Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:22:07.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geographic distribution and ecology of two species of Orsillus (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) associated with cones of native and introduced Cupressaceae in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Gaelle Rouault ,
Raffaella Cantini ,
Andrea Battisti  and
Alain Roques
Gaelle Rouault
Affiliation:
INRA, station de Zoologie Forestière, B.P. 20619 Ardon, 45166 Olivet CEDEX, France
Raffaella Cantini
Affiliation:
Istituto per la Protezione delle Piante, CNR, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy
Andrea Battisti
Affiliation:
University of Padova, DAAPV-Entomology, Agripolis, 35020 Legnaro PD, Italy
Alain Roques*
Affiliation:
INRA, station de Zoologie Forestière, B.P. 20619 Ardon, 45166 Olivet CEDEX, France
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the Mediterranean Basin, two species of true seed bugs in the genus Orsillus Dallas, O. maculatus Fieber and O. depressus Mulsant et Rey, share the exploitation of seed cones of Cupressaceae for feeding and reproduction and may carry spores of the pathogenic fungus Seiridium cardinale Sutton & Gibson, responsible for the cypress bark canker disease. We compared the life history of the two species. A total of 89 cone collections carried out in 10 Mediterranean countries confirmed that O. maculatus is most closely associated with Cupressus sempervirens L., although it may also infest some other Cupressus L. species and, more rarely, species of Chamaecyparis Spach. Orsillus depressus appears to be less host-specific, being capable of feeding and ovipositing on most of the native and exotic species of Juniperus L., Cupressus, and Chamaecyparis. On C. sempervirens, the abundance of each Orsillus species follows an inverted longitudinal gradient along the Mediterranean Basin, probably corresponding to the pathway of introduction of this tree species from its native eastern range towards western Europe. The dominance of O. maculatus progressively decreases from east to west, whereas O. depressus becomes dominant in the Iberian Peninsula. By contrast, O. depressus is the dominant seed bug on other Cupressaceae all over Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. In the area in which C. sempervirens has been introducted, both Orsillus species may live on the same tree, but morphological variability of both adults and nymphs often hinders accurate identification of the species. Based on frequency distribution, the relative length of the rostrum compared with that of the body seems to be a diagnostic character for specific identification of nymphs of the last two instars.

Résumé

Dans le Bassin Méditerranéen, deux punaises des graines du genre Orsillus Dallas, O. maculatus Fieber et O. depressus Mulsant et Rey, se partagent l'exploitation des cônes de Cupressacées pour leur nutrition et leur reproduction. Ces deux espèces transportent les spores d'un champignon pathogène, Seiridium cardinale Sutton & Gibson, responsable de la maladie du chancre cortical du cyprès. Le cycle biologique respectif des deux espèces est comparé. L'analyse de 89 récoltes de cônes réalisées dans 10 pays méditerranéens a confirmé que O. maculatus est plus étroitement associée à Cupressus sempervirens L. bien qu'elle puisse aussi se retrouver sur d'autres espèces de Cyprès et, mais plus rarement, de Chamaecyparis Spach. Orsillus depressus semble plus oligophage, étant capable de se nourrir et de se reproduire sur la plupart des espèces natives et exotiques de Cupressacées. Sur C. sempervirens, l'abondance relative de chaque espèce suit un gradient longitudinal inversé le long du Bassin Méditerranéen, qui correspond vraisemblablement à la route d'introduction de l'essence-hôte depuis son aire d'origine orientale vers l'Europe occidentale. La dominance d'O. maculatus décroît progressivement d'est en ouest, O. depressus devenant l'espèce principale dans la Péninsule Ibérique. Sur les autres Cupressaceae, O. depressus est l'espèce prédominante dans l'ensemble de l'Europe comme dans le Bassin Méditerranéen. Dans l'aire d'introduction de C. sempervirens, les deux espèces cohabitent parfois sur un même arbre, mais l'identification de chaque espèce est rendue difficile par des variations morphologiques chez les adultes et les larves. Sur la base de la distribution des fréquences, la longueur relative du rostre comparée à celle du corps semble constituer un caractère diagnostique pour la différenciation des larves des deux derniers stades de chaque espèce.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 137 , Issue 4 , August 2005 , pp. 450 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aukema, B. 1988. Orsillus depressus nieuw voor Nederland en België (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae). Entomologische Berichten (Amsterdam), 48: 181–183.Google Scholar
Barthelet, J., and Vinot, M. 1944. Notes sur les maladies des cultures méridionales. Annales des Epiphyties (Paris), 10: 11–23.Google Scholar
Battisti, A., Colombari, F., Frigimelica, G., and Guido, M. 1997. Life history of Orsillus maculatus, a true bug damaging seeds of Cupressus sempervirens. In Proceedings of the 5th Cone and Seed Insects Working Party Conference (IUFRO S2.07-01), Monte Bondone, Italy, September 1996. Edited by Battisti, A. and Turgeon, J.J.. Institute of Agricultural Entomology, Padova, Italy. pp. 215–220.Google Scholar
Battisti, A., Roques, A., Colombari, F., Frigimelica, G., and Guido, M. 1999. Efficient transmission of an introduced pathogen via an ancient insectfungus association. Naturwissenschaften, 86: 479–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Battisti, A., Cantini, R., Feci, E., Frigimelica, G., Guido, M., and Roques, A. 2000. Detection and evaluation of seed damage of cypress, Cupressus sempervirens L., in Italy. Seed Science and Technology, 28: 199–208.Google Scholar
Battisti, A., Cantini, R., Rouault, G., and Roques, A. 2003. Serotinous cones of Cupressus sempervirens provide viable seeds in spite of high seed predation. Annals of Forest Science, 60: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumann, H. 1982. Die grieschische Pflanzenwelt in Mythos. Kunst und Literatur. Himer Verlag, München.Google Scholar
Ben Jamaa, M.L., and Roques, A. 1999. Survey of impact on seed cones of two species of Cupressaceae, Cupressus sempervirens L., and Tetraclinis articulata Mast. in Tunisia. Arab Journal of Plant Protection, 17: 107–112.Google Scholar
Blasco-Zumeta, J. 2000. Contribution à l'étude de la faune assoviée à Juniperus thurifera. L. dans Los Monegros (Aragon, Espagne). In Le Genévrier Thurifère (Juniperus thurifera. L.) dans le bassin occidental de la Méditerranée: systématique, écologie, dynamique et gestion. Actes du colloque international de Marignac, Haute-Garonne, France, 26–27 September 1997. Edited by Gauquelin, T., Asmodé, J.-F., and Largier, G.. Les Dossiers Forestiers No. 6, Office National des Forêts, Paris, France. pp. 94–103.Google Scholar
Blatt, S.E., and Borden, J.H. 1998. Interactions between the Douglas-fir seed chalcid, Megastigmus spermotrophus (Hymenoptera: Torymidae), and the western conifer seed bug, Leptoglossus occidentalis (Hemiptera: Coreidae). The Canadian Entomologist, 130: 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouaziz, K., and Chakali, C. 1997. Diversity and impact of cone and seed insects in Algeria. In Proceedings of the 5th Cone and Seed Insects Working Party Conference (IUFRO S2.07-01), Monte Bondone, Italy, September 1996. Edited by Battisti, A. and Turgeon, J.J.. Institute of Agricultural Entomology, Padova, Italy. pp. 193–207.Google Scholar
Cantini, R. 1997. Artropodi dei coni e dei semi del cipresso: osservazioni sulla biologia e sulle relazioni con funghi patogeni. Università degli studi di Firenze, Facoltà di Agraria corso di laurea in scienze forestali. Istituto di Patologia e Zoologia Forestale e Agraria, Italy.Google Scholar
Carroll, S.P., and Boyd, C. 1992. Host race radiation in the soapberry bug: natural history with the history. Evolution, 46: 1052–1069.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carroll, S.P., and Loye, J.E. 1987. Specialization of Jadera species (Hemiptera: Rhopalidae) on the seeds of Sapindaceae (Sapindales), and coevolutionary responses of defense and attack. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 80: 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S.P., Dingle, H., and Klassen, S.P. 1997. Genetic differentiation of fitness-associated traits among rapidly evolving populations of the soapberry bug. Evolution, 51: 1182–1188.Google ScholarPubMed
Cleu, H. 1950. Les faunes entomologiques méditerranéennes dans le bassin du Rhône et leurs rapports avec les éléments de la flore. Mémoires du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, 30: 243–266.Google Scholar
Cleu, H. 1953. Biogéographie et peuplement entomologique du bassin de l'Ardèche. Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 122:1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colombari, F. 1996. Orsillus maculatus (Fieber) (Rhynchota Lygaeidae) su Cupressus sempervirens L.: attivita spermofaga e diffusione di funghi patogeni. Ph.D. thesis, Universita degli studi di Padova, Italy.Google Scholar
Dioli, P. 1991. Presenza di Orsillus depressus Dallas, 1852 nella zona alpina e osservazioni sulle specie italiane del genere (Insecta, Heteroptera, Lygaeidae). Il Naturalista Valtellinese, 2: 47–51.Google Scholar
Dupuis, C. 1965. Etude de l'oligophagie de trois punaises des Genévriers. Cahiers des Naturalistes, 21: 105–122.Google Scholar
El Alaoui El Fels, M.A. 1997. Entomofauna of conifer seed cones in the western High Atlas, Morocco. In Proceedings of the 5th Cone and Seed Insects Working Party Conference (IUFRO S2.07-01), Monte Bondone, Italy, September 1996. Edited by Battisti, A. and Turgeon, J.J.. Institute of Agricultural Entomology, Padova, Italy. pp. 21–26.Google Scholar
El Alaoui El Fels, M.A. 1999 a. Les arthropodes liés à des conifères autochtones des Atlas marocains: biologie, distribution des principaux ravageurs des cônes et des graines et impact sur la régénération naturelle. Ph.D. thesis, Ecologie et Environnement, Université de Semlalia, Marrakech, Morocco.Google Scholar
El Alaoui El Fels, M.A., Roques, A., and Boumezzough, A. 1999 b. Les arthropodes liés aux galbules et aux graines du genévrier thurifére, Juniperus thurifera L., dans les Atlas marocains. Ecologia Mediterranea, 25: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frenzel, M., Brändle, M., and Brandl, R. 2000. The colonization of alien plants by native phytophagous insects. In Proceedings of the 41st IAVS Symposium, Uppsala, Sweden, 26–31 July 1998. Opulus Press, Grangärde, Sweden. pp. 223–225.Google Scholar
Garcia, B.A. 1998. Interaction between juniper Juniperus communis L., and its fruit pest insects: pest abundance, fruit characteristics and seed viability. Acta Oecologia, 19: 517–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, D., Zamora, R., Gomez, J.M., Jordano, P., and Hodar, J.A. 2000. Geographical variation in seed production, predation and abortion in Juniperus communis throughout its range in Europe. Journal of Ecology, 88: 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graniti, A. 1998. Cypress canker: a pandemic in progress. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 36: 91–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grasso, V. 1951. Un nuovo agente patogeno del Cup. macrocarpa Hartw. in Italia. Italia Forestale e Montana, 6: 62–65.Google Scholar
Guido, M., Battisti, A., and Roques, A. 1995. A contribution to the study of cone and seed pests of the evergreen cypress (Cupressus sempervirens L.) in Italy. Redia, 78: 211–227.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R.D. 1989. Orsillus depressus Dallas (Hem., Lygaeidae) an arboreal groundbug new to Britain. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 125: 241–244.Google Scholar
Kiritchenko, A.N. 1951. True bugs of the European Russia (Hemiptera) — keys and bibliography. Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk CCCP, Moskva-Leningrad. [In Russian.]Google Scholar
Krcmar-Nozic, E., Wilson, B., and Arthur, L. 2000. The potential impacts of exotic forest pests in North America. Canadian Forestry Service Pacific Forest Research Centre Information Report BC-X-387F.Google Scholar
Lindberg, H. 1948. On the insect fauna of Cyprus. Results of the expedition of 1939 by Harald Håkan and P.H. Lindberg. II. Heteroptera und Homoptera Cicadina der Insel Zypern. Commentationes Biologicae Societas Scientarium Fennica, 10: 23–175.Google Scholar
Mulsant, E., and Rey, C. 1872. Etude sur les espèces du genre Orsillus. De la famille des Lygéens, ordre des Hémiptères. Annales de la Société linnéene de Lyon, 18: 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Péneau, J. 1927. Notes sur quelques Hémiptères de l'Anjou. Bulletin de la Société d'études Scientifiques d'Angers, 56: 99–103.Google Scholar
Péricart, J. 1998. Hémiptères Lygaeidae euroméditerranéens. Faune de France. France et régions limitrophes. Vol. 1. Fédération Française des Sociétés de Sciences Naturelles, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Ramos, P., and Caetano, F. 1999. Situaçoes preocupantes das Arvores em Jardins e Arruamentos de Portugal o cancro cortical dos Ciprestes. Silva Lusitana, 7: 249–256.Google Scholar
Rasplus, J.Y., Carcreff, E., Cornuet, J.M., and Roques, A. 2000. Genetic structure of the cypress seed chalcid Megastigmus wachtli (Torymidae) within its Mediterranean distribution. In Hymenoptera: evolution, biodiversity and biological control. Edited by Austin, A.D. and Dowton, M.. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia. pp. 114–130.Google Scholar
Reichling, L. 1988. Punaises des Genévriers trouvées sur Faux Cyprès (Heteropt.). Entomologiste (Paris), 44: 46.Google Scholar
Roques, A. 1983. Les insectes ravageurs des cônes et des graines de conifères en France. INRA Editions, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Roques, A., and Battisti, A. 1999. Cypress insect pests. In Cypress. A practical handbook. Edited by du Cros, E. Teissier, Ducrey, M., Barthelemy, D., Pichot, C., Giannini, R., Raddi, P., Roques, A., Luis, J. Sales, and Thibaut, B.. Studio Leonardo, Florence, Italy. pp. 74–95.Google Scholar
Roques, A., and Skrzypczynska, M. 2003. Seed-infecting chalcids of the genus Megastigmus Dalman, 1820 (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) native and introduced to the West Palearctic region: taxonomy, host specificity and distribution. Journal of Natural History, 37: 127–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roques, A., Carcreff, E., and Rasplus, J.Y. 1999 a. Cupressus sempervirens vs. cypress seed chalcid, Megastigmus wachtli: genetic and evolutionary relationships. In Proceedings of the IUFRO S7.01 Symposium “Physiology and genetics of treephytophage interactions”, Arcachon, France, 31 August – 5 September 1997. Les Colloques de l'INRA 90. INRA Editions, Paris, France. pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
Roques, A., Markalas, S.D., Roux, G., Pan, Y.Z., Sun, J.H., and Raimbault, J.-P. 1999 b. Impact of insects damaging seed cones of cypress, Cupressus sempervirens, in natural stands and plantations of southeastern Europe. Annals of Forest Science, 56: 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouault, G. 2002. Biologie et répartition des punaises du genre Orsillus associées aux Cupressaceae: une étude de l'impact d'un pathogène introduit sur les interactions cônesinsectes. Ph.D. thesis, Université d'Orléans, France.Google Scholar
Rouault, G., Roversi, P.F., Cantini, R., Battisti, A., Bouaziz, K., and Roques, A. 2000. First record of an egg parasitoid (Telenomus gr. floridanus, Hymenoptera Scelionidae) of two true seed bugs (Heteroptera: Lygaeidae) living on Cupressaceae. Redia, 83: 163–173.Google Scholar
Schuh, R.T., and Slater, J.A. 1995. True bugs of the world (Hemiptera: Heteroptera): classification and natural history. Cornell University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Strout, R.G. 1970. Coryneum canker of Cupressus. Plant Pathology, 19: 149–150.Google Scholar
Teissier du Cros, E., Ducrey, M., Barthélémy, D., Pichot, C., Giannini, R., Raddi, P. et al. 1999. Cypress. A practical handbook. Studio Leonardo, Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
Wagener, W.W. 1939. The canker of Cupressus induced by Coryneum cardinale n. sp. Journal of Agricultural Research, 58: 1–46.Google Scholar
Zar, J.H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis. 4th ed. Prentice-Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.Google Scholar