Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:28:17.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EVALUATION OF CROSS-ATTRACTION BETWEEN SYMPATRIC CHORISTONEURA OCCIDENTALIS AND C. RETINIANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) POPULATIONS IN SOUTH-CENTRAL OREGON

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Andrew M. Liebhold ,
W. Jan A. Volney  and
William E. Waters
Andrew M. Liebhold
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley 94720
W. Jan A. Volney
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley 94720
William E. Waters
Affiliation:
Division of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pheromone specificity of female Choristoneura occcidentalis Freeman and C. retiniana (Walsingham) from several locales, laboratory colonies, and interspecific matings was determined by observing the numbers and wing maculations of males attracted at several sites in southern Oregon. Pheromone specificity of females reared from field-collected brown (typical of C. occidentalis) and green (typical of C. retiniana) larval morphs differed considerably but differed little among sites of origin. Field-collected females attracted more males than conspecific individuals from laboratory colonies. F1 and F2 interspecific hybrids most closely resembled C. occidentalis in the numbers and types of males attracted. As a group, progeny of backcrosses to C. retiniana appeared intermediate between pure lines of the species in their pheromone specificity. Females reared from intermediate-colored field-collected larvae varied considerably in attractiveness. Most attracted groups of males similar to those attracted to female C. retiniana, but others attracted males most similar to those attracted to female progeny of C. retiniana hybrid backcrosses. These findings support the conclusion that hybrid matings occur between these species at a low frequency in nature.

Résumé

La spécificité de la phéromone chez des femelles de Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman et de C. retiniana (Walsingham) provenant de plusieurs sites, de colonies de laboratoire et de croisements interspécifiques a été étudiée en déterminant les nombres et les taches alaires des mâles attirés à plusieurs endroits en Oregon. La spécificité de la phéromone diffère considérablement entre des femelles provenant de larves brunes (couleur typique chez C. occidentalis) et vertes (C. retiniana) prélevées sur le terrain, mais très peu entre les sites d'origine. Les femelles prélevées sur le terrain ont attiré plus de mâles que des conspécifiques provenant de colonies de laboratoire. Des hybrides interspécifique de F1 et F2 ressemblaient plus à C. occidentalis quant aux nombres et aux types de mâles attirés. En tant que groupe, la progéniture des rétrocroisements avec C. retiniana est apparue intermédiaire entre les lignées pures quant à sa spécificité. Des femelles élevées à partir de larves de couleur intermédiaire provenant du terrain ont montré une variabilité considérable. La plupart ont attiré des groupes de mâles similaires à ceux attirés par les femelles de C. retiniana, mais certaines ont attiré des mâles ressemblant plus à ceux attirés aux femelles provenant des rétro-croisements d'hybrides avec C. retiniana. Ces observations appuient la conclusion voulant que des croisements entre ces deux espèces se produisent avec une fréquence réduite en nature.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 116 , Issue 6 , June 1984 , pp. 827 - 840
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cory, H. T., Daterman, G. E., Daves, G. D. Jr., Sower, L. L., Shepherd, R. F., and Sanders, C. J.. 1982. Chemistry and field evaluation of the sex pheromone of the western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman. J. Chem. Ecol. 8: 339–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F. and Kimura, M.. 1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. Harper & Row, N.Y.591 pp.Google Scholar
Daterman, G. E., Cory, H. T., Sower, L. L., and Daves, G. D. Jr.Sex pheromone of a conifer-feeding budworm, Choristoneura retiniana Walsingham. J. Chem. Ecol. (in press).Google Scholar
Dolph, R. E. Jr. 1980. Budworm activity in Oregon and Washington 1947–1979. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Pacif. Northwest Reg. R6-FIDM-033. 54 pp.Google Scholar
Freeman, T. N. 1953. The spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) and an allied new species on pine (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 85: 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, T. N. 1967. On coniferophagous species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in North America. I. Some new forms of Choristoneura allied to C. fumiferana. Can. Ent. 99: 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grizzle, J. E., Starmer, C. F., and Koch, G. G.. 1969. Analysis of categorical data by linear models. Biometrics 25: 489–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hand, D. J. 1981. Discrimination and Classification. Wiley, N.Y.218 pp.Google Scholar
Harvey, G. T. and Stehr, G.. 1967. On coniferophagous species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in North America. III. Some characters of immature forms helpful in the identification of species. Can. Ent. 99: 464–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, E. L. 1975. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. Holden-Day, San Francisco. 457 pp.Google Scholar
Liebhold, A. M. and Volney, W. J. A.. 1984 a. Effect of temporal factors on reproductive isolation between Choristoneura occidentalis and C. retiniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. (in press).Google Scholar
Liebhold, A. M. and Volney, W. J. A.. 1984 b. Effect of foliage proximity on attraction of Choristoneura occidentalis and C. retiniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) to pheromone sources. J. Chem. Ecol. (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R. G. 1966. Simultaneous Statistical Inference. McGraw-Hill, N.Y.272 pp.Google Scholar
Powell, J. A. 1964. Biological and taxonomic studies on tortricine moths, with reference to the species in California. Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 32. 317 pp.Google Scholar
Powell, J. A. 1980. Nomenclature of Nearctic conifer-feeding Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Historical review and present status. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-100. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Richerson, J. V. and Cameron, E. A.. 1974. Differences in pheromone release and sexual behavior between laboratory-reared and wild gypsy moth adults. Environ. Ent. 3: 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. L. 1979. Rearing the western spruce budworm. USDA Misc. Publ. Canada/United States Spruce Budworms Program. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1971 a. Daily activity patterns and sex pheromone specificity as sexual isolating mechanisms in two species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1971 b. Sex pheromone specificity and taxonomy of budworm moths (Choristoneura). Science 171: 911–913.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, C. J., Daterman, G. E., and Ennis, T. J.. 1977. Sex pheromone responses of Choristoneura spp. and their hybrids (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 109: 1203–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silk, P. J., Wiesner, C. J., Tan, S. H., Ross, R. J., and Grant, G. G.. 1982. Sex pheromone chemistry of the western spruce budworm Choristoneura occidentalis Free. J. Chem. Ecol. 8: 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1953. Reproductive isolation and the integrity of two sympatric species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 85: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1954. A partial breakdown of temporal and ecological isolation between Choristoneura species (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Evolution 8: 206–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J.. 1981. Biometry. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco. 859 pp.Google Scholar
Tukey, J. M. 1962. The future of data analysis. Ann. Math. Statist. 33: 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volney, W. J. A., Liebhold, A. M., and Waters, W. E.. 1983. Effects of temperature, sex, and genetic background on coloration of Choristoneura spp. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations in south-central Oregon. Can. Ent. 115: 1583–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volney, W. J. A., Liebhold, A. M., and Waters, W. E.. 1984. Host associations, phenotypic variation, and mating compatibility of Choristoneura occidentalis and C. retiniana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) populations in south-central Oregon. Can. Ent. 116: 813–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar