Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:56:59.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FIELD TEST OF AN AUTOCIDAL CONTROL METHOD WITH THE FERAL MOSQUITO CULEX RESTUANS (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. K. Bracken  and
M. G. Maw
G. K. Bracken
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Winnipeg, Manitoba
M. G. Maw
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Regina, Saskatchewan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An autocidal control method involving attraction of ovipositing females to artificial oviposition sites, rearing and chemical sterilization of adults reared from the collected eggs, and release of sterilized males back into the system was field tested with the mosquito Culex restuans Theobald. This species cannot be cultured continuously. The average weekly percentage of sterile egg rafts was 2.4 (range 0.3–16.0) in the test area where sterile males were released (av. 9620/wk) and 5.3 (range 1.5–30.0) in the area where both sterile males (av. 7000/wk) and untreated females (av. 4590/wk) were released. The low level of sterility achieved is attributed to infiltration of gravid females from outside the experimental areas, poor efficiency in producing sterile males from the collected egg rafts, and the small scale of the test.

A hypothetical model is used to compare theoretical reduction in rates of increase of a population of mosquitoes when various proportions are induced to oviposit in ‘trap’ pools if the eggs trapped are destroyed, reared to produce sterile males for release, or reared to produce sterile males for release in conjunction with larvicidal treatment of uncontrolled breeding areas.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 5 , May 1975 , pp. 465 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Briand, L. J. 1964. A permanent pond for studies of mosquitoes and other aquatic insects. Ecology 45: 365–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. D. and Brust, R. A.. 1972. Mosquitoes of Manitoba. III. Ecology of larvae in the Winnipeg area. Can. Ent. 104: 961–968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E. F. 1960 a. Eradication of the screw-worm fly. Scient. Am. 203: 56–61.Google Scholar
Knipling, E. F. 1960 b. Use of insects for their own destruction. J. econ. Ent. 53: 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knipling, E. F. 1968. The potential role of sterility for pest control, pp. 7–40. In LaBreque, G. C. and Smith, C. N. (Eds.), Principles of insect chemosterilization. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
Maw, M. G. 1970. Capric acid as a larvicide and an oviposition stimulant for mosquitoes. Nature, Lond. 227: 1154–1155.Google Scholar
Maw, M. G. and Bracken, G. K.. 1971. The use of artificial pools in assessing populations of the mosquito Culex restuans Theobald. Proc. ent. Soc. Ont. 102: 78–83.Google Scholar
Meifert, D. W. and LaBreque, G. C.. 1971. Integrated control for the suppression of a population of house flies, Musca domestica L. J. med. Ent. 8: 43–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicholls, C. F. 1970. Some entomological equipment. Information Bull. 2 (2nd ed.). Research Institute, Can. Dep. Agric., Belleville, Ont.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. 1971. An oviposition pheromone associated with the egg rafts of Culex tarsalis. J. econ. Ent. 64: 1038–1041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, R. S., Weidhaas, D. E., Ford, H. R., and Lofgren, C. S.. 1970. Suppression and elimination of an island population of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus with sterile males. Science 168: 1368–1370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Proverbs, M. D., Newton, J. R., and Logan, D. M.. 1969. Codling moth control by release of radiation-sterilized moths in a commercial apple orchard. J. econ. Ent. 62: 1331–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seawright, J. A., Bowman, M. C., and Patterson, R. S.. 1971. Tepa and thiotepa: uptake, persistence, and sterility induced in pupae and adults of Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus. J. econ. Ent. 64: 452–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.. 1967. Statistical methods. 6th ed. Iowa State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Steiner, L. F., Hart, W. G., Harris, E. J., Cunningham, R. T., Ohinata, K., and Kamakahi, D. C.. 1970. Eradication of the oriental fruit fly from the Mariana Islands by the methods of male annihilation and sterile insect release. J. econ. Ent. 63: 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar