Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:42:42.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence for (E)-pityol as an aggregation pheromone of Pityophthorus pubescens (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2012

Sergio López ,
Carmen Quero ,
Juan Carlos Iturrondobeitia ,
Ángel Guerrero  and
Arturo Goldarazena
Sergio López
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production and Protection, Neiker-Tecnalia (Basque Institute of Agricultural Research and Development), Arkaute, 46. E-01080 Vitoria, Spain
Carmen Quero
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Modelling, Institut de Quimica Avançada de Catalunya, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Jordi Girona 18-26. E-08034, Barcelona, Spain
Juan Carlos Iturrondobeitia
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology, University of the Basque Country, Sarriena s/n. E-48940, Leioa, Spain
Ángel Guerrero
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Modelling, Institut de Quimica Avançada de Catalunya, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Jordi Girona 18-26. E-08034, Barcelona, Spain
Arturo Goldarazena*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Production and Protection, Neiker-Tecnalia (Basque Institute of Agricultural Research and Development), Arkaute, 46. E-01080 Vitoria, Spain
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present evidence favoring the use of (E)-pityol as an aggregation pheromone in Pityophthorus pubescens (Marsham). (E)-Pityol was detected in effluvia of male and female P. pubescens, and antennae of both sexes responded to (E)-(+)-pityol in electroantennogram assays. In two-choice olfactometer tests, males significantly preferred (E)-(+)-pityol and (E)-(±)-pityol to blank controls at doses of 1, 10, and 100ng, whereas females only showed a preference for (E)-pityol at the 1ng dose.

Résumé

Dans ce travail, nous présentons la preuve de l'utilisation de (E)-pityol comme une phéromone d'agrégation par Pityophthorus pubescens (Marsham). (E)-Pityol a été détecté dans les volatiles des mâles et des femelles de P. pubescens et les antennes des deux sexes ont répondu au (E)-(+)-pityol lors des essais électrophysiologiques. Dans un olfactomètre à deux choix, les mâles ont montré une préférence significative pour (E)-(+)- pityol et (E)-(±)-pityol aux doses de 1, 10, et 100ng par rapport au contrôle, alors que les femelles seulement ont montré une préférence pour (E)-pityol à la dose de 1ng.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 143 , Issue 5 , September 2011 , pp. 447 - 454
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belardi, R.P. Pawliszyn, J.B. 1989. The application of chemically modified fused silica fibers in the extraction of organics from water matrix samples and their rapid transfer to capillary columns. Water Pollution Research Journal of Canada, 24: 179–191.Google Scholar
Birch, M.C. Light, D.M. Wood, D.L. Browne, L.E. Silverstein, R.M. Bergot, B.J. 1980. Pheromonal attraction and allomonal interruption of Ips pini in California by the two enantiomers of ipsdienol. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 6: 703–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birgersson, G. DeBarr, G.L. de Groot, P. Dalusky, M.J. PierceH.D., Jr. H.D., Jr. Borden, J.H., et al.  1995. Pheromones in white pine cone beetle, Conophthorus coniperda (Schwarz) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21: 143–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, D.E. 1981. Taxonomic monograph of the genus Pityophthorus Eichhoff in North and Central America (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada No. 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chararas, C. 1966. Recherches sur l'attractivité chez les Scolytidae: étude sur l'attractivité sexuelle chez Carphoborus minimus Fabr. Coléoptère Scolytidae typiquement polygame. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l' Academie. des Sciences Serie D Paris, 262: 2492–2495.Google Scholar
Chararas, C. 1975. Spécifité de la réponse des Scolytidae monogames et polygames a l'attraction exercée par les résidus de la digestión (déjections). Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l' Academie. des Sciences Serie D Paris, 280: 2567–2570.Google Scholar
Cognato, A.I. Gillette, N.E. Bolaños, R.C. Sperling, F.A.H. 2005. Mitochondrial phylogeny of pine cone beetles (Scolytinae, Conophthorus) and their affiliation with geographic area and host. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 36: 494–508.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dallara, P.L. Seybold, S.J. Meyer, H. Tolasch, T. Francke, W. Wood, D.L. 2000. Semiochemicals from three species of Pityophthorus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): identification and field response. The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 889–906.Google Scholar
de Groot, P. DeBarr, G.L. 2000. Response of cone and twig beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and a predator (Coleoptera: Cleridae) to pityol, conophthorin, and verbenone. The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 843–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francke, W. Pan, M.L. König, W.A. Mori, K. Puapoomchareon, P. Heuer, H. Vité, J.P. 1987. Identification of ‘pityol’ and ‘grandisol’ as pheromone components of the bark beetle, Pityophthorus pityographus. Naturwissenschaften, 74: 343–345.Google Scholar
Kirkendall, L.R. 1983. The evolution of mating systems in bark and ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae and Platypodidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 77: 293–352.Google Scholar
Kohnle, U. Densborn, S. Kölsch, P. Meyer, H. Francke, W. 1992. E-7-Methyl-1,6-dioxaspiro[4.5]decane in the chemical communication of European Scolytidae and Nitidulidae (Coleoptera). Journal of Applied Entomology, 114: 187–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, E.S. Moreira, J.A. Millar, J.G. Ray, A.M. Hanks, L.M. 2004. Male-produced aggregation pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Neoclytus mucronatus mucronatus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 30: 1493–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leal, W.S. 1996. Chemical communication in scarab beetles: reciprocal behavioral agonist-antagonist activities of chiral pheromones. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93: 12112–12115.Google Scholar
López, S. Romón, P. Iturrondobeitia, J.C. Goldarazena, A. 2007. Conifer bark beetles of Basque Country: practical guide for identification and control. Basque Government Publication Service, Vitoria, The Basque Country, Spain. [In Spanish.].Google Scholar
Matich, A.J. Rowan, D.D. Banks, N.H. 1996. Solid phase microextraction for quantitative headspace sampling of apple volatiles. Analytical Chemistry, 68: 4114–4118.Google Scholar
Miller, D.R. PierceH.D., Jr. H.D., Jr. de Groot, P. Jean-Williams, N. Bennett, R. Borden, J.H. 2000. Sex pheromone of Conophthorus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in a coastal stand of western white pine (Pinaceae). The Canadian Entomologist, 132: 243–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mori, K. 2007. Significance of chirality in pheromone science. Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry, 15: 7505–7523.Google Scholar
Mori, K. Puapoomchareon, P. 1987. Conversion of the enantiomers of sulcatol (5-methyl-5-hepten-2-ol) to the enantiomers of pityol (trans-2-(1-hydroxy-1-methylethyl)-5-methyltetrahydrofuran), a male specific attractant of the bark beetle Pityophthorus pityographus. Liebigs Annalen der Chemie, 3: 271–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, A. 1976. Revision der paläarktischen Arten der Gattung Pityophthorus Eichhoff (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Acta Entomologica Bohemoslovaca, 73: 324–342.Google Scholar
Pierce, H.D. de Groot, P. Borden, J.H. Ramaswamy, S. Oehlschlager, A.C. 1995. Pheromones in red pine cone beetle, Conophthorus resinosae Hopkins, and its synonym, C. banksianae McPherson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 21: 169–185.Google Scholar
Romón, P. Iturrondobeitia, J.C. Gibson, K. Lindgren, B.S. Goldarazena, A. 2007. Quantitative association of bark beetles with pitch canker fungus and effect of verbenone on their semiochemical communication in Monterey pine forests in northern Spain. Environmental Entomology, 36: 743–750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakamoto, J.M. Gordon, T.R. Storer, A.J. Wood, D.L. 2007. The role of Pityophthorus spp. as vectors of pitch canker affecting Monterey pines (Pinus radiata). The Canadian Entomologist, 139: 864–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storer, A.J. Wood, D.L. Gordon, T.R. 2004. Twig beetles, Pityophthorus spp. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), as vectors of the pitch canker pathogen in California. The Canadian Entomologist, 136: 685–693.Google Scholar
Vité, J.P. 1965. Die Wirkung pflanzen- und insekteneigener Lockstoffe auf Pityophthorus and Pityogenes (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Naturwissenschaften, 52: 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S.L. 1982. The bark and ambrosia beetles of North and Central America, a taxonomic monograph. Great Basin Naturalist Memoirs, 6: 1–1359 .Google Scholar