Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:31:35.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Fly of the Archaic Family Nymphomyiidae (Diptera) from North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

F. P. Ide
F. P. Ide
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper describes a new species and genus of fly, Archidipteron walkeri (Nymphomyiidae: Diptera), found in samples seined by screens from the Molus river, New Brunswick, after spraying of the watershed with DDT in oil.

The species is compared with Nymphomyia alba, Tokunaga, of Japan and the affinities of the family discussed. It was concluded that these insects are only distantly related to other Diptera and are probably best considered as belonging in the Archidiptera, a suborder of the Diptera, as proposed by Rohdendorf.

The ecological position of the insects is discussed but definite conclusions are not drawn pending more information on life cycle, particularly of the, as yet unknown, larval stages.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 5 , May 1965 , pp. 496 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, C. P. 1928. The Australian species of the genus Nemopalpus, Psychodidae, Diptera. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 53: 291–294.Google Scholar
Alexander, C. P. 1929. A revision of the American two-winged flies of the psychodid subfamily Bruchomyiinae. Proc. U. S. nat. Mus. 75(7): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, F. M. 1953. The geological history and evolution of insects. Amer. Sci. 41: 256–270.Google Scholar
Christophers, S. R. 1915. The male genitalia of Anopheles. Ind. J. med. Res. 3: 371–394.Google Scholar
Cole, F. R. 1927. A study of the terminal abdominal structures of male diptera (two-winged flies). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. (ser. 4) 116: 397–499.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1920. A comparison of the genitalia of male Hymenoptera, Mecoptera, Neuroptera, Diptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, Homoptera and Strepsiptera with those of lower insects. Psyche, Camb., Mass. 27: 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1925. A phylogenetic study of the thoracic sclerites of the non tipuloid nematocerous Diptera. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 18: 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1926a. The external anatomy of the primitive tanyderid dipteran, Macrochile spectrum Loew., preserved in Baltic amber. Bull. Brooklyn ent. Soc. 21: 1–14.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1926b. A phylogenetic study of the thoracic sclerites of the psychodoid Diptera with remarks on the relationships of the Nematocera. Ent. News 37: 33–39; 65–70.Google Scholar
Crampton, G. C. 1942. The Diptera or true-flies of Connecticut. Guide to the insects of Connecticut. Pt. VI, Fasc. I. State Geol. and Nat. Hist. Survey, Conn. Bull. 64: 10–165.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. 1920. The nomenclature of the parts of the male hypopygium of Diptera nematocera with special reference to mosquitoes. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 14: 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esaki, T. 1956. Iconographia insectorum Japonicorum. Ed. 2 (revised). Hokuryukan Ltd., Tokyo.Google Scholar
Gustafson, J. G. 1950. The origin and evolution of the genitalia of the Insecta. Microentomology 15: 35–67.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1950. Die Larvenformen der Diptera. Vol. 2. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Muir, F. 1912. Two new species of Ascodipteron. Bull. Mus. comp. Zool. 54: 351–366.Google Scholar
Quate, L. W. 1955. A revision of the Psychodidae (Diptera) in America north of Mexico. Univ. Calif., Publ. Ent. 10: 103–273.Google Scholar
Rohdendorf, B. B. 1960. Neue Angaben uber das System der Dipteren. Verh. XI int. Kongr. Ent., Wien 1: 153–158.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1902. The inverted hypopygium of Daryelis and Lapria. Psyche, Camb., Mass. 9: 399–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1903. The terminal abdominal segments of female Tipulidae. J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 11: 177–183.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1933. Morphology of the insect abdomen. Pt. II. The genital ducts and the ovipositor. Smithson. misc. Coll. 89: 1–148.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R. E. 1935. The principles of insect morphology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York and London.Google Scholar
Speijer, E. A. M. 1934. De hypopygia van eenige Agromyzidae, benerens theoretische beschouwingen over de homologieen van de aanhangsels hierran. De Universiteit van Amsterdam. (Doctoral dissertation.)Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1919. The panorpoid complex. Pt. 3. The wing venation. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 44(175): 533–718.Google Scholar
Tillyard, R. J. 1926. The insects of Australia and New Zealand. Angus and Robertson, Sydney.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, M. 1932. A remarkable dipterous insect from Japan, Nymphomyia alba, gen. et sp. nov. Annot. Zool. Jap. 13: 559–569.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, M. 1935. A morphological study of a nymphomyiid fly. Philipp. J. Sci. 56: 127–214.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, M. 1936. The central nervous system, tracheal system and digestive system of a nymphomyiid fly. Philipp. J. Sci. 59: 189–216.Google Scholar
Tokunaga, M. 1959. Illustrated insect larvae of Japan. Hokuryukan Ltd., Tokyo.Google Scholar
Tonnoir, A. L. 1939. Ruwenzori expedition 1934–35, 1 (Psychodidae): 35–80. British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London.Google Scholar
Tonnoir, A. L. 1940. Sur un remarquable organe sexual secondaire chez certain mâles du genre Nemopalpus Macq. avec description d'une espèce nouvelle et d'une autre peu connue, (Diptera: Psychodidae) VI Congr. int. Ent., Madrid (1935) 1: 203–213.Google Scholar
Walker, E. M. 1919. The terminal abdominal structures of orthopteroid insects: a phylogenetic study. Part I. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 12: 267–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, E. M. 1922. The terminal abdominal structures of orthopteroid insects: a phylogenetic study. Part II. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 15: 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar