Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T12:41:56.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FECUNDITY OF VIRGIN AND MATED APPLE MAGGOT (DIPTERA: TEPHRITIDAE) FEMALES CONFINED WITH APPLE AND BLACK CERESIN WAX DOMES1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. T. A. Neilson
W. T. A. Neilson
Affiliation:
Research Station, Canada Department of Agriculture, Kentville, Nova Scotia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fecundity of apple maggot females was significantly greater (P <.05) on apple than on black ceresin wax domes. Eggs/female laid in apple varied from 24.8 to 318.1 and that in domes from 0.4 to 27.5. Mated females did not lay significantly more eggs than virgins and those confined in groups did not lay significantly more than those confined individually. These findings do not concur with those reported in the literature.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 8 , August 1975 , pp. 909 - 911
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hagen, K. S., Santas, L., and Tsecouras, A.. 1963. A technique of culturing the olive fly, Dacus oleae Gmel. on synthetic media under xenic conditions, pp. 333–356. In Radiation and radioisotopes applied to insects of agriculture importance. Proc. Symp. Athens 22–26 April 1963, IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
McPhail, M. and Guiza, F. E.. 1956. An oviposition medium for the Mexican fruit fly. J. econ. Ent. 49: 570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, W. T. A. 1965. Culturing of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella. J. econ. Ent. 58: 1056–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neilson, W. T. A. and McAllan, J. W.. 1965. Effects of mating on fecundity of the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella (Walsh). Can. Ent. 97: 276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. 1966. Artificial oviposition devices for the apple maggot. J. econ. Ent. 59: 231–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. 1967. Factors influencing effectiveness of artificial oviposition devices for apple maggot. J. econ. Ent. 60: 950–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. and Boller, E. F.. 1970. Artificial egging system for the European cherry fruit fly. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1413–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prokopy, R. J. and Bush, G. L.. 1973. Oviposition by grouped and isolated apple maggot flies. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 66: 1197–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaka, N. 1965. Artificial egging receptacles for three species of tephritid flies. J. econ. Ent. 58: 177–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar