Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:54:49.758Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EXPERIMENTAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS OF THE FEEDING RATE OF THE BLOWFLY PHORMIA REGINA (DIPTERA: CALLIPHORIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. J. Thomson  and
C. S. Holling
A. J. Thomson
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
C. S. Holling
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The feeding rate of Phormia regina is constant over the whole feeding period, contra-pressure of the crop contents having no effect. The mechanism by which contra-pressure effects are negated involves the function of two previously undescribed structures in the crop and crop duct. These structures, described in the text, act as valves and a pump. An alternative mechanism, by which contra-pressure effects could be negated in insects lacking these structures, is discussed. The physical effects of variation in the feeding position of the labellum, in response to changes in the physical nature of the substrate, are discussed in relation to the feeding rate. The feeding rate is shown to be higher on semi-liquid substrates.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 107 , Issue 2 , February 1975 , pp. 167 - 173
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berridge, M. J. 1966. Metabolic pathways of isolated malpighian tubules of the blowfly functioning in an artificial medium. J. Insect Physiol. 12: 1523–1538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolwig, N. 1952. Hunger reaction of flies (Musca) and the functions of their stomatogastric system. Nature 169: 197–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davey, K. G. 1964. The control of visceral muscles in insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 2: 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. 1930. Further observations on the anatomy and function of the proboscis of the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala L. Parasitology 22: 47–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham-Smith, G. S. 1934. The alimentary canal of Calliphora with special reference to its musculature. Parasitology 26: 177–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1964. An analysis of complex processes. Can. Ent. 96: 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 48. 86 pp.Google Scholar
Rice, M. J. 1970. Cibarial stretch receptors in the tsetse fly and the blowfly. J. Insect Physiol. 16: 277–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rice, M. J. and Finlayson, L. H.. 1972. Response of blowfly cibarial pump receptors to sinusoidal stimulation. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 841–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, A. J. and Holling, C. S.. 1974. Experimental component analysis of blowfly feeding behaviour. J. Insect Physiol. 20: 1553–1563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed