Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T11:40:29.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ESTIMATED EGG DEPOSITION BY INVADING SPRUCE BUDWORM MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. A. Miller
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5P7
D. O. Greenbank
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5P7
E. G. Kettela
Affiliation:
Canadian Forestry Service, Maritimes Forest Research Centre, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5P7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A 4000-ha block of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), infested forest in western New Brunswick was sprayed repeatedly in 1975 during the larval stage of budworm development. The objective was to reduce the population of the 1975 generation to a minimum level so that most of the following generation eggs found on the block could be attributed to invading females, thus providing data on the impact of moth invasion.

The presence of dispersing adults in the airspace over the block was monitored by a ground-based radar unit while light traps and pheromone-baited traps were used to confirm that invasion had taken place. A total egg population of 33.8 masses per m2 of foliage was found on the block and indirect estimates suggest that invading females deposited about 10 of these masses.

Résumé

Un bloc de 4 000 ha de forêt infestée par la Tordeuse des bourgeons de l’Epinette, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) au Nouveau-Brunswick a été arrosé à maintes reprises en 1975 durant le stade larvaire de la Tordeuse. L’objectif visé était de réduire au minimum la population de la génération de 1975, afin que la plupart des oeufs de la génération suivante puissent être attribués aux femelles envahissantes, fournissant ainsi des données sur l’influence de l’invasion des papillons.

La présence des adultes se dispersant dans l’espace aérien au-dessus du bloc a été suivie de près par une unité radar pendant que des pièges lumineux et à phérormones étaient utilisés pour confirmer l’invasion. Une population totale d’oeufs à raison de 33.8 masses par m2 de feuillage fut relevée dans ce bloc et des évaluations indirectes ont supposé que les femelles envahissantes avaient pondu environ 10 de ces masses.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1978

References

Greenbank, D. O. 1957. The role of climate and dispersal in the initiation of outbreaks of the spruce budworm in New Brunswick. II. The role of dispersal. Can. J. Zool. 35: 385403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1963. The analysis of moth survival and dispersal on the unsprayed area, pp. 8798. In The dynamics of epidemic spruce budworm populations. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 31.Google Scholar
Greenbank, D. O. 1973. The dispersal process of spruce budworm moths. Marit. For. Res. Cent., Inf. Rep. M-X-39. 25 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, C. A., Stewart, J. F., Elgee, D. E., Shaw, D. D., Morgan, M. G., Kettela, E. G., Greenbank, D. O., and Gesner, G. N.. 1973. Aerial spraying against spruce budworm adults in New Brunswick. Marit. For. Res. Cent. Inf. Rep. M-X-38. 35 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1955. The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliators with particular reference to the spruce budworm. Can. J. Zool. 33: 225294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaefer, G. W. 1976. Radar observations of insect flight, pp. 157197. In Rainey, R. C. (Ed), Insect flight. Symp. Roy. ent. Soc. Land. No. 7. Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Weatherston, J., Roelofs, W., Comeau, A., and Sanders, C. J.. 1971. Studies of physiological active arthropod secretions. X. Sex pheromone of the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana Clem. (Lepidoptera:Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 103: 17411747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar