Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:59:36.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ESTIMATING MITE POPULATIONS IN SOUTHERN OREGON PEAR ORCHARDS1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. H. Westigard
Affiliation:
Oregon State University
L. D. Calvin
Affiliation:
Oregon State University

Abstract

Studies were conducted in southern Oregon pear orchards to develop sampling methods for assessment of mite abundance. Those species included in the investigation were the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch; European red mite, Panonychus ulmi (Koch); yellow spider mite, Eotetranychus carpini borealis (Ewing); and the predaceous phytoseiid Typhlodromus occidentalis Nesbitt.The results show that five leaves on one limb per tree are adequate to include representative numbers of the four mite species. Variation in mite densities between trees, even of the same variety, was quite high. The sample size (numbers of trees) required for assessing mite density can be calculated provided that an estimate of the coefficient of variation (S/X) is available.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chant, D. A. 1959. Phytoseiid mites (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). 1: Bionomics of seven species in southeastern England. Can. Ent. Suppl. 12, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Hoyt, S. C., Retan, A. H., Rushmore, F. A., and Hudson, W. B.. 1968. Integrated control of insect and mite pests. Wash. St. Ext. Mineo. 2788, 9 pp.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1946. Statistical methods, 4th ed., 485 pp. Iowa State College Press, Ames.Google ScholarPubMed
Westigard, P. H., Lombard, P., and Berry, D.. 1967. Bionomics and control of the twospotted spider mite on pear in southern Oregon. Ore. St. Univ. Tech. Bull. 101, 32 pp.Google Scholar