Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:25:14.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FEEDING PREFERENCES OF A FLEA BEETLE, PHYLLOTRETA CRUCIFERAE (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE), AMONG WILD CRUCIFERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Palaniswamy Pachagounder  and
Robert J. Lamb
Palaniswamy Pachagounder
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
Robert J. Lamb
Affiliation:
Cereal Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 195 Dafoe Road, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2M9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze), feeds primarily on plants in the Brassicaceae (Cruciferae) (Feeny et al. 1970). Introduced from Europe, it is now a widespread pest of canola, Brassica napus L. and Brassica rapa L., in North America (Lamb and Turnock 1982; Weiss et al. 1991). Before canola occupied so much crop land in western Canada, flea beetles were present and presumably fed mostly on wild crucifers. These native and weedy crucifers are potential sources of resistance genes that might be transferred to canola. We examine feeding preferences of flea beetles among nine wild crucifers (Table 1) to determine which, if any, are avoided. The suitability of these plants has already been examined for another crucifer-feeding chrysomelid, the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana Brown (Gerber and Obadofin 1981; Gerber 1984), and the feeding responses of the beetles are compared.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 130 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 241 - 242
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Feeny, P., Paauwe, K.L., and Demong, N.J.. 1970. Flea beetles and mustard oils: host plant specificity of Phyllotreta cruciferae and P. striolata adults (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 63: 832–841.Google Scholar
Gerber, G.H. 1984. Native host plants of the larvae of the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist 116: 1281–1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, G.H., and Obadofin, A.A.. 1981. The suitability of nine species of Cruciferae as hosts for the larvae of the red turnip beetle, Entomoscelis americana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist 113: 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, R.J., and Tumock, W.J.. 1982. Economics of insecticidal control of flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) attacking rape in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 114: 827–840.Google Scholar
Meisner, J., and Mitchell, B.K.. 1983. Phagodeterrency induced by two cruciferous plants in adults of the flea beetle Phyllotreta striolata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). The Canadian Entomologist 115: 1209–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palaniswamy, P., Lamb, R.J., and McVetty, P.B.E.. 1992. Screening for antixenosis resistance to flea beetles, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in rapeseed and related crucifers. The Canadian Entomologist 124: 895–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, M.J., McLeod, P., Schatz, B.G., and Hanson, B.K.. 1991. Potential for insecticidal management of flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on canola. Journal of Economic Entomology 84: 1597–1603.Google Scholar