Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:58:33.309Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVOLUTION OF AEDEAGAL PARAMERES OF ALEOCHARINE STAPHYLINIDS (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE: ALEOCHARINAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

James S. Ashe
James S. Ashe
Affiliation:
Snow Entomological Museum, Snow Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA 66045
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The structure of the parameres (lateral lobes) of aleocharine aedeagi was examined in detail, with special attention to the basal lineages. Paramere structure was compared in the context of a hypothesis of phylogeny of the basal lineages of the Aleocharinae and the Tachyporine Group of subfamilies. The ancestor of all contemporary aleocharines had parameres with the following characteristics: dorsobasal and ventrobasal lobes of more similar size than in extant higher aleocharines; dorsobasal lobe (condylite) continuous with distal lobe (not articulated); a striated velum (velar sac), extended from near the base of the dorsobasal lobe to near the apex of the distal lobe and derived from the dorsal surface of the distal lobe; distal arm entire, without articulations or independently movable parts; and four apical setae on the distal lobe, probably with the most apical and basal ones directed mediad and the two medial ones directed more-or-less laterad. In addition, each paramere was articulated with a separate condyle of the median lobe of the aedeagus near the middle of the condylite of the paramere, and the apices of the dorsobasal lobes of the two parameres articulated with each other substantially distal to the articulation with the median lobe of the aedeagus. The most parsimonious resolution of paramere evolution suggests that aleocharine parameres were derived from structures similar to those found in Trichophyinae, Phloeocharinae, and Olisthaerinae and that they are not de novo structures. Hypotheses about homologous regions between aleocharine parameres and those of these latter three groups are suggested.

Résumé

La structure des paramères (lobes latéraux) de l’édéage a été examinée en détail chez les Aleocharinae, plus particulièrement chez les lignées les plus anciennes, dans le but d’établir les bases d’une phylogénie hypothétique des lignées anciennes chez les sous-familles Aleocharinae et Tachyporinae. Les paramères de l’ancêtre de tous les aléocharinés actuels avaient les caractéristiques suivantes : lobes dorsobasal et ventrobasal plus semblables par leur taille que ceux des aléocharinés actuels plus évolués, lobe dorsobasal (condylite) non articulé, en continuité avec le lobe distal, vélum strié partant des abords de la base du lobe dorsobasal et atteignant presque l’apex du lobe distal et issu de la surface dorsale du lobe distal, bras distal entier, sans articulations ou appendices indépendants articulés, enfin quatre soies apicales sur le lobe distal, la plus apicale et la plus basale probablement orientées vers le milieu et les deux médianes plus ou moins vers les côtés. En outre, chaque paramère s’articulait sur un condyle séparé du lobe médian de l’édéage, près du milieu du condylite du paramère, et les extrémités des lobes dorsauxbasaux des deux paramères s’articulaient l’un sur l’autre bien au-delà de l’articulation du lobe médian sur l’édéage. L’hypothèse la plus parcimonieuse de l’évolution des paramères indique que les paramères des Aleocharinae dérivent de structures semblables à celles qui prévalent chez les Trichophyinae, les Phloeocharinae et les Olisthaerinae et ne sont pas des structures de novo. Des hypothèses sur l’homologie de certaines régions des paramères chez les aléocharinés et chez les autres groupes sont proposées.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 126 , Issue 3 , June 1994 , pp. 475 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashe, J.S., and F.Newton, A.. 1993. Larvae of Trichophya and phylogeny of the tachyporine group of subfamilies (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) with a review, new species and characterization of the Trichophyinae. Systematic Entomology 18: 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwelder, R.E. 1936. Morphology of the coleopterous family Staphylinidae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Publications 94(13): 1–102.Google Scholar
Brooks, D.R., and A.McLennan, D.. 1991. Phylogeny, Ecology, and Behavior: A Research Program in Comparative Biology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. xii + 434 pp.Google Scholar
Brundin, L. 1942. Monographie der palaearktischen Arten der Atheta-Untergattung Hygroecia (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Annalen des naturhistorischen Museums in Wien 53(2): 129–300.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1973 a. A revision of the genus Tachinomorphus (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) of North and Central America. The Canadian Entomologist 105: 1015–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1973 b. A Revision of the Genus Tachinus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of North and Central America. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 90: 137 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1975. A revision of the genera Coproporus and Cilea (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of America north of Mexico. The Canadian Entomologist 107: 175–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1976. A Revision of the Genus Sepedophilus Gistel (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of America North of Mexico. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 99: 89 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1979. A Revision of the Genus Tachyporus Gravenhorst (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of North and Central America. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 109: 95 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1980. A revision of the genus Carphacis des Gozis (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) of North America. The Canadian Entomologist 112: 935–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.M. 1982. A Revision of the Genus Lordithon Thomson of North and Central America (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 119: 116 pp.Google Scholar
Hammond, P. 1975. The phylogeny of a remarkable new genus and species of gymnusine staphylinid (Coleoptera) from the Auckland Islands. Journal of Entomology (B) 44(2): 153–173.Google Scholar
Hoebeke, E.R. 1985. A revision of the rove beetle tribe Falagriini of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae). Journal of the New York Entomological Society 93(2): 913–1018.Google Scholar
Klimaszewski, J. 1979. A Revision of the Gymnusini and Deinopsini of the World. Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae. Canadian Agricultural Monograph 25: 169 pp.Google Scholar
Klimaszewski, J. 1980. Two new species of Deinopsini from the Afrotropical and Nearctic regions, with notes on two other species of this tribe (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne 50: 109–120.Google Scholar
Klimaszewski, J. 1982. A revision of the Gymnusini and Deinopsini of the world (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Supplementum 2. The Canadian Entomologist 114: 317–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimaszewski, J. 1985. A revision of the Gymnusini and Deinopsini fo the world (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae) Supplement 3. The Coleopterists Bulletin 39(1): 60–66.Google Scholar
Lawrence, J.F., and F.Newton, A. Jr., 1982. Evolution and classification of beetles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13: 261–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peschke, K. 1978. Funktionsmorphologische Untersuchungen zur Kopulation von Aleochara curtula Goeze (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae). Zoomorphologie 89: 157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawada, K. 1972. Methodological research in the taxonomy of Aleocharinae. Contributions of the Biological Laboratory of Kyoto University 24(1): 31–59.Google Scholar
Seevers, C.H. 1978. A generic and tribal revision of North American Aleocharinae (Staphylinidae). Fileldiana: Zoology 71: 1–279.Google Scholar
Sharp, D., and Muir, F.. 1912. The comparative anatomy of the male genital tube in Coleoptera. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 1912, part III: 477–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, L. 1911. Beitrag zum Bau der Copulationsorgane der männlichen Staphyliniden. Festschrift Verein Naturkunde Cassel 1836–1911: 284–313.Google Scholar