Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:31:18.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVIDENCE FOR MATE CHOICE BY MALE BAGWORMS, OIKETICUS KIRBYI (GUILDING) (LEPIDOPTERA: PSYCHIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Marc Rhainds ,
Gerhard Gries  and
Rolbin Rodriguez
Marc Rhainds
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Gerhard Gries*
Affiliation:
Centre for Pest Management, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6
Rolbin Rodriguez
Affiliation:
Palma Tica / ASD de Costa Rica, Apdo 30-1000, San José, Costa Rica
*
1 Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In field and cage experiments in a Costa Rican oil palm plantation, the largest, most fecund female bagworms, Oiketicus kirbyi, had the greatest mating success. Differential mating success of small and large females may be attributed to mate choice by males or to competition between protogynous females for access to males.

Résumé

Des expériences au champ et en cage dans des plantations de palmier à huile au Costa Rica ont indiqué que le succès d’accouplement et la fécondité des femelles du psychide Oiketicus kirbyi augmentent avec la taille des femelles. Le plus grand succès d’accouplement des grosses femelles est attribuable soit à un comportement d’accouplement sélectif de la part des mâles, soit à une compétition entre les femelles protogynes pour attirer les mâles.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 127 , Issue 6 , December 1995 , pp. 799 - 803
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boggs, C.L., and Gilbert, L.E.. 1979. Male contribution to egg production in butterflies: Evidence for transfer of nutrients at mating. Science 206: 83–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campos Arce, J., Peres, O., and Berti, E.. 1987. Biologia do bicho co cesto Oiketicus kirbyi (Lands.-Guilding, 1827) (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) em folhas de eucalyptus spp. Anais de Escuela Superiore Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz 44: 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewsbury, D.A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. American Naturalist 119: 601–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgar, M.A., and Pierce, N.E.. 1988. Mating success and fecundity in an ant-tended Lycaenid butterfly. pp. 59–75 in Clutton-Brock, T.H. (Ed.), Reproductive Success. Studies of Individual Variations in Contrasting Breeding Systems. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL. 538 pp.Google Scholar
Gwynne, D.T. 1981. Sexual selection theory: Mormon crickets show role reversal in mate choice. Science 213: 779–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gwynne, D.T., and Simmons, L.W.. 1990. Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature 346: 172–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, C.W. 1988. The Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis). Longman Scientific & Technical, New York, NY. 761 pp.Google Scholar
Hieber, C.S., and Cohen, J.A.. 1983. Sexual selection in the lovebug, Plecia neartica: The role of mate choice. Evolution 37: 987–992.Google Scholar
Marshall, L. 1982. Male courtship persistence in Colias philodice and C. eurytheme (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 55: 729–736.Google Scholar
Phelan, P.L., and Baker, T.C.. 1986. Male size related courtship success and intersexual selection in the tobacco moth, Ephestia elutella. Experientia 42: 1291–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhainds, M., Gries, G., and Chinchilla, C.M.. 1995. Pupation site and emergence time influence the mating success of bagworm females, Oiketicus kirbyi (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. In press.Google Scholar
Rhainds, M., Gries, G., Li, J., Gries, R., Slessor, K.N., Chinchilla, C.M., and Oehlschlager, A.C.. 1994. Chiral esters: Sex pheromone of the bagworm, Oiketicus kirbyi (Lepidoptera: Psychidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology 20: 3083–3096.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutowski, R.L. 1982. Epigamic selection by males as evidenced by courtship partner preferences in the checkered white butterfly (Pieris protodice). Animal Behaviour 30: 108–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutowski, R.L., Newton, M., and Schaefer, J.. 1983. Interspecific variation in the size of the nutrient investment made by male butterflies during copulation. Evolution 37: 708–713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelly, T.E., and Bailey, W.J.. 1992. Experimental manipulation of mate choice by male katydids: The effect of female encounter rate. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 30: 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, S.R. 1979. Aspects of mating frequency and reproductive maturity in Papilio zelicaon. American Midland Naturalist 102: 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, C.S. 1962. Oiketicus kirbyi (Lepidoptera: Psychidae), a pest of bananas in Costa Rica. Journal of Economic Entomology 55: 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Y. 1978. Adult longevity and reproductive potential of the small cabbage white, Pieris rapae crucivora Boisduval (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Applied Entomology and Zoology 13: 312–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J.. 1983. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 547 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar