Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:26:33.299Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFECTS OF THE CHEMOSTERILANT THIOTEPA ON THE SEXUPARAE AND SEXUALES OF THE PEA APHID, ACYRTHOSIPHON PISUM (HOMOPTERA: APHIDIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. L. Sharma
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1K 2R1
L. M. Thériault
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1K 2R1

Extract

Several chemosterilants have been tested against insects (Borkovec 1966). As a result, a total or partial sterility and decrease in fecundity have been noticed in several insects. Amongst Aphididae, Brevicoryne brassicae L., Myzus persicae Sulzer, Aphis fabae Scop., Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas, and Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) have been tested to determine the effects of chemosterilants like tepa, thiotepa, and metepa (Bonnemaison 1966; Bhalla and Robinson 1966, 1968; Chawla et al. 1973, 1974; Sharma et al. 1980; Steffan and Stüben 1976). In all previous work, either viviparae or their nymphal instars were the object of chemosterilant treatment and up to 95% reduction in fecundity was observed. Nothing to date has been described on the effect of chemosterilants on the sexuparae or sexuales of Aphididae. To continue with the results obtained by Sharma and Thériault (1980) and Sharma et al. (1980) on the viviparae, this paper describes the effects of 0.5% thiotepa [Tris (1-aziridinyl) phosphine sulphide] on sexuparae of the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris), and their progeny.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bhalla, O. P. and Robinson, A. G.. 1966. Effects of three chemosterilants on the pea aphid fed on an artificial diet. J. econ. Ent. 59(2): 378379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhalla, O. P. and Robinson, A. G.. 1968. Effects of chemosterilants and growth regulators on the pea aphid fed on an artificial diet. J. econ. Ent. 61(2): 552555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnemaison, L. 1966. Essais de substances chimiostérilisantes. I. Action sur divers Homoptères et Coléoptères. Phytiatrie-Phytopharmacie 15: 5974.Google Scholar
Borkovec, A. B. 1966. Insect Chemosterilants. Interscience, New York. 143 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
Chawla, S. S., Perron, J. M., and Huot, L.. 1973. Potato aphid. Effects of five chemosterilants. J. econ. Ent. 66(4): 963965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawla, S. S., Perron, J. M., and Cloutier, M.. 1974. Topical application effects of three chemosterilants on potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae. Phytoprotection 55(1): 4345.Google Scholar
Hewitt, E. J. 1963. Nutrition of plants in culture media. 2. Mineral nutrition of plants in culture media. pp. 97–111 in Plant Physiology, Vol. III. Academic Press, New York. 811 pp.Google Scholar
Sharma, M. L., Larrivée, J. M. et Thériault, L. M.. 1973. Effets de la photopériode et des températures moyennes de 15°C sur la fécondité et la production des sexués chez les pucerons du pois, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Aphididae: Homoptera). Can. Ent. 105: 947956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, M. L. and Thériault, L. M.. 1980. Effects of the chemosterilant thiotepa on the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Aphididae: Homoptera). Can. Ent. 112: 103105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, M. L., Thériault, L. M., and Gareau, A.. 1980. Effects of contact duration of 0.5% thiotepa on adult viviparae and subsequent generations of pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum (Aphididae: Homoptera). Can. Ent. 112: 13151316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffan, A. W. and Stüben, M.. 1976. Zur Ausschaltung des Fortpflanzyngvermogens Parthenogenetischer Weibchen von Aphis fabae Scop., durch Kontaktbehandlung mit chemosterilantien. Z. angew. Ent. 80(1): 5669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar