Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:56:25.450Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FIELD RELEASES OF TRICHOGRAMMA MINUTUM (HYMENOPTERA: TRICHOGRAMMATIDAE) FOR SUPPRESSION OF EPIDEMIC SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE), EGG POPULATIONS IN MAINE1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Mark W. Houseweart
Affiliation:
Cooperative Forestry Research Unit, College of Forest Resources, University of Maine at Orono 04469
Daniel T. Jennings
Affiliation:
Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, University of Maine at Orono 04469
Robert K. Lawrence
Affiliation:
Cooperative Forestry Research Unit, College of Forest Resources, University of Maine at Orono 04469
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Trichogramma minutum Riley was released in the field for suppression of epidemic spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens), egg populations in Maine from 1977 to 1981. Commercially reared California-strain T. minutum were released from the ground at single-point sources in 1977. In 1978, using 4-point-source releases, we found that the native Maine-strain performed better than the California strain. In 1979, broadcast and multiple releases from the ground gave slight improvement in parasitism over 4-point releases. In 1981, three closely timed, aerially broadcast releases from a helicopter yielded increases in parasitism rates significantly higher than those in control plots, but not sufficient to suppress epidemic spruce budworm populations. Important variables and suggestions for future aerial releases are discussed.

Résumé

Trichogramma minutum Riley a été ralâché sur le terrain afin d'éliminer des populations épidémiques d'oeufs de la tordeuse des bourgeons de l'épinette, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) au Maine entre 1977 et 1981. Une souche californienne du T. minutum élevée commercialement a été relâchée à partir de sources comportant un seul point de libération en 1977. En 1978, la souche indigène du Maine a montré une meilleure performance que la souche californienne d'après des lâchers effectués à partir de sources comportant 4 points de libération. En 1979, des lâchers au sol effectués à partir de sources à multiples points de libération ou répétés à plusieurs reprises, ont donné lieu à un parasitisme légèrement plus élevé qu'obtenu avec des lâchers en 4 points. En 1981, trots dispersions effectuées par hélicoptère ont donné des augmentations significatives des taux de parasitisme par rapport aux parcelles témoins, mais non suffisantes pour supprimer les populations épidémiques de tordeuse. La discussion porte sur les variables importantes et sur des suggestions pour des lâchers éventuels.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1984

References

Anderson, J. F. 1976. Egg parasitoids of forest defoliating Lepidoptera. pp. 233–249 in Anderson, J. F. and Kaya, Harry K. (Eds.), Perspectives in Forest Entomology. Academic Press, NY. 428 pp.Google Scholar
Dixon, W. N., Houseweart, M. W., and Jennings, D. T.. 1978. How to examine branches for spruce budworm egg masses. CANUSA/Coop. For. Res. Unit. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Houseweart, M. W., Southard, S. G., and Jennings, D. T.. 1982. Availability and acceptability of spruce budworm eggs to parasitism by the egg parasitoid, Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Can. Ent. 114: 657666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houseweart, M. W., Jennings, D. T., Pease, S. H., and Lawrence, R. K.. Alternate insect hosts and characteristics of forest stands supporting native populations of Trichogramma minutum Riley. Coop. For. Res. Unit, Univ. Maine, Bull. 6. (in press)Google Scholar
Jennings, D. T. and Houseweart, M. W.. 1983. Parasitism of spruce budworm eggs by Trichogramma minutum and absence of overwintering parasitoids. Environ. Ent. 12: 535540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. L., Lewis, W. J., Beroza, M., Bierl, B. A., and Sparks, A. N.. 1973. Host-seeking stimulants (kairomones) for the egg parasite Trichogramma evanescens. Environ. Ent. 2: 593596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, W. P. and Simmons, G. A.. 1978. The influence of stand factors on parasitism of spruce budworm eggs by Trichogramma minutum. Environ. Ent. 7: 685688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, R. K., Houseweart, M. W., Jennings, D. T., Southard, S. G., and Halteman, W. A.. Development of Trichogramma minutum in Choristoneura fumiferana and Sitotroga cerealella host eggs. In progress.Google Scholar
Leonard, D. E., Simmons, G. A., and VanDerwerker, G. K.. 1973. Spruce budworm: Techniques to improve counting of eggs. J. econ. Ent. 66: 992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. J., Jones, R. L., Nordlund, D. A., and Sparks, A. N.. 1975 a. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects: I. Evaluation for increasing rate of parasitization by Trichogramma spp. in the field. J. chem. Ecol. 1: 343348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, W. J., Jones, R. L., Nordlund, D. A., and Gross, H. R. Jr., 1975 b. Kairomones and their use for management of entomophagous insects: II. Mechanisms causing increase in rate of parasitization by Trichogramma spp. J. chem. Ecol. 1: 349360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGugan, B. M. and Blais, J. R.. 1959. Spruce budworm parasite studies in northwestern Ontario. Can. Ent. 91: 758793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. A. 1953. Parasitism of spruce budworm eggs by Trichogramma minutum. Can. Dep. Agric., Sci. Serv., Div. For. Biol., Bi-mon. Progr. Rep. 9(4)4: 1.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A. 1963. Parasites and the spruce budworm. pp. 228–244 in Moms, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Morrison, R. K. and Hoffman, J. D.. 1976. An improved method for rearing the Angoumois grain moth. U.S. Dep. Agric. Res. Serv. S-104. 5 pp.Google Scholar
Morrison, R. K., Stinner, R. E., and Ridgway, R. L.. 1976. Mass production of Trichogramma pretiosum on eggs of the Angoumois grain moth. S. West. Ent. 1: 7480.Google Scholar
Neilson, M. M. 1963. The analysis of egg survival in the unsprayed area. pp. 37–41 in Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31. 332 pp.Google Scholar
Ridgway, R. L., Ables, J. R., Goodpasture, C., and Hartstack, A. W.. 1981. Trichogramma and its utilization for crop protection in the USA. pp. 41–48 in Coulson, J. R. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Joint American-Soviet Conference on Use of Beneficial Organisms in the Control of Crop Pests. Washington, DC, USA, August 13–14, 1979. Ent. Soc. Am. Publ. 62 pp.Google Scholar
Stein, J. D. 1969. Modified tree pruner for twig sampling. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Res. Note RM-130. 2 pp.Google Scholar
Stinner, R. E., Ridgway, R. L., and Kinzer, R. E.. 1974 a. Storage, manipulation of emergence, and estimation of numbers of Trichogramma pretiosum. Environ. Ent. 3: 505507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinner, R. E., Ridgway, R. L., and Morrison, R. K.. 1974 b. Longevity, fecundity, and searching ability of Trichogramma pretiosum reared by three methods. Environ. Ent. 3: 558560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H. A. 1966. Parasitism by Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in the spruce budworm outbreak in Maine. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 723725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar