Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:50:16.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The European fire ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as an invasive species: impact on local ant species and other epigaeic arthropods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2014

Ken Naumann  and
Rob J. Higgins
Ken Naumann*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Langara College, 100W. 49 Ave., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V5Y 2Z6
Rob J. Higgins
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, 900 McGill Road, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada V2C 0C8
*
1 Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Pitfall trapping revealed that the European fire ant, Myrmica rubra (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), represents an unusual example of a temperate invasive ant species. In British Columbia, Canada, M. rubra populations are associated with a decreased incidence and abundance of other ant species in three different plant communities when compared with M. rubra-free control areas. M. rubra represented more than 99.99% of the total ant fauna caught in the infested areas, and the numbers of M. rubra captured in the plant communities ranged from over 10 times to over 1300 times the total number of all ants collected in corresponding M. rubra-free areas. Total numbers of some taxa of insects and non-insect arthropods, including those likely to be competitors or prey of M. rubra, were reduced where the invasive species was present. Biodiversity indexes for the overall suite of captured arthropod species were lower where M. rubra was present in all three plant communities but most of this decrease can be attributed to the difference in the ant fauna.

Résumé

La capture de fourmis à l’aide de piège-fosses a révélé que les fourmis rouges, Myrmica rubra (Linnaeus) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), représentent un exemple inhabituel d’espèce invasive en zone tempérée. En Colombie-Britannique, Canada, elles sont associées à un déclin en incidence et en abondance d’autres espèces de fourmis dans trois phytocénoses differentes comparativement aux aires de contrôle sans fourmis M. rubra. Myrmica rubra représentait plus de 99.99% de la totalité des fourmis attrapées dans les régions infestées, et le nombre de M. rubra attrapées dans les phytocénoses variait entre plus de 10 fois et plus de 1300 fois le nombre total de toutes les fourmis attrapées dans les aires de contrôle sans M. rubra. Les nombre totaux de certains taxons d’insectes et autres arthropodes, incluant des compétiteurs ou proies probables de M. rubra, étaient réduits dans les endroits où l’espèce invasive était présente. Les indices de biodiversité pour la collection complète des espèces d’arthropodes capturés étaient plus bas dans les endroits où M. rubra était présente dans les trois phytocénoses; cependant, la majorité de ce déclin peut être attribué à la diversité de la faune de fourmis.

Type
Behaviour & Ecology
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 147 , Issue 5 , October 2015 , pp. 592 - 601
Copyright
© Entomological Society of Canada 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Subject editor: Keith Summerville

References

Collingwood, C.A. 1979. The Formicidae (Hymenoptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark. Fauna Entomologica Scandinavica, 8: 1–174.Google Scholar
Colwell, R.K. 2013. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User’s guide and application [online]. Available from purl.oclc.org/estimates [accessed 20 May 2013].Google Scholar
Erickson, J.M. 1971. The displacement of native ant species by the introduced Argentine ant Iridomyrmex humilis Mayr. Psyche, 78: 257–266.Google Scholar
Fisher, B.L. and Cover, S.P. 2007. Ants of North America. A guide to the genera. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, United States of America.Google Scholar
Fokhul, G., Heinze, J., and Poschlod, P. 2007. Colony growth in Myrmica rubra with supplementation of myrmecochorous seeds. Ecological Research, 22: 845–847.Google Scholar
Garnas, J.R., Drummond, F.A., and Groden, E. 2007. Intercolony aggression within and among local populations of the invasive ant, Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in coastal Maine. Environmental Entomology, 36: 105–113.Google Scholar
Groden, E., Drummond, F.A., Garnas, J., and Francoeur, A. 2005. Distribution of an invasive ant, Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Maine. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98: 1774–1784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hicks, B.A. 2012. How does Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) disperse in its invasive range? Record of male-only mating flights from Newfoundland. Myrmecological News, 16: 31–34.Google Scholar
Higgins, R. 2013. European fire ant (Myrmica rubra) project: confirming current distribution in BC and development of effective control methods – final report. Prepared for the British Columbia Inter-Ministry Invasive Species Working Group, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Higgins, R.J. and Lindgren, B.S. 2012. An evaluation of methods for sampling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in British Columbia, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 144: 491–507.Google Scholar
Holway, D.A. 1998. Effect of Argentine ant invasions on ground-dwelling arthropods in northern California riparian woodlands. Oecologia, 116: 252–258.Google Scholar
Holway, D.A., Lach, L., Suarex, A.V., Tsusui, N.D., and Case, T.J. 2002. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33: 181–233.Google Scholar
Human, K.G. and Gordon, D.M. 1997. Effects of Argentine ants on invertebrate biodiversity in Northern California. Conservation Biology, 11: 1242–1248.Google Scholar
Jansen, G. and Radchenko, A. 2009. Myrmica specioides Bondroit: a new invasive ant species in the USA? Biological Invasions, 11: 253–256.Google Scholar
Longino, J.T. 2000. What to do with the data? In Ants. Standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Edited by M.D. Agosti, D. Majer, L.E. Alonso, and T.R. Schultz. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America. Pp. 186–203.Google Scholar
McGlynn, T.P. 1999. The worldwide transfer of ants: geographical distribution and ecological invasions. Journal of Biogeography, 26: 535–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naumann, K., Preston, W.B., and Ayre, G.L. 1999. An annotated checklist of the ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 96: 29–69.Google Scholar
Porter, S.D. and Savignano, D.A. 1990. Invasion of fire ants decimates native ants and disrupts arthropod community. Ecology, 71: 2095–2106.Google Scholar
Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 42: 223–225.Google Scholar
Robinson, D.C.E., Knowler, D., Kyobe, D., and de la Cueva Bueno, P. 2013. Preliminary damage estimates for selected invasive fauna in B.C. Ecosystems Branch, British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.Google Scholar
Schlick-Steiner, B.C., Steiner, F.M., Moder, K., Seifert, B., Sanetra, M., Dyreson, E., et al. 2006. A multidisciplinary approach reveals cryptic diversity in western Palearctic Tetramorium ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 40: 259–273.Google Scholar
Wetterer, J.K. and Radchenko, A.G. 2011. Wordwide spread of the ruby ant, Myrmica rubra (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 14: 87–96.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1955. A monographic revision of the genus Lasius . Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 113: 1–199.Google Scholar
Wittman, S.E. 2014. Impacts of invasive ants on native ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 19: 111–123.Google Scholar