Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:42:21.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Field Study of Diapause in Coccinella novemnotata (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)1, 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. D. McMullen
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Summerland, British Columbia

Abstract

There are two generations of Coccinella novemnotata Herbst per year in central California. The adults of the spring generation aestivate and those of the fall generation hibernate. A field study of the physical and biological factors possibly influencing induction of diapause in the adult was conducted. All stages of the spring generation arc subject to a regime of long, increasing photoperiods and increasing mean temperatures, while all stages of the fall generation are subject to a regime of short, decreasing photoperiods and decreasing mean temperatures. In non-irrigated areas with native vegetation the reproductive cycle of this species is synchronized with the availability of prey species. In irrigated agricultural areas prey species are relatively abundant throughout the summer but the adults of the spring generation still aestivate. It is hypothesized that diapause is induced in the adult by both short and long photoperiods and that intermediate photoperiods are required for reproduction.

The biology of C. novemnotata is described briefly with emphasis on the aggregational behavior of the adult.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burcham, L. T. 1957. California range land, an historicoecological study of the range resources of California. Calif. Dep. Nat. Resources Sacramento, Calif., pp. 1261.Google Scholar
Campbell, R. E. 1926. The pea aphid in California. J. agric. Res. 32: 861881.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1954. Studies on summit-frequenting insects in western Montana. Ecology 35: 4149.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. G. 1957. Entomology above the timberline. II. The attraction of ladybird beetles to mountain tops. Coleop. Bull. 11: 4146.Google Scholar
Gordon, A., and Sampson, A. W.. 1940. Composition of common California foothill plants as a factor in range management. Rep. agric. exp. Sta., Univ. of Calif., Bull. No. 627, pp. 195.Google Scholar
Hagen, K. S. 1962. Biology and ecology of predaceous coccinellidae. A. Rev. Ent. 7: 289326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marvin, C. F., and Kimball, H. H.. 1931. Smithsonian meteorological tables, Fifth revised edition. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. Vol. 86, pp. I–XXXVI, 1282.Google Scholar
Masaki, S. 1956. The local variation in the diapause pattern of the cabbage moth, Barathra brassicae Linne, with particular reference to the aestival diapause (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull. Fac. of Agric. Maine Univ. No. 13: 2946.Google Scholar