Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:12:13.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE EFFECTS OF ZECTRAN ON THE PARASITOIDS OF THE SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. E. Leonard  and
G. A. Simmons
D. E. Leonard
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Maine, Orono
G. A. Simmons
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Maine, Orono
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Where the insecticide Zectran was used to protect foliage from feeding of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), the per cent parasitism of dipteran parasitoids (Tachinidae) showed a statistically significant lower value. In treated areas, the per cent parasitism of the hymenopteran Ephialtes ontario (Cresson) (Ichneumonidae) was lower; Meteorus trachynotus Viereck was about the same; Apanteles fumiferanae Viereck, Glypta fumiferanae (Viereck) (Braconidae), and Trichogramma minutum Riley (Trichogrammatidae) were greater. None of these differences was statistically significant. Results were consistent for the 2 years of study with the exception of E. ontario which showed a significant lower percentage parasitism in areas treated 1 year. Absolute population numbers of parasitoids were lower than is suggested by comparisons of apparent parasitism levels. The lowest absolute numbers were found in tachinids and E. ontario. Parasitic hymenopterans and dipterans were among the adult insects killed by the aerial application of Zectran but none of the species collected was a major spruce budworm parasitoid.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 106 , Issue 5 , May 1974 , pp. 545 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1974

References

Anonymous. 1973. Proposed State of Maine Forestry Department cooperative spruce budworm suppression project — 1973. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Environ. State. 54 pp.Google Scholar
Bartlett, B. R. 1963. The contact toxicity of some pesticide residues to hymenopterous parasites and cocinellid predators. J. econ. Ent. 62: 270–271.Google Scholar
Coppel, H. C. 1960. Key to adults of dipterous parasites of spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 53: 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coughlin, J. 1968. The spruce budworm in Maine 1969. Maine For. Dep. Ent. Div. 46 pp.Google Scholar
Coughlin, J. 1971. The spruce budworm in Maine in 1971. Maine For. Dep. Ent. Div. 18 pp.Google Scholar
Dimond, J. B. 1967. Malathion trial for spruce budworm control. Me Farm. Res. 14: 18–30.Google Scholar
Coughlin, J. 1972. A demonstration of Bacillus thuringiensis plus the enzyme chitinase against the spruce budworm in Maine. 1. Efficacy. Misc. Rep. Me agric. Exp. Stn, No. 144. 34 pp.Google Scholar
Coughlin, J. 1974. Tests of Bacillus thuringiensis against the spruce budworm in Maine, 1973. Misc. Rep. Me agric. Exp. Stn., No. 153. 23 pp.Google Scholar
Dimond, J. B., Getchell, A. S., and Blease, J. A.. 1971. Accumulation and persistence of DDT in a lotic ecosystem. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 28: 1877–1882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowden, P. B., Buchanan, W. D., and Carolin, V. M.. 1948. Natural-control factors affecting the spruce budworm. J. econ. Ent. 41: 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, R. H. and Kingsley, N. P.. 1972. The timber resources of Maine. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Ser. Res. Bull. NE-26. 129 pp.Google Scholar
Jaynes, H. A. and Drooz, A. T.. 1952. The importance of parasites in the spruce budworm infestations in New York and Maine. J. econ. Ent. 45: 1057–1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kettela, E. G. and Varty, I. W.. 1972. Assessment of the 1971 spruce budworm spraying program in New Brunswick and forecast for 1972. Can. For. Serv. Dep. Envir. Marit. For. Res. Cen. Inf. Rep. M-X-29. 30 pp.Google Scholar
Klein, W. H. and Lewis, F. B.. 1966. Experimental spraying with Bacillus thuringiensis for control of spruce budworm. J. For. 64: 458–462.Google Scholar
Leonard, D. E. and Doane, C. C.. 1966. An artificial diet for the gypsy moth, Porthetria dispar (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 462–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, D. E., Simmons, G. A., and VanDerwerker, G. K.. 1973. Spruce budworm: techniques to improve counting of eggs. J. econ. Ent. 66: 992.Google Scholar
Macdonald, D. R. 1959. Biological assessment of aerial forest spraying against spruce budworm in New Brunswick. III. Effects on two overwintering parasites. Can. Ent. 91: 330–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, M. D. and Dewey, J. E.. 1969 (unpub.). Zectran pilot test to control spruce budworm. Rep. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Nor. Reg. 11 pp.Google Scholar
Nash, R. W., Peterson, J. W., and Chansler, J. W.. 1971. Environmental studies in the use of Accothion for spruce budworm control. State Me, Univ. Me, U.S. Dep. Int. Bur. Sp. Fish. Wildl., U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Coop. Rep. 103 pp.Google Scholar
Price, P. W. 1972. Immediate and long-term effects of insecticide application on parasitoids in jack pine stands in Quebec. Can. Ent. 104: 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, D. A. 1952. Key to the puparia of the dipterous parasites of Choristoneura fumiferana Clem. Can. Ent. 84: 108–112.Google Scholar
Scheffé, H. 1959. The analysis of variance. Wiley, New York. 477 pp.Google Scholar
Schmiege, D. C., Crisp, C. E., Lyon, R. L., Miskus, R. P., Roberts, R. B., and Shea, P. J.. 1970. Evaluation report on Zectran — a substitute for DDT in control of the western spruce budworm. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Pacif. SW. For. Range Exp. Stn. 35 pp.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. A. 1966. Parasitism by Trichogramma minutum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) in the spruce budworm outbreak in Maine. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 59: 723–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townes, H. and Townes, M.. 1960. Ichneumon-flies of America north of Mexico: 2. Subfamilies Ephialtinae, Xoridinae, Acaenitinae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 216: 75–76, 164–165, 283–287.Google Scholar
Varty, I. W., Titus, F. A., Renault, T. R., and Gesner, G. N.. 1971. Does fenitrothion spraying reduce parasitism of the spruce budworm? Bi-mon. Rep. Can. Dep. Fish. For. 27: 21.Google Scholar
Williams, C. B. Jr. and Walton, G. S.. 1968. Effects of Naled and Zectran on the budworm Choristoneura occidentalis and associated insects in Montana. J. econ. Ent. 61: 784–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. B. Jr., Walton, G. S., and Tiernan, C. F.. 1969. Zectran and Naled affect incidence of parasitism of the budworm Choristoneura occidentalis in Montana. J. econ. Ent. 62: 310–312.Google Scholar
Wilson, C. F. and Bean, J. L.. 1964. A field key to the adult hymenopterous parasites of the spruce budworm in Minnesota. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Lake St. For. Exp. Stn Res. Note LS-53. 4 pp.Google Scholar