Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:20:34.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The genus Xanthogramma Schiner, 1861 (Diptera: Syrphidae) in southeastern Europe, with descriptions of two new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

Zorica Nedeljković ,
Antonio Ricarte ,
Ljiljana Šašić Zorić ,
Mihajla Đan ,
Dragana Obreht Vidaković  and
Ante Vujić
Zorica Nedeljković*
Affiliation:
BioSense Institute-Research Institute for Information Technologies in Biosystems, Dr Zorana Đinđića 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Antonio Ricarte
Affiliation:
BioSense Institute-Research Institute for Information Technologies in Biosystems, Dr Zorana Đinđića 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Ljiljana Šašić Zorić
Affiliation:
BioSense Institute-Research Institute for Information Technologies in Biosystems, Dr Zorana Đinđića 1, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Mihajla Đan
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Dragana Obreht Vidaković
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
Ante Vujić
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Sciences, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 2, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia
*
2Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Examination of 122 specimens of Xanthogramma Schiner, 1861 (Diptera: Syrphidae) from varied localities in Europe (+Turkey) resulted in the description of two new species (X. aeginae Ricarte, Nedeljković, and Vujić new species and X. pilosum Nedeljković, Ricarte, and Vujić new species), as well as new data on six other species. Most of the examined material originated from the Balkan Peninsula and Greek islands. New species concepts were supported by morphological and molecular evidence. Relationships among the eight studied species were analysed and discussed based on the data of nuclear (ITS2) and mitochondrial (COI) genes sequences. An identification key to the European species of Xanthogramma is provided. Lectotypes are designated for Doros decoratum Zetterstedt, 1843, Lasiophthicus novus Rondani, 1857, Syrphus laetus Fabricius, 1794, Syrphus ornatus Meigen, 1822, and Xanthogramma nobilitatum Frey, 1946.

Type
Systematics & Morphology
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 150 , Issue 4 , August 2018 , pp. 440 - 464
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: Centro Iberoamericano de la Biodiversidad (CIBIO), Universidad de Alicante, carretera de San Vicente del Raspeig s/n, 03690 San Vicente del Raspeig, Alicante, Spain

Subject editor: Bradley Sinclair

http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:53B81D19-7A8C-4F11-8032-0C466650A526

References

Ačanski, J., Vujić, A., Đan, M., Obreht Vidaković, D., Ståhls, G., and Radenković, S. 2016. Integrative taxonomy in defining species boundaries in Merodon avidus complex (Diptera: Syrphidae). European Journal of Taxonomy, 237: 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.237.Google Scholar
Andrić, A., Šikoparija, B., Obreht, D., Đan, M., Preradović, J., Radenković, S., et al. 2014. DNA barcoding applied: identifying the larva of Merodon avidus (Diptera: Syrphidae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae, 54: 741–757.Google Scholar
Bartsch, H., Binkiewicz, E., Klintbjer, A., Rådén, A., and Nasibov, E. 2009. Blomflugor: Syrphinae. Nationalnyckelntill Sveriges frola och fauna, Artdatabanken. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Beebe, N.W. and Saul, A. 1995. Discrimination of all members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 53: 478–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bezzi, M. and Stein, P. 1907. Cyclorrapha Aschiza. Cyclorrapha Schizophora: Schizometopa. In Katalog deb Paläarktischen Dipteren. Edited by T. Becker, M. Bezzi, and P. Stein. Dugonics-nyomda Részvénytársaság Szeged, Budapest, Hungary. Pp. 1–842.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Rangasamy, M., Tan, S.Y., Wang, H., and Siegfried, B.D. 2010. Evaluation of five methods for total DNA extraction from western corn rootworm beetles. Public Library of Science One, 5: e11963. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011963.Google ScholarPubMed
Chroni, A., Djan, M., Obreht Vidaković, D., Petanidou, T., and Vujić, A. 2017. Molecular species delimitation in the genus Eumerus (Diptera: Syrphidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 107: 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485316000729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coe, R.L. 1957. Some new Syrphidae (Diptera) from Yugoslavia. Proceedings of the Royal Entomological Society of London (B), 26: 60–62.Google Scholar
Coquillett, D.W. 1910. Corrections to my paper on the type-species of the North American genera of Diptera. The Canadian Entomologist, 42: 375–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crnobrnja-Isailović, J. 2007. Cross-section of a refugium: genetic diversity of amphibian and reptile populations in the Balkans. In Phylogeography of southern European refugia. Edited by S. Weiss and N. Ferrand. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. Pp. 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Geer, C. 1776. Memoires pour servir a l’histoire des insectes. Volume 6. P. Hesselberg, Stockholm, Sweden.Google Scholar
Dušek, J. and Láska, P. 1967. Versuch zum aufbau eines Naturlichen Systems mitteleuropaischer Arten der Unterfamilie Syrphinae (Diptera). Acta scientiarum naturalium Academiae Scientiarum Bohemicae, Brno, 1: 349–390.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1794. Entomologia systematica emendata et aucta. Secundum classes, ordines, genera, species adjectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Volume 4. C.G. Proft, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Frey, R. 1946. Übersicht der Gattungen der Syrphiden-Unterfamilie Syrphinae (Syrphine+Bacchinae). Notulae Entomologicae, 25: 152–172.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P. 1999. NONA computer program. Version 2.0. Tucumac, Argentina [online]. Available from www.softpedia.com/get/Science-CAD/NONA.shtml [accessed 21 March 2018].Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., Farris, J.S., and Nixon, K.C. 2008. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics, 24: 774–786. Available from www.lillo.org.ar/phylogeny/tnt [accessed 10 March 2018].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grković, A., Vujić, A., Radenković, S, Chroni, A., and Petanidou, T. 2015. Diversity of the genus Eumerus Meigen (Diptera, Syrphidae) on the eastern Mediterranean islands with description of three new species. Annales de la Société entomologique de France (N.S.), 51: 361–373. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2016.1144483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haarto, A. and Ståhls, G. 2014. When mtDNA COI is misleading: congruent signal of ITS2 molecular marker and morphology for North European Melanostoma Schiner, 1860 (Diptera, Syrphidae). Zookeys, 431: 93–134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.431.7207.Google Scholar
Hall, T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symposia, 41: 95–98.Google Scholar
Harris, M. 1776. An exposition of English insects, with curious observations and remarks, wherein each insect is particulary described; its parts and properties considered; the different sexes distinguished, and the natural history faithfully related. The whole illustrated with copper plates, drawn, engraved and coloured, by the author. Privately published, London, United Kingdom.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölldobler, K. 1929. Über die Entwicklung der Schwierfleige Xanthogramma citrofasciatum im Neste von Lasius alienus und niger. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 82: 171–176.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 1999. International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, 4th edition. The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. 2001. Opinion 1982 (case 3090). Musca arcuata Linnaeus, 1758 and M. festiva Linnaeus, 1758 (currently Chrysotoxum arcuatum and C. festivum) and M. citrofasciata De Geer, 1776 (currently Xanthogramma citrofasciatum) (Insecta: Diptera): specific names conserved by the designation of neotypes for M. arcuata and M. festiva . Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature, 58: 241–242.Google Scholar
Katoh, K. and Standley, D.M. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 30: 772–780. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst010.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Láska, P., Mazánek, L., and Bičík, V. 2013. Key to adults and larvae of the genera of European Syrphinae (Diptera, Syrphidae). Časopis Slezského Zemského Muzea (A), 62: 193–206.Google Scholar
Librado, P. and Rozas, J. 2009. DnaSP v5: A software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics, 25: 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loew, H. 1854. Neue Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Dipteren. Zweiter Beitrag. Programm K. Realschule Meseritz, 1854: 1–24.Google Scholar
Marcos-García, M.A., Vujić, A., Ricarte, A., and Ståhls, G. 2011. Towards an integrated taxonomy of the Merodon equestris species complex (Diptera: Syrphidae) including description of a new species, with additional data on Iberian Merodon . The Canadian Entomologist, 143: 332–348. http://dx.doi.org/10.4039/n11-013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWilliam, H., Li, W., Uludag, M., Squizzato, S., Park, M.Y., Buso, N., et al. 2013. Analysis tool web services from the EMBL-EBI. Nucleic Acids Research, 41: W597–W600. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meigen, J.W. 1822. Systematische Beschreibung der bekannten europäischen zweiflügeligen Insekten. Hamm, 3: X+1–416.Google Scholar
Meigen, J.W. 1835. Neue Arten von Diptera aus der Umgegend von München, benannt und beschrieben von Meigen, aufgefunden von Dr. J. Waltl. In Faunus 2. Edited by J. Gistel. Lindauer’sche Verlagsbuchhaudlung, Munich, Germany. Pp. 66–72.Google Scholar
Mengual, X. 2012. The flower fly genus Citrogramma Vockeroth (Diptera: Syrphidae): illustrated revision with descriptions of new species. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 164: 99–172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00750.x..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mengual, X., Ståhls, G., and Rojo, S. 2008. First phylogeny of predatory flower flies (Diptera, Syrphidae, Syrphinae) using mitochondrial COI and nuclear 28S rRNA genes: conflict and congruence with the current tribal classification. Cladistics, 24: 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2008.00200.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mik, J. 1897. Einige Bemerkungen zur Dipteren-Familie der Syrphiden. Wiener Entomologische Zeitung, 16: 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedeljković, Z., Ačanski, J., Đan, M., Obreht-Vidaković, D., Ricarte, A., and Vujić, A. 2015. An integrated approach to delimiting species borders in the genus Chrysotoxum Meigen, 1803 (Diptera: Syrphidae), with description of two new species. Contributions to Zoology, 84: 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nedeljković, Z., Ačanski, J., Vujić, A., Obreht, D., Đan, M., Ståhls, G., and Radenković, S. 2013. Taxonomy of Chrysotoxum festivum Linnaeus, 1758 (Diptera: Syrphidae) – an integrative approach. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 169: 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, K.C. 1999. The parsimony ratchet, a new method for rapid parsimony analysis. Cladistics, 15: 407–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nixon, K.C. 2008. ASADO, version 1.85 TNT-MrBayes Slaver version 2; mxram 200 (vl 5.30). Made available through the author (previously named WinClada, version 1.00.08 (2002)). Available from www.diversityoflife.org/winclada [accessed 21 March 2018].Google Scholar
Pape, T. and Thompson, F.C. 2013a. Systema Dipterorum, version 1.5 [online]. Available from www.diptera.org [accessed 2 November 2016].Google Scholar
Pape, T. and Thompson, F.C. 2013b. Xanthogramma Schiner 1860. Systema Dipterorum, version 1.5 [online]. Available from www.diptera.org [accessed 27 November 2017].Google Scholar
Parks, D.H., Mankowski, T., Zangooei, S., Porter, M.S., Armanini, D.G., Baird, D.J., et al. 2013. GenGIS 2: geospatial analysis of traditional and genetic biodiversity, with new gradient algorithms and an extensible plugin framework. Public Library of Science One, 8: e69885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069885.Google Scholar
Peck, L.V. 1988. Syrphidae. In Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera. Edited by A. Soos and L. Papp. Akademia Kiado, Budapest, Hungary. Pp. 1–327.Google Scholar
Popović, D., Ačanski, J., Djan, M., Obreht, D., Vujić, A., and Radenković, S. 2015. Sibling species delimitation and nomenclature of the Merodon avidus complex (Diptera: Syrphidae). European Journal of Entomology, 112: 790–809. https://doi.org/10.14411/eje.2015.100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulakakis, N., Kapli, P., Lymberakis, P., Trichas, A., Vardinoyiannis, K., Sfenthourakis, S., and Mylonas, M. 2015. A review of phylogeographic analyses of animal taxa from the Aegean and surrounding regions. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research, 53: 18–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radenković, S., Vujić, A., Ståhls, G., Pérez-Bañón, C., Petanidou, T., and Šimić, S. 2011. Three new cryptic species of the genus Merodon Meigen (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the Island of Lesvos (Greece). Zootaxa, 2735: 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricarte, A. and Marcos García, M.A. 2017. A checklist of the Syrphidae (Diptera) of Spain, Andorra and Gibraltar. Zootaxa, 4216: 401–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rondani, C. 1857. Dipterologiae Italicae Prodromus, 2. Species italicae ordinis Dipterorum in genera characteribus definita, ordinatim collectae, methodo analitica distinctae, et novis vel minus cognitis descriptis. Pars prima. Oestridae: Syrphidae: Conopidae. Tipographia Alexandri Stocim, Parma, Italy.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. 1807. Fauna Estrusca. Sistens insecta quae in provinciis Frolentina et Pisana praesertim collegit Petrus Rossius (Mantissae priore parte adjecta), iterum edita et annotatis aucta. Edition 2, Volume 2. Typis Thomae Masi & Sociorum. Praesidum Facultate, Helmstedt, Germany.Google Scholar
Rotheray, G.E. 1994. Colour guide to hoverfly larvae (Diptera, Syrphidae) in Britain and Europe. Dipterists Digest, 9: 1–156.Google Scholar
Rotheray, G.E and Gilbert, F. 2011. The natural history of hoverflies. Forrest Text, Ceredigion, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Šašić, Lj., Ačanski, J., Vujić, A., Ståhls, G., Radenković, S. , S., Milić, D., et al. 2016. Molecular and morphological inference of three cryptic species within the Merodon aureus species group (Diptera: Syrphidae). Public Library of Science One, 11: e0160001. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160001.Google ScholarPubMed
Savić, I.R. 2008. Diversification of the Balkan fauna: its origin, historical development and present status. Advances in Arachnology and Developmental Biology, 12: 57–78.Google Scholar
Schiner, I.R. 1860. Vorlaufiger Commentar zum dipterologischen Theile der ‘Fauna Austriaca’, mit einer naheren Begrundung der in derselben aufgenommenen neuen Dipteren-Gattungen. II. Wiener Entomologische Monatsschrift, 4: 208–216.Google Scholar
Schiner, I.R. 1861. Fauna Austriaca: die Fliegen (Diptera) Nach der analytischen Methode bearb., mit der Characteristik almmilicher europäischer Gattungen, der Beechraibung aller in Deutschland vorkommenden Arten und der Aufzahlung aller bisher beschriebenen europaischen Arten. C. Gerolds Sohn, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., and Flook, P. 1994. Evolution, weighting and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 87: 651–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speight, M.C.D. 2017. Species accounts of European Syrphidae 2017. Syrph the Net, the Database of European Syrphidae (Diptera), 97: 1–294.Google Scholar
Speight, M.C.D. and Sarthou, J.-P. 2017. StN keys for the identification of the European species of various genera of Syrphidae 2017/Clés StN pour la détermination des espèces Européennes de plusieurs genres des Syrphidae 2017. Syrph the Net, the Database of European Syrphidae (Diptera), 99: 1−139.Google Scholar
Speight, M.C.D. and Sommaggio, D. 2010. On the presence in Switzerland of Microdon myrmicae Schönrogge et al., 2002, Xanthogramma dives (Rondani, 1857) and X. stackelbergi Violovitsh, 1975 (Diptera: Syrphidae). Entomo Helvetica, 3: 139–145.Google Scholar
Ståhls, G., Vujić, A., Pérez-Bañón, C., Radenković, S., Rojo, S., and Petanidou, T. 2009. COI barcodes for identification of Merodon hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of Lesvos Island, Greece. Molecular Ecology, 9: 1431–1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02592.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobl, G. 1899. Spanische Dipteren.V. Theil. Wiener Entomologische Zeitung, 18: 144–148.Google Scholar
Szilády, Z. 1940. Über paläarktische Syrphiden. IV. Annales Musei historico-naturalis hungarici. Pars Zoologica, 33: 54–70.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.C. 1999. A key to the genera of the flower flies of the Neotropical Region including the descriptions of genera and species and a glossary of taxonomic terms. Contributions on Entomology, International, 3: 319–378.Google Scholar
Thompson, F.C and Rotheray, G.E. 1998. Family Syrphidae. In Contributions to a manual of Palaearctic Diptera. Higher Brachycera. Edited by L. Papp and B. Darvas B. Science Herald, Budapest, Hungary. Pp. 91–139.Google Scholar
Van Veen, M.P. 2004. Hoverflies of northwest Europe: identification keys to the Syrphidae. KNNV Publishing, Utrecht, The Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Violovitsh, N.A. 1975. Краткии обзор палеарктичерских видов рода Xanthogramma Schiner (Diptera, Syrphidae). [Brief survey of Palaearctic species of the genus Xanthogramma Schiner (Diptera, Syrphidae)]. Novye i Maloizvestiye Vidy Fauny Sibiri, 9: 90–106.Google Scholar
Vockeroth, J.R. 1969. A revision of the genera of the Syrphini (Diptera: Syrphidae). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada, 62: 1–176.Google Scholar
Vujić, A. and Glumac, S. 1994. Fauna of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) of Fruška gora. Monografije Fruške gore. Matica srpska, Novi Sad, Serbia.Google Scholar
Vujić, A., Radenković, S., Ačanski, J., Grković, A., Taylor, M., Gökhan, S., and Hayat, R. 2015. Revision of the species of the Merodon nanus group (Diptera: Syrphidae) including three new species. Zootaxa, 4006: 439–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vujić, A., Šimić, S., Milankov, V., Radović, D., Radišić, P., and Radnović, D. 1998. Fauna Syrphidae (Insecta: Diptera) of Obedska bara: importance and need of protection. Institute of Nature Protection of Serbia, Novi Sad, Serbia.Google Scholar
Vujić, A., Šimić, S., and Radenković, S. 2001. Endangered species of hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) on the Balkan Peninsula. Acta Entomologica Serbica, 5: 93–105.Google Scholar
Vujić, A., Ståhls, G., Ačanski, J., Bartsch, H., Bygebjerg, R., and Stefanović, A. 2013. Systematics of Pipizini and taxonomy of European Pipiza Fallén: molecular and morphological evidence (Diptera, Syrphidae). Zoologica Scripta, 42: 288–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williston, S.W. 1887. Synopsis of the North American Syrphidae. Bulletin of the United States National Museum, 31: 1–335.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J.W. 1843. Diptera Scandinaviae, deposita et descripta. Volume 2. Officina Lundbergiana, Lund, Sweden. Pp. 441–894.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nedeljković et al. supplementary material

Nedeljković et al. supplementary material 1

Download Nedeljković et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.2 KB