Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:31:22.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EFFECTS OF BLENDS OF SEX PHEROMONE ISOMERS ON MATING AND ELECTROANTENNOGRAMS OF SPRUCE BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

R. J. Ross
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3
W. D. Seabrook
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3
G. C. Lonergan
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3
P. Palaniswamy
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3
B. Ponder
Affiliation:
University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Male and female laboratory reared spruce budworm moths, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), were placed in cages in a conifer forest, and the surrounding air permeated by each of four blends of the E and Z isomers of the sex pheromone (11-tetradecenal) at two concentrations. Mating suppression of 53–83% was found for each blend tested. At one concentration the four suppressions were similar, while at the other only one was significantly different. Electroantennograms (EAGs) were obtained from male moths for each of six E:Z blends at four concentrations. EAGs were similar for most blends at a given concentration, but tended to be larger than at a blend of 0E:100Z.

These results were discussed using a current hypothesis on the ability of males to detect sex pheromone in air containing pockets of different isomeric blends.

Résumé

Des mâles et femelles de Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) élevées au laboratoire ont été mises en cage dans un boisé de conifères, et 4 mélanges des isomères E et Z de la phéromone sexuelle (11-tetradecenal) a 2 concentrations ont été incorporés à l'air ambiant. L'accouplement fut supprimé dans des proportions de 53–83% par les mélanges testés. A l'une des concentrations, les niveaux de suppression étaient similaires alors qu'à l'autre, l'un d'entre eux seulement était significativement différent. Des électroantennogrammes (EAG) de mâles ont été obtenus pour 6 mélanges E: Z à 4 concentrations. Les EAG se sont avérés similaires pour la plupart des mélanges à une concentration donnée, mais montraient une tendance à être plus élevés que pour un mélange 0E: 100Z.

Ces résultats sont interprétés en rapport avec l'hypothèse voulant que les mâles puissent détecter la phéromone sexuelle dans de l'air contenant des poches de mélanges isomériques différents.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

References

Palaniswamy, P., Ross, R. J., Seabrook, W. D., Lonergan, G. C., Wiesner, C. J., Tan, S. H., and Silk, P. J.. Mating suppression of caged spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) moths in different pheromone atmospheres and high population densities. J. econ. Ent., in press.Google Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. and Cardé, R. T.. 1977. Responses of Lepidoptera to synthetic sex pheromone chemicals and their analogues. A. Rev. Ent. 22: 377405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, R. J., Palaniswamy, P., and Seabrook, W. D.. 1979. Electroantennograms from spruce budworm moths (Choristoneura fumiferana) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) of different ages and for various pheromone concentrations. Can. Ent. 111: 807816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1979. The role of the sex pheromone in the management of spruce budworm. pp. 281–289 in Ritter, F. J. (Ed.), Chemical Ecology: Odour Communication in Animals. Elsevier North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York. 427 pp.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1981 a. Spruce budworm: effects of different blends of sex pheromone components on disruption of male attraction. Experientia 37: 11761178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1981 b. Sex attractant traps: their role in the management of spruce budworm, pp. 75–91 in Mitchell, E. R. (Ed.), Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals. Plenum Press, New York. 514 pp.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. 1981 c. Disruption of spruce budworm mating—state of the art. pp. 339–349 in Mitchell, E. R. (Ed.), Management of Insect Pests with Semiochemicals. Plenum Press, New York. 514 pp.Google Scholar
Sanders, C. J. and Weatherston, J.. 1976. Sex pheromone of the eastern spruce budworm (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): Optimum blend of trans- and cis-11-tetradecenal. Can. Ent. 108: 12851290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, J. O., Seabrook, W. D., Ross, R. J., Darvesh, S., and Lonergan, G.. 1980. Spruce budworm: roles of pheromone components and analogues in male disruption and attraction. Experientia 36: 222223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seabrook, W. D. 1978. Neurobiological contributions to understanding insect pheromone systems. A. Rev. Ent. 23: 471485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H. H. 1977. Manipulation of insect pests of agricultural crops. pp. 353–367 in Shorey, H. H. and McKelvey, J. J. Jr., (Eds.), Chemical Control of Insect Behavior. Wiley, Toronto. 414 pp.Google Scholar
Silk, P. J., Tan, S. H., Wiesner, C. J., Ross, R. J., and Lonergan, G. C.. 1980. Sex pheromone chemistry of the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana. Environ. Ent. 9: 640644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar