Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:01:16.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Garden substrate preparation behaviours in fungus-growing ants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

D.M. Mangone  and
C.R. Currie
D.M. Mangone
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States of America
C.R. Currie*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, United States of America and Department of Bacteriology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin 53706, United States of America
*
2 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: tribe Attini) engage in mutually beneficial symbioses with fungi (Basidiomycota) that serve as their main food source. The leaf-cutters (genera Acromyrmex Mayr and Atta Fabricius), the most derived attine ants, employ elaborate nest-hygiene behaviours, including substrate preparation. By preparing substrate prior to its incorporation into the fungus garden, workers facilitate the physical breakdown of leaf material while reducing the abundance of potentially harmful microbes that contact their fungal mutualist. Despite its importance in ant fungiculture, substrate preparation has not been investigated in other genera of fungus-growing ants. We examined substrate-preparation procedures used by five genera of fungus-growing ants (Apterostigma Mayr, Cyphomyrmex Mayr, Trachymyrmex Forel, Acromyrmex, and Atta) representing most of the phylogenetic range of the Attini. Behavioural observations revealed that all five genera engage in substrate-preparation behaviours. Furthermore, these behaviours vary by genus, with Trachymyrmex, Acromyrmex, and Atta engaging in more elaborate preparation behaviours than the other genera. Additionally, we found that during substrate preparation, leaf-cutting ants inoculate leaf fragments with actinomycetous bacteria. These filamentous bacteria are known to produce antibiotics that suppress fungal pathogens, which suggests that inoculation with the bacterial mutualist during substrate preparation helps protect the fungus gardens of leaf-cutter ants from these parasites. Our finding that substrate-preparation behaviours occur across the phylogenetic range of attine ants suggests that these behaviours are a critical component of successful fungiculture by ants.

Résumé

Les fourmis champignonistes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: tribu Attini) établissent une symbiose mutuellement bénéfique avec les champignons (Basidiomycota) qui constituent leur principale source de nourriture. Les coupeuses de feuilles (des genres Acromyrmex Mayr et Atta Fabricius), les fourmis les plus évoluées des Attini, utilisent des comportements hygiéniques complexes, en particulier la préparation des substrats. En préparant le substrat avant son incorporation à la culture de champignons, les ouvrières facilitent la décomposition physique du matériel foliaire, tout en réduisant l’abondance des microorganismes potentiellement dangereux qui entrent en contact avec le champignon symbiotique. Malgré l’importance de la préparation des substrats dans la fongiculture des fourmis, personne ne l’a étudiée chez les autres genres de fourmis champignonistes. Nous examinons ici les procédures de préparation des substrats chez cinq genres de fourmis champignonistes (Apterostigma Mayr, Cyphomyrmex Mayr, Trachymyrmex Forel, Acromyrmex et Atta), qui représentent l’essentiel de la gamme de diversité phylogénétique chez les Attini. Des observations comportementales montrent que les cinq genres possèdent tous des comportements de préparation des substrats. De plus, ces comportements varient d’un genre à l’autre et ce sont Trachymyrmex, Acromyrmex et Atta qui ont les comportements de préparation les plus élaborés. Aussi, durant la préparation des substrats, nous avons observé les fourmis coupeuses de feuilles inoculer les fragments de feuilles de bactéries actinomycètes. Ces bactéries filamenteuses sont connues pour leur production d’antibiotiques qui inhibent les pathogènes des champignons, ce qui laisse croire que l’inoculation de cette bactérie symbiotique durant la préparation des substrats aide à protéger les cultures de champignons des fourmis coupeuses de feuilles de leurs parasites. Notre observation des comportements de préparation des substrats dans tout l’éventail phylogénétique des fourmis de la tribu Attini indique que ces comportements sont une composante essentielle d’une fongiculture réussie chez les fourmis.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 139 , Issue 6 , December 2007 , pp. 841 - 849
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrade, A.P.P., Forti, L.C., Moreira, A.A., Boaretto, M.A.C., Ramos, V.M., and de Matos, C.A.O. 2002. Behaviour of Atta sexdens rubropilosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) workers during the preparation of the leaf substrate for symbiont fungus culture. Sociobiology, 40: 293–306.Google Scholar
Cafaro, M., and Currie, C.R. 2005. Phylogenetic analysis of mutualistic filamentous bacteria associated with fungus-growing ants. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 51: 441–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapela, I.H., Rehner, S.A., Schultz, T.R., and Mueller, U.G. 1994. Evolutionary history of the symbiosis between fungus-growing ants and their fungi. Science (Washington, District of Columbia), 266: 1691–1694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, C.R., and Stuart, A.E. 2001. Weeding and grooming of pathogens in agriculture by ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society London Series B: Biological Sciences, 268: 1033–1039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, C.R., Mueller, U.G., and Malloch, D. 1999 a. The agricultural pathology of ant fungus gardens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96: 7998–8002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, C.R., Scott, J.A., Summerbell, R.C., and Malloch, D. 1999 b. Fungus-growing ants use antibiotic-producing bacteria to control garden parasites. Nature (London), 398: 701–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, C.R., Bot, A.N.M., and Boomsma, J.J. 2003 a. Experimental evidence of a tripartite mutualism: bacteria protect ant fungus gardens from specialized parasites: Oikos, 101: 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, C.R., Wong, B., Stuart, A.E., Schultz, T.R., Rehner, S.A., Mueller, U.G., Sung, G., Spatafora, J.W., and Straus, N.A. 2003 b. Ancient tripartite coevolution in the attine ant–microbe symbiosis. Science (Washington, District of Columbia), 299: 386–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, C.R., Poulsen, M., Mendenhall, J., Boomsma, J.J., and Billen, J. 2006. Coevolved crypts and exocrine glands support mutualistic bacteria in fungus-growing ants. Science (Washington, District of Columbia), 311: 81–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisner, T., and Happ, G.M. 1962. The infrabuccal pocket of a formicine ant: a social filtration device. Psyche (Cambridge), 69: 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Febvay, G., and Kermarrec, A. 1981. Morphologie et fonctionnement du filter infrabuccal chez une attine Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): rôle de la poche infrabuccale. International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 10: 441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernandez-Marin, H., Zimmerman, J.K., and Wcislo, W.T. 2004. Ecological traits and evolutionary sequence of nest establishment in fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Attini). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 81: 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E.O. 1990. The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, I.R., and Oliveira, P.S. 2000. Foraging ecology of attine ants in a Neotropical savanna: seasonal use of fungal substrate in the cerrado vegetation of Brazil. Insectes Sociaux, 47: 376–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, A.E.F, Murakami, T., Mueller, U.G., and Currie, C.R. 2003. The infrabuccal pellet piles of fungus-growing ants. Naturwissenschaften, 90: 558–562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, A.E.F., Murakami, T., Mueller, U.G., and Currie, C.R. 2006. Defending against parasites: fungus-growing ants combine specialized behaviours and microbial symbionts to protect their fungus gardens. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biology Letters, 2: 12–16.Google ScholarPubMed
Martin, M.M. 1970. The biochemical basis of the fungus-attine ant symbiosis. Science (Washington, District of Columbia), 169: 16–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, U.G., Rehner, S.A., and Schultz, T.R. 1998. The evolution of agriculture in ants. Science (Washington, District of Columbia), 281: 2034–2038.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulsen, M., and Boomsma, J.J. 2005. Mutualistic fungi control crop diversity in fungus-growing ants. Science (Washington, District of Columbia), 307: 741–744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulsen, M., and Currie, C.R. 2006. Complexity of insect—fungal associations: exploring the influence of microorganisms on the attine ant—fungus symbiosis. In Insect symbiosis. Vol. II. Edited by Bourtzis, K. and Miller, T.. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. pp. 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulsen, M., Bot, A.N.M., Currie, C.R., Nelsen, M.G., and Boomsma, J.J. 2003. Within-colony transmission and the cost of a mutualistic bacterium in the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus Functional Ecology, 17: 260–269.Google Scholar
Quinlan, R.J., and Cherrett, J.M. 1977. The role of substrate preparation in the symbiosis between the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus (Reich) and its food fungus. Ecological Entomology, 2: 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinlan, R.J., and Cherrett, J.M. 1978. Aspects of the symbiosis of the leaf-cutting ant Acromyrmex octospinosus and its food fungus. Ecological Entomology, 3: 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, H.T., and Currie, C.R. 2004. Pathogenicity of Escovopsis weberi: the parasite of the attine ant – microbe symbiosis directly consumes the ant-cultivated fungus. Mycologia, 96: 955–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rønhede, S., Boomsma, J.J., and Rosendahl, S. 2004. Fungal enzymes transferred by leaf-cutting ants in their fungus gardens. Mycological Research, 108: 101–106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, T.R., and Meier, R.A. 1995. A phylogenetic analysis of the fungus-growing ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Attini) based on morphological characters on the larvae. Systematic Entomologist, 20: 337–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villesen, P., Mueller, U.G., Schultz, T.R., Adams, R.M.M., and Bouck, A.C. 2004. Evolution of ant—cultivar specialization and cultivar switching in Apterostigma fungus-growing ants. Evolution, 58: 2252–2265.Google ScholarPubMed
Weber, N.A. 1957. Weeding as a factor in fungus culture by ants. Anatomical Record, 128: 638.Google Scholar
Weber, N.A. 1972. Gardening ants: the attines. The American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar