Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:33:43.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EGG PARASITOIDS OF THE TARNISHED PLANT BUG, LYGUS LINEOLARIS (P. de B.) (HEMIPTERA: MIRIDAE), IN QUEBEC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P.H. Sohati ,
R.K. Stewart  and
G. Boivin
P.H. Sohati
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald College of McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 1CO
R.K. Stewart
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Macdonald College of McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada H9X 1CO
G. Boivin
Affiliation:
Research Station, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, St-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec, Canada J3B 628
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (P. de B.), is the dominant mirid in crops grown in eastern North America (Strong 1968; Bariola 1969). Lygus lineolaris is an ubiquitous species found on a wide range of wild plants and cultivated crops (Knight 1941).

All previously known egg parasitoids of Lygus spp. were mymarids in the genera Anaphes, Erythmelus, and Polynema (CIBC 1979). The mymarid Anaphes iole Girault is the principal egg parasitoid of Lygus spp. in the United States (Debolt 1987). It has been reported from British Columbia, Alberta, Ontario, Quebec, and the Northwest Territories(Huber and Rajakulendran 1988).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 121 , Issue 12 , December 1989 , pp. 1127 - 1128
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bariola, L.A. 1969. The biology of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (P. de Beauvois), and its nature of damage and control. Ph.D. thesis, Texas A & M University, College Station. 102 pp.Google Scholar
CIBC. 1979. Possibilities for the biological control of lygus bugs (Hemiptera, Miridae). Commonw. Inst. Biol. Status Pap. No. 15. 7 pp.Google Scholar
Clancy, D.W., and Pierce, H.D.. 1966. Natural enemies of some lygus bugs. J. econ. Ent. 59: 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debolt, J.W. 1987. Augmentation: rearing, release, and evaluation of plant bug parasites. pp. 82–87 in Hedlund, R.C., and Graham, H.M. (Eds.), Economic Importance and Biological Control of Lygus and Adelphocoris in North America. U.S.D.A. RS-64. 95 pp.Google Scholar
Doutt, R.L. 1949. The genus Erythmelus in California (Hymenoptera, Mymaridae). Pan-Pacific Ent. 25: 77–81.Google Scholar
Dozier, H.L. 1937. Descriptions of miscellaneous chalcidoid parasites from Puerto Rico (Hymenoptera). J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 21: 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J.T. 1986. Systematics, biology, and hosts of the Mymaridae and Mymarommatidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera): 1758–1984. Entomography 4: 185–243.Google Scholar
Huber, J.T., and Rajakulendran, V.K.. 1988. Redescription of and host-induced antennal variation in Anaphesiole Girault (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae), an egg parasite of Miridae (Hemiptera) in North America. Can. Ent. 120: 893–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, H.H. 1941. The plant bugs, or Miridae of Illinois. Bull. Ill. Stn. Nat. Hist. Surv. No. 22.Google Scholar
Romney, V.E., and Cassidy, T.P.. 1945. Anaphes ovijentatus, an egg-parasite of Lygus hesperus. J. econ. Ent. 38: 497–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strong, F.E. 1968. The selective advantage accruing to lygus bugs that cause blasting of floral parts. J. econ. Ent. 61: 315–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1929. Descriptions of new Canadian parasitic Hymenoptera. Can. Ent. 61: 190–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar