Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:03:12.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A FURTHER EVALUATION OF THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE PHEROMONES AND TWO HOST KAIROMONES OF THE AMBROSIA BEETLES TRYPODENDRON LINEATUM AND GNATHOTRICHUS SULCATUS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

T. L. Shore  and
J. A. McLean
T. L. Shore
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1W5
J. A. McLean
Affiliation:
Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver V6T 1W5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A Latin square design field experiment using treatment, site, and occasion as main effects was set up in spring 1981 to assess the responses of Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) and Gnathotrichus sulcatus (LeConte) to traps baited with the pheromones lineatin and sulcatol alone and in combination with each other and with ethanol plus α-pinene. Addition of sulcatol to either lineatin or lineatin plus ethanol plus α-pinene resulted in significantly reduced catches of T. lineatum. Addition of ethanol plus α-pinene to sulcatol or lineatin resulted in significantly greater catches of both sexes of G. sulcatus and T. lineatum. These results suggest that separate traps be set out for each species in mass trapping suppression programs in timber processing areas and that ethanol and α-pinene be included with the pheromone to maximize catches of both of these ambrosia beetle species.

Résumé

Un plan expérimental de type carré latin, dont les facteurs principaux étaient le traitement, le site et l'occasion, a été mis à l'essai au printemps de 1981 afin d'évaluer les réponses du Trypodendron linéatum (Olivier) et du Gnathotrichus sulcatus (LeConte) à des pièges appâtés avec les phéromones linéatine et sulcatol, seules et en combinaison l'une avec l'autre ou avec l'éthanol plus l'α-pinène. L'addition de sulcatol soit à la linéatine, ou à la linéatine avec l'éthanol plus l'α-pinène, a causé une réduction significative des captures du T. lineatum. L'addition de l'éthanol plus l'α-pinène au sulcatol ou à la linéatine, a augmenté significativement les captures des 2 sexes des G. sulcatus et T. lineatum. Ces résultats indiquent que des pièges séparés devraient être installés pour ces 2 espèces lors des campagnes de suppression en masse dans les régions entourant les sites de conversion du bois, et que l'éthanol et l'α-pinène devraient être ajoutés à la phéromone afin de maximiser les captures de ces 2 espèces de scolytes du bois.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 115 , Issue 1 , January 1983 , pp. 1 - 5
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakke, A. and Sæther, T.. 1978. Granbarkbillen kan fanges I rorfeller (The spruce bark beetle can be trapped in drainage pipes.) Skogeiren 65: 100.Google Scholar
Bauer, J. and Vité, J. P.. 1975. Host selection by Trypodendron lineatum. Naturwissenschaften 62: 539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. H., Handley, J. R., Johnston, B. D., MacConnell, J. G., Silverstein, R. M., Slessor, K. N., Swigar, A. A., and Wong, D. T. W.. 1979. Synthesis and field testing of lineatin, the aggregation pheromone of Trypodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. chem. Ecol. 5: 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. H., Lindgren, B. S., and Chong, L.. 1980. Ethanol and α-pinene as synergists for the aggregation pheromone of two Gnathotrichus species. Can. J. For. Res. 10: 290–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. H., Chong, L., Slessor, K. N., Oehlschlager, A. C., and Pierce, H. D. Jr., 1981. Allelochemic activity of aggregation pheromones between three sympatric species of ambrosia beetles. Can. Ent. 113: 557–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borden, J. H., King, C. J., Lindgren, B. S., Chong, L., Gray, D. R., Oehlschlager, A. C., Slessor, K. N., and Pierce, H. D. Jr., 1982. Variation in the response of Trypodendron lineatum from two continents to semiochemicals and trap form. Environ. Ent. 11: 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, K. J., Swigar, A. A., Silverstein, R. M., Borden, J. H., and Stokkink, E.. 1974. Sulcatol: population aggregation pheromone in the scolytid beetle Gnathotrichus sulcatus. J. Insect Physiol. 20: 1895–1900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimetzek, V. D., Vité, J. P., and Mori, K.. 1980. Zur Wirkung und Formulierung des Populationslockstoffes des Nutzholzborkenkäfers Trypodendron (Xyloterus) lineatum. Z. angew. Ent. 89: 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacConnell, J. G., Borden, J. H., Silverstein, R. M., and Stokkink, E.. 1977. Isolation and tentative identification of lineatin, a pheromone from the frass of Trvpodendron lineatum (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). J. chem. Ecol. 5: 549–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. A. and Borden, J. H.. 1975. Survey for Gnathotrichus sulcatus in a commercial sawmill with the pheromone sulcatol. Can. J. For. Res. 5: 586–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. A. and Borden, J. H.. 1977. Suppression of Gnathotrichus sulcatus with sulcatol-baited traps in a commercial sawmill and notes on the occurrence of G. retusus and Trypodendron lineatum. Can. J. For. Res. 7: 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. A. and Borden, J. H.. 1979. An operational pheromone-based suppression program for an ambrosia beetle Gnathotrichus sulcatus in a commercial sawmill. J. econ. Ent. 72: 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathers, W. G. 1935. Time of felling in relation to injury from ambrosia beetles, or pinworms. B.C. Lumberman 19(8): 14.Google Scholar
Nijholt, W. W. and Schönhërr, J.. 1976. Chemical response behaviour of scolytids in West Germany and western Canada. Can. For. Serv. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 32: 31–32.Google Scholar
Perry, J. N., Wall, C., and Greenway, A. R.. 1980. Latin square designs in field experiments involving insect sex attractants. Ecol. Ent. 5: 385–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prebble, M. L. and Graham, K.. 1957. Studies of attack by ambrosia beetles in softwood logs on Vancouver Island, British Columbia. For. Sci. 3: 90–112.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P. and Bakke, A.. 1979. Synergism between chemical and physical stimuli in host colonization by an ambrosia beetle. Naturwissenschaften 66: 528–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D. L. 1970. Pheromones of bark beetles. pp. 301–316in Wood, D. L., Silverstein, R. M., and Nakajima, M. (Eds.), Control of Insect Behaviour by Natural Products. Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar