Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:39:33.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field evaluation of nine families of honey bees for resistance to tracheal mites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Dennis van Engelsdorp  and
Gard W. Otis
Dennis van Engelsdorp
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
Gard W. Otis*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1
*
2 Author to whom all correspondence should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We evaluated the resistance to tracheal mites, Acarapis woodi (Rennie) (Acari: Tarsonemidae), of colonies of honey bees, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae), headed by daughters of three queens from each of three honey bee stocks: (i) British Columbia "mite-resistant stock, (ii) Buckfast "mite-resistant" stock, and (iii) Canadian unselected stock. Colonies of all nine families were distributed among four apiaries; half of the colonies in each apiary were treated with formic acid to attempt to control tracheal mites. The study documented significant differences in resistance to tracheal mites among the families of bees, even within each of the three stocks. After the first 4 months of study (by November 1993), differences in mite infestations had developed among the nine families. Formic acid treatments had either short-lived effectiveness (1993) or no effect (1994) on tracheal mite infestations, thereby eliminating the opportunity to evaluate colony performance in the absence of mites. Mite infestations varied significantly among apiary sites. This study highlights the value of evaluating sets of colonies headed by sister queens when identifying mite-resistant stock for breeding purposes.

Résumé

Nous avons évalué la résistance aux acariens des trachées, Acarapis woodi (Acari : Tarsonemidae), chez des colonies d’abeilles domestiques, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera : Apidae), dont les reines sont les filles de trois reines provenant de trois stocks connus (i) le stock de Colombie-Britannique, « résistant aux acariens » (ii) le stock Buckfast, « résistant aux acariens » et (iii) un stock canadien non sélectionné. Les colonies des neuf familles étaient réparties dans quatre ruchers; dans chaque rucher, la moitié des colonies a été traitée à l’acide formique dans une tentative de lutte contre aux acariens des trachées. Nous avons enregistré des différences significatives dans la résistance aux acariens des trachées d’une famille d’abeille à une autre, même au sein d’un même stock. Après les 4 premiers mois de l’étude (novembre 1993), il y avait déjà des différences dans l’importance des infestations chez les neuf familles. Les traitements à l’acide formique ont eu des effets de courte durée (1993) ou n’ont pas eu d’effet (1994) sur les infestations d’acariens, éliminant par le fait même la possibilité d’évaluer la performance d’une colonie en l’absence d’acariens. Les infestations variaient significativement d’un rucher à l’autre. Cette étude met en évidence l’intérêt d’évaluer des séries de colonies dont les reines sont soeurs lorsqu’on cherche à identifier les stocks résistants aux acariens pour des fins d’élevage.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 133 , Issue 6 , December 2001 , pp. 793 - 803
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, B.r. 1987. Beekeeping at Buckfast Abbey. Hebden Bridge, United Kingdom: Northern Bee BooksGoogle Scholar
Bailey, L. 1958. The epidemiology of the infestation of the honeybee, Apis mellifera L., by the mite Acarapis woodi Rennie and the mortality of infested bees. Parasitology Research 48: 493–506Google Scholar
Bailey, L. 1961. The natural incidence of Acarapis woodi (Rennie) and the winter mortality of honeybee colonies. Bee World 42: 96–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, L., Ball, B.V. 1991. Honey Bee Pathology. 2nd edition. London, United Kingdom: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Bailey, L., Lee, D.C. 1959. The effect of infestation with Acarapis woodi (Rennie) on the mortality of honey bees. Journal of Insect Pathology 1: 15–24Google Scholar
Czerwiński, M., Januszewski, J., Niemczuk, R. 1963. Analiza i ocena wpływu środowiska geograficznego dolnego ślaska na rozprzestrzenianie sie choroby roztoczowej pszczół. Zycie weteryn 3: 19–24 [Cited in Apicultural Abstracts No. 352/65]Google Scholar
Danka, R.G., Villa, J.D. 2000. Inheritance of resistance to Acarapis woodi (Acari: Tarsonemidae) in first-generation crosses of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 1602–5Google Scholar
Danka, R.G., Villa, J.D., Rinderer, T.E., Delatte, G.R. 1995. Field test of resistance to Acarapis woodi (Acari: Tarsonemidae) and of colony production by four stocks of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 88: 584–91Google Scholar
Dawicke, B.L., Otis, G.W., Scott-Dupree, C.D. 1989. Predicting tracheal mite infestations and effects on colonies. American Bee Journal 129: 814Google Scholar
Delfinado-Baker, M. 1984. Acarapis woodi in the United States. American Bee Journal 124: 805–6Google Scholar
Eischen, F.A. 1987. Overwintering performance of honey bee colonies heavily infested with Acarapis woodi (Rennie). Apidologie 18: 293–304Google Scholar
Eischen, F.A., Cardoso-Tamez, D., Wilson, W.T., Dietz, A. 1989. Honey production of honey bee colonies infested with Acarapis woodi (Rennie). Apidologie 20: 1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furgala, B., Duff, S., Aboulfaraj, S., Ragsdale, D., Hyser, R. 1989. Some effects of the honey bee tracheal mite (Acarapis woodi Rennie) on non-migratory, wintering honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies in east central Minnesota. American Bee Journal 129: 195–7Google Scholar
Gary, N.E., Page, R.E. Jr. 1987. Phenotypic variation in susceptibility of honey bees, Apis mellifera, to infestation by tracheal mites, Acarapis woodi. Experimental and Applied Acarology 3: 291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gary, N.E., Page, R.E. Jr, Morse, R.A., Henderson, C.E., Nasr, M.E., Lorenzen, K. 1990. Comparative resistance of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) from Great Britain and United States to infestation by tracheal mites (Acarapis woodi). American Bee Journal 130: 667–9Google Scholar
Guzman-Novoa, E., Zozaya-Rubio, A. 1984. The effects of chemotherapy on the level of infestation and production of honey in colonies of honey bees with acariosis. American Bee Journal 124: 669–72Google Scholar
Guzman, LI de, Rinderer, T.E., Delatte, G.T. 1998. Comparative resistance of four honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) stocks to infestation by Acarapis woodi (Acari: Tarsonemidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 91: 1078–83Google Scholar
Harbo, J.R. 1993. Field and laboratory tests that associate heat with mortality of tracheal mites. Journal of Apicultural Research 32: 159–65Google Scholar
Huxter, E., Clark, K. 1991. Identification and development of Canadian honey bee stocks resistant to tracheal mites. CAFDI (Canadian Agri-Food Development Initiative) Project No. 4075/90–91/E902–162. Interim report, March 1991Google Scholar
Huxter, E., Clark, K. 1992. Identification and development of Canadian honey bee stocks resistant to tracheal mites. CAFDI Project No. 4075/90–91/E902–162. Final report, January 1992Google Scholar
Komeili, A.B., Ambrose, T. 1990. Biology, ecology and damage of tracheal mites on honey bees (Apis mellifera). American Bee Journal 130: 193–9Google Scholar
Lin, H., Otis, G.W., Scott-Dupree, C. 1996. Comparative resistance in Buckfast and Canadian stocks of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) to infestation by honey bee tracheal mites (Acarapis woodi (Rennie)). Experimental and Applied Acarology 20: 87–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loper, G.M., Waller, G.D., Steffens, D., Roselle, R.M. 1992. Selection and controlled natural mating: a solution to the honey bee tracheal mite problem. American Bee Journal 132: 603–6Google Scholar
Margolis, L., Esch, G.W., Holmes, J.C., Kuris, A.M., Schad, G.A. 1982. The use of ecological terms in parasitology. (Report of an ad hoc committee of the American Society of Parasitologists.) Journal of Parasitology 68: 131–3Google Scholar
Milne, C.P. Jr, Otis, G.W., Eischen, F.A., Dormaier, J.M. 1991. A comparison of tracheal mite resistance in two commercially available stocks of honey bees. American Bee Journal 131: 713–8Google Scholar
Nasr, M.E., Otis, G.W., Scott-Dupree, C.D. 1991. Genetic breeding for tracheal mite resistance in Ontario, 1990. Bee Science 1: 122–3Google Scholar
Nasr, M.E., Otis, G.W., Scott-Dupree, C.D. 2001. Tracheal mite resistance in honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae): divergent selection and evaluation. Journal of Economic Entomology 94: 332–8Google Scholar
Niemczuk, R. 1970. Climatic treatment in acarapidosis apium. Acta Parasitologica Polonica 18: 551–4 [Cited in Apicultural Abstracts No. 760/72]Google Scholar
Otis, G.W., Scott-Dupree, C. 1992. Effects of Acarapis woodi on overwintered colonies of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in New York. Journal of Economic Entomology 85: 40–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, R.E., Gary, N.E. 1990. Genotypic variation in susceptibility of honey bees (Apis mellifera) to infestation by tracheal mites (Acarapis woodi). Experimental and Applied Acarology 8: 275–83Google Scholar
Pettis, J.S., Wilson, W.T. 1996. Life history of the honey bee tracheal mite Acarapis woodi (Acari: Tarsonemidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of Amercia 89: 368–74Google Scholar
Sammataro, D., Needham, G.R. 1996. Host-seeking behaviour of tracheal mites (Acari: Tarsonemidae) on honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Experimental and Applied Acarology 20: 121–36Google Scholar
Sammataro, D., Gerson, U., Needham, G. 2000. Parasitic mites of honey bees: life history, implications, and impact. Annual Review of Entomology 45: 519–48CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 6.04. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Institute IncGoogle Scholar
Shimanuki, H., Cantwell, G.E. 1978. Diagnosis of honey bee diseases, parasites, and pests. USDA Publication ARS-NE-87Google Scholar
Szabo, T.I., Lefkovitch, L.P., Clark, K.J. 1991. Comparative resistance of honey bees from a closed population to infestation by tracheal mites. American Bee Journal 128: 740–1Google Scholar
Tomasko, M., Finley, J., Harkness, W., Rajotte, E. 1993. A sequential sampling scheme for detecting the presence of tracheal mite (Acarapis woodi) infestations in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Bulletin No. 871, Pennsylvania State Agriculture Experiment Station, University ParkGoogle Scholar
van Engelsdorp, D. 1995. A field evaluation of nine genetic lines of honey bees for tracheal mite resistance and other economically important traits. MSc thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, CanadaGoogle Scholar
van Engelsdorp, D., Otis, G.W. 2000. Application of a modified selection index for honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 93: 1606–12Google Scholar