Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:38:56.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

FACTORS AFFECTING CALLING BY FEMALE EASTERN SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. J. Sanders
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
G. S. Lucuik
Affiliation:
Great Lakes Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario

Abstract

Calling (extrusion of the sex pheromone-producing gland) by spruce budworm females follows a circadian rhythm regulated by the initiation of the photophase. At 2 °C 50% of the females call by 131/2 hr after "lights-on." Calling starts earlier at cooler temperatures. Females that have not been exposed to lights-on start calling as soon as darkness occurs. Virgin females are most attractive 3 to 4 days after emergence. Mated females call intermittently and are attractive but compete poorly with virgins. Once started, female budworm call continuously throughout the calling period, implying that their pheromone release rate is lower than if they called for short intervals only as in some other Lepidoptera. This may influence the quantities of synthetic pheromone required to disrupt mating behaviour. Calling behaviour is not influenced by the proximity of other adult budworm. At high population densities, males are apparently able to locate females before or as soon as they start to call, suggesting that communication is short range. Longer distance communication probably operates at low population densities. Population regulation by disrupting mating behaviour is therefore unlikely to succeed except at relatively low population densities.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aplin, R. T. and Birch, M. C.. 1968. Pheromones from the abdominal brushes of male nocturnal Lepidoptera. Nature, Lond. 217: 11271128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, R. S., McGough, J. M., Martin, D. F., and Ball, L. R.. 1964. Some properties and the field evaluation of the pink bollworm sex attractant. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 57: 606609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, M. C. 1970. Pre-courtship use of abdominal brushes by the nocturnal moth Phlogophora meticulosa (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Anim. Behav. 18: 310316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, U. E. and Smithwick, E. B.. 1968. Production and release of sex attractant by the female Indian-meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 61: 12601265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comeau, A. 1971. Physiology of sex pheromone attraction in Tortricidae and other Lepidoptera. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Dickens, G. R. 1936. The scent glands of certain Phycitidae (Lepidoptera). Trans. R. ent. Soc. Lond. 85: 331362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1963. In Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 31, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Grisdale, D. 1970. An improved laboratory method for rearing large numbers of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 102: 11111117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C. A. 1963. In Morris, R. F. (Ed.), The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 31, 332 pp.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1968. Polyandry in spruce budworm. Can. Dep. Forest. Bi-mon. Res. Notes 24: 67.Google Scholar
Outram, I. 1971. Aspects of mating in the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 11211128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Percy, J. E. and Weatherston, J.. 1971. Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. IX. Morphology and histology of the pheromone producing glands of some female lepidoptera. Can. Ent. 103: 17331739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1969. Extrusion of the female sex pheromone gland in the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 101: 760762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1971 a. Daily activity patterns and sex pheromone specificity as sexual isolating mechanisms in two species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 498502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1971 b. Laboratory bioassay of the sex pheromone of the female eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 631637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H. and Gaston, L. K.. 1965. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. VII. Quantitative aspects of the production and release of pheromone by females of Trichoplusia ni (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 58: 604608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H., Gaston, L. K., and Saario, C. A.. 1967. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XIV. Feasibility of behavioral control by disrupting pheromone communication in cabbage loopers. J. econ. Ent. 60: 15411545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1954. A partial breakdown of temporal and ecological isolation between Choristoneura species (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Evolution 8: 206224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sower, L. L. 1970. Quantification and circadian regulation of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni (Noctuidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Calif., Riverside.Google Scholar
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1970. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXI. Light, dark cycle regulation and light inhibition of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 63: 10901092.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sower, L. L., Shorey, H. H., and Gaston, L. K.. 1971. Sex pheromones of noctuid moths. XXV. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on circadian rhythms of sex pheromone release by females of Trichoplusia ni. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 64: 488492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherston, J. and Percy, J. E.. 1969. Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. II. Some observations on the scent pencils of male Vitula edmansae (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae). Can. Ent. 101: 280285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherston, J., Roelofs, W., Comeau, A., and Sanders, C. J.. 1971. Studies of physiologically active arthropod secretions. X. Sex pheromone of the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 17411747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar