Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:53:09.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ELECTROPHORETIC PATTERNS OF EGG PROTEINS FROM SEVERAL INSECT TAXA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

E. H. Salkeld
E. H. Salkeld
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Egg-protein patterns from 23 insect species representing seven orders were obtained by acrylamide gel electrophoresis. The patterns were species specific and highly reproducible. Those for congeneric species were very similar and family resemblances were apparent. The usefulness of egg-protein patterns in phylogenetic studies and in the analysis of closely related species was suggested.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 101 , Issue 12 , December 1969 , pp. 1256 - 1265
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodnaryk, R. P., and Morrison, P. E.. 1966. The relationship between nutrition, haemolymph proteins, and ovarian development in Musca domestica L. J. Insect Physiol. 12: 963–976.Google Scholar
Bracken, G. K. 1969. Effects of dietary amino acids, salts and protein starvation on fecundity of the parasitoid Exeristes comstocki (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 101: 91–96.Google Scholar
Brown, W. J. 1945. Food-plants and distribution of the species of Calligrapha in Canada, with descriptions of new species (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 77: 117–133.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. T. 1964. Simplified disc (polyacrylamide gel) electrophoresis. Ann. N.Y. Acad. sci. 121: 428–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dejmal, R. K., and Brookes, V. J.. 1968. Solubility and electrophoretic properties of ovarial protein of the cockroach Leucophaea maderae. J. Insect Physiol. 14: 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, A. 1966. Proteins in the haemolymph and other tissues of the developing tomato hornworm Protoparce quinquemaculata Haworth. Can. J. Zool. 44: 541–555.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koch, P. 1968. Protein composition and changing protein patterns of developing insect eggs. Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (C) 33: 13–14, and 19–20.Google Scholar
Laufer, H. 1964. Macromolecular patterns in development and evolution, pp. 171–189. In Leone, Charles A. (ed.), Taxonomic biochemistry and serology. Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
Loughton, B. G., and West, A. S.. 1965. The development and distribution of haemolymph proteins in Lepidoptera. J. Insect Physiol. 11: 919–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marty, R., et Zolta, J. P.. 1968. Significations possibles des variations protéiniques de l'hémolymphe des orthoptères, analysée par l'électrophorèse en gel de polyacrylamide. J. Insect Physiol. 14: 861–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J. G. 1966. The chromosomes of bisexual and parthenogenetic species of Calligrapha (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) with notes on sex ratio, abundance and egg number. Can. J. Gen. Cytol. 8: 695–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salkeld, E. H. 1965. Electrophoretic separation and identification of esterases in eggs and young nymphs of the large milkweed bug, Oncopeltus fasciatus (Dallas). Can. J. Zool. 43: 593–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Sande, M., and Karcher, D.. 1960. Species differentiation of insects by haemolymph electrophoresis. Science 131: 1103–1104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxena, K. N., Seshachar, B. R., and Gandhi, J. R.. 1965. Taxonomic value of biochemical characteristics of animals with reference to amino acids. Syst. Zool. 14: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sibley, C. G. 1960. The electrophoretic patterns of avian egg-white proteins as taxonomic characters. Ibis 102: 215–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sibley, C. G. 1962. The comparative morphology of protein molecules as data for classification. Syst. Zool. 11: 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephen, W. P. 1958. Hemolymph proteins and their use in taxonomic studies. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent., Vol. 1, pp. 395–400.Google Scholar
Stephen, W. P. 1961. Phylogenetic significance of blood proteins among some orthopteroid insects. Syst. Zool. 10: 1–9.Google Scholar
Telfer, W. H., and Rutberg, L. D.. 1960. The effects of blood protein depletion on the growth of the oocytes in the cecropia moth. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 118: 352–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Throckmorton, L. H. 1968. Biochemistry and taxonomy. A. Rev. Ent. 13: 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuyuki, H., and Roberts, E.. 1966. Inter-species relationships within the genus Oncorhynchus based on biochemical systematics. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 23: 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, J. G., Waite, A., Boulter, D., and Waiters, S.. 1966. Comparative studies of the seed proteins of Brassica campestris, Brassica oleracea, and Brassica nigra. J. exp. Bot. 17: 332–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voris, H. K. 1967. Electrophoretic patterns of plasmaproteins in the viperine snakes. Physiol. Zool. 40: 238–247.Google Scholar
Wellington, W. G. 1965. Some maternal influences on progeny quality in the western tent caterpillar, Malacosoma pluviale (Dyar). Can. Ent. 97: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, C. A., and Ross, G. C.. 1965. Electrophoretic studies of some planorbid egg proteins. Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 32: 709–712.Google ScholarPubMed