 2006. Patterns in the within tree distribution of the emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (Fairemaire) in young, green-ash plantations of south-western Ontario, Canada. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 8: 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture. 2008. USDA-APHIS-PPQ-EAB 2008 emerald ash borer survey guidelines [online]. Available from http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/emerald_ash_b/downloads/survey_guidelines_2008.pdf [accessed 12 September 2008].Google Scholar
Wei, X., Reardon, D., Wun, Y., and Sun, J. 2004. Emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), in China: a review and distribution survey. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 47: 679–685.Google Scholar
Wellso, S.G., Manley, G.V., and Jackman, J.A. 1976. Keys and notes on the Buprestidae (Coleoptera) of Michigan. Great Lakes Entomologist, 9: 1–22.Google Scholar
Yu, C. 1992. Agrilus marcopoli Obenberger (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). In Forest insects of China. 2nd ed. Edited by Xiao, G.. China Forestry Publishing House, Beijing, People's Republic of China. pp. 400–401.Google Scholar
Zhao, T., Gao, R., Liu, H., Bauer, L.S., and Sun, L. 2005. Host range of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire, its damage and the countermeasures. Acta Entomologica Sinica, 48: 594–599. [In Chinese with English abstract.]Google Scholar