Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T22:48:50.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hitching a ride: firewood as a potential pathway for range expansion of an exotic beech leaf-mining weevil, Orchestes fagi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2016

Andrew Morrison
Affiliation:
Forest Protection Limited, Fredericton International Airport, 2502 Route 102 Highway, Lincoln, New Brunswick, E3B 7E6, Canada Population Ecology Group, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 6C2, Canada
Jon Sweeney
Affiliation:
Population Ecology Group, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 6C2, Canada Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5P7, Canada
Cory Hughes
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5P7, Canada
Rob C. Johns*
Affiliation:
Population Ecology Group, Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 6C2, Canada Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service – Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick, E3B 5P7, Canada
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

We investigated the potential for human-mediated range expansion of an exotic beech leaf-mining weevil, Orchestes fagi (Linnaeus) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Curculioninae: Rhamphini) (formerly known as Rhynchaenus fagi) on timber or firewood, which for eight to nine months of the year may harbour adults in diapause. In both relatively low-density and high-density populations, adults were found on the base, middle, and upper boles of the primary host, American beech (Fagus grandifolia Ehrhart; Fagaceae), as well as red maple (Acer rubrum Linnaeus; Sapindaceae) and red spruce (Picea rubens Sargent; Pinaceae) in the vicinity. Comparatively few individuals were found on tree branches, or in the moss, duff, or soil collected beneath beech trees. Overwintering adults appeared to favour parts of trees with relatively high bark roughness. Our study suggests that, between the months of July through May, any woody stems near areas having O. fagi outbreaks are likely to harbour adults. Moreover, as all of the trees studied are common sources of timber or firewood, the harvest and transport of wood from these areas may facilitate outbreak spread; this may explain the multiple, distantly distributed populations of O. fagi that have been reported in eastern Nova Scotia, Canada in recent years.

Type
Insect Management
Copyright
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Deepa Pureswaran

References

Allen, E.A. and Humble, L.M. 2002. Nonindigenous species introductions: a threat to Canada’s forests and forest economy. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology, 24: 103110.Google Scholar
Bale, J.S. 1981. Seasonal distribution and migratory behavior of the beech leaf mining weevil, Rhynchaenus fagi L. Ecological Entomology, 6: 109118.Google Scholar
Bale, J.S. 1984. Budburst and success of the beech weevil, Rhynchaenus fagi L.: feeding and oviposition. Ecological Entomology, 9: 139148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bale, J.S. and Luff, M.L. 1978. The food plants and feeding preferences of the beech leaf mining weevil, Rhynchaenus fagi L. Ecological Entomology, 3: 245249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, B.M. 1990. Picea rubens Sarg. Red spruce. In Silvics of North America, volume 1. conifers. Agriculture Handbook 654. Edited by R.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC, United States of America. Pp. 250259.Google Scholar
Brockerhoff, E.G., Liebhold, A.M., and Jactel, H. 2006. The ecology of forest insect invasions and advances in their management. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 263268.Google Scholar
Canadian Food Inspection Agency. 2013. 2013 Beech leaf-mining weevil survey. Canadian Food Inspection Agency Plant Health Survey Unit, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Coulson, S.J. and Bale, J.S. 1996. Supercooling and survival of the beech leaf mining weevil Rhynchaenus fagi L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Journal of Insect Physiology, 42: 617623.Google Scholar
Ehlrich, J. 1934. The beech bark disease a Nectria disease of Fagus, following Cryptococcus fagi (Baer.). Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 10: 593692.Google Scholar
Elton, C.S. 2000. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. Methuen, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Faccoli, M. and Gatto, P. 2016. Analysis of costs and benefits of Asian longhorned beetle eradication in Italy. Forestry, 89: 301309.Google Scholar
Fagan, W.F., Lewis, M.A., and van den Driessche, P. 2002. Invasion theory and biological control. Ecological Letters, 5: 148157.Google Scholar
Haack, R.A., Petrice, T.R., and Wiedenhoeft, A.C. 2010. Incidence of bark- and wood-boring insects in firewood: a survey at Michigan’s Mackinac bridge. Journal of Economic Entomology, 103: 16821692.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmes, T.P., Aukema, J.E., Von Holle, B., Liebhold, A., and Sills, E. 2009. Economic impacts of invasive species in forests: past, present, and future. The year in ecology and conservation biology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162: 1838.Google Scholar
Holmes, T.P., Liebhold, A.M., Kovacs, K.F., and Von Holle, B. 2010. A spatial-dynamic value transfer model of economic losses from a biological invasion. Ecological Economics, 70: 8695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holway, D.A. and Suarez, A.V. 1999. Animal behavior: an essential component of invasion biology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 14: 328330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houston, D.R. and O’Brien, T.J. 1983. Beech bark disease [online]. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Pest Leaflet 75. Available from www.na.fs.fed.us/spfo/pubs/fidls/beechbark/fidl-beech.htm [accessed 10 July 2016].Google Scholar
Hulme, P.E., Roy, D.B., Cunha, T., and Larsson, T.-B. 2009. A pan-European inventory of alien species: rationale, implementation and implications for managing biological invasions. In The handbook of alien species in Europe. Delivering Alien Invasive Species Inventories for Europe. Edited by J.A. Drake. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Lee, J.E. and Chown, L. 2009. Breaching the dispersal barrier to invasion: quantification and management. Ecological Applications, 19: 19441959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebhold, A.M. and Tobin, P.C. 2008. Population ecology of insect invasions and their management. Annual Review of Entomology, 53: 387408.Google Scholar
Martin, C.W. and Valentine, J.F. 2011. Impacts of a habitat-forming exotic species on estuarine structure and function: an experimental assessment of Eurasian milfoil. Estuaries and Coasts, 34: 364372.Google Scholar
McCullough, D.G., Heyd, R.L., and O’Brien, J.G. 2003. Biology and management of beech bark disease: Michigan’s newest exotic forest pest [online]. Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E-2746. Available from http://michigansaf.org/ForestInfo/Health/BBdisease.htm [accessed 10 July 2016].Google Scholar
McLaughlin, J. and Griefenhagen, S. 2012. Beech bark disease in Ontario: a primer and management recommendations. Forest Research Note 71. Ontario Forest Research Institute, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
Moise, E.R.D., Forbes, G.B.H., Morrison, A., Sweeney, J.D., Hillier, N.K., and Johns, R.C. 2015. Evidence for a substantial host-use bottleneck following the invasion of an exotic, polyphagous weevil. Ecological Entomology, 40: 796804.Google Scholar
Morin, R.S., Liebhold, A.M., Tobin, P.C., Gottschalk, K.W., and Luzader, E. 2007. Spread of beach bark disease in the eastern United States and its relationship to regional forest composition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37: 726736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, M.G. 1968. Some probable overwintering sites of Rhynchaenus fagi L. (Col. Curculionidae). Entomology Monthly Magazine, 104: 129.Google Scholar
Nielsen, B.O. 1970. Observations on the hibernation of the beech weevil (Rhynchaenus fagi L.) in Denmark. Entomologica Scandinavica, 1: 223226.Google Scholar
Pimentel, D. 1986. Biological invasions of plants and animals in agriculture and forestry. In Ecology of biological invasions in North America and Hawaii. Edited by H.A. Mooney and J.A. Drake. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, United States of America. Pp. 149162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roques, A., Rabitsch, W., Rasplus, J-Y., Lopez-Vamonde, C., Nentwig, W., and Kenis, M. 2009. Alien terrestrial invertebrates of Europe. In DAISIE handbook of alien species in Europe. Edited by J.A. Drake. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 6379.Google Scholar
SAS Institute. 1999. The SAS system version 8 for windows. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, United States of America.Google Scholar
Sweeney, J., Anderson, R.S., Webster, R.P., and Neville, R. 2012. First record of Orchestes fagi (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Curculioninae) in North America, with a checklist of the North American Rhamphini. The Coleopterists Bulletin, 66: 297304.Google Scholar
Tubbs, C.H. and Houston, D.R. 1990. Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. American beech. In Silvics of North America. Volume 2. Edited by R.M. Burns and B.H. Honkala. Agricultural Handbook 654. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America. Pp. 325332.Google Scholar
Woodbridge Associates. 2011. Economic impact analysis of timber management & supply changes on Nova Scotia’s forest industry [online]. Available from http://novascotia.ca/natr/strategy/pdf/Woodbridge-May-2011.pdf [accessed 10 July 2016].Google Scholar