Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:57:14.897Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON THE TOXICITY OF SEVERAL PESTICIDES TO PHYTOSEIULUS PERSIMILIS (ACARINA: PHYTOSEIIDAE) AND TETRANYCHUS URTICAE (ACARINA: TETRANYCHIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

P. R. Everson  and
N. V. Tonks
P. R. Everson
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 1H3
N. V. Tonks
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Sidney, British Columbia V8L 1H3
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationship between posttreatment temperatures of 15°, 20°, 25°, and 30°C and toxicity of six pesticides to adult female Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Tetranychus urticae Koch were studied in the laboratory.

The toxicities of cyhexatin, dicofol, propargite, citrazon, chlorobenzilate, and per-methrin were positively correlated with temperature. Except for propargite and permefhrin, P. persimilis was less susceptible than T. urticae at 15° and 20°C, but equal in susceptibility at 25° and 30°C.

The results obtained may indicate a potential value of posttreatment temperature manipulation as a useful adjunct to integrated pest control programs in glasshouses.

Résumé

La relation entre des températures post-traitement de 15, 20, 25 et 30°C, et la toxicité de 6 pesticides pour les femelles adultes de Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot et Tetranychus urticae Koch a été étudiée en laboratoire.

La toxicité du cyhexatin, dicofol, propargite, citrazo, chlorobenzilate et permethrin s’est avérée positivement corrélée à la température. Sauf pour le propargite et le permethrin, P. persimilis était moins susceptible que T. urticae à 15 et 20°C, bien qu’également susceptible à 25 et 30°C.

Les résultats obtenus suggèrent l’utilité potentielle de manipulations de la température post-traitement en tant que tactique d’appoint dans programmes de lutte intégrées en serres.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 113 , Issue 4 , April 1981 , pp. 333 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

DeVries, D. H. and Georghiou, G. P.. 1979. Influence of temperature on the toxicity of insecticides to susceptible and resistant house flies. J. econ. Ent. 72: 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, R. S. and Moilliet, T. K.. 1970. Plictran as an orchard acaricide in British Columbia. Can. Ent. 102: 1604–1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downing, R. S. and Moilliet, T. K.. 1975. Preliminary trials with citrazon—a selective acaricide. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 72: 3–5.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. 1971. Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press. 3rd ed., 1971.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. W. and Hansell, R. I. C.. 1964. Effect of pre- and post-treatment temperatures, age of deposit, and repellency on the toxicity of kelthane to the two-spotted mite, Tetranychus telarius (L.) (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Can. Ent. 96: 1307–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, H. J. 1970. Preliminary studies of an integrated control programme for cucumber pests and an evaluation of methods of introducing Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot for the control of Tetranychus urticae Koch. Ann. appl. Biol. 66: 505–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. R. and Kinoshita, G. B.. 1977. Influence of posttreatment temperature on the toxicity of pyrethroid insecticides. J. econ. Ent. 70: 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, S. M., Abo-Elghar, M. R., Elbadry, E. A., and Zohdy, G. I.. 1970. Studies on the chemical control of a fruit tree false spider mite, Cenopalpus pulcher, in the United Arab Republic. II. Relationships between temperature and toxicity of 3 acaricides. J. econ. Ent. 63: 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoyt, S. C. and Burts, E. C.. 1974. Integrated control of fruit pests. A. Rev. Ent. 19: 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeppson, L. R., McMurtry, J. A., Mead, D. W., Jesser, M. J., and Johnson, H. G.. 1975. Toxicity of citrus pesticides to some predacious phytoseiid mites. J. econ. Ent. 68: 707–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markkula, M. 1976. Studies and experiences on the biological control of the most important pests on glasshouse cultures in Finland. SROP/WRPS Bull. 4: 38–45.Google Scholar
Murdoch, W. W. and Oaten, A.. 1975. Predation and population stability. Adv. ecol. Res. 9: 2–131.Google Scholar
Newsom, L. D. 1974. Predator insecticide relationships. Entomophaga, Mem. H.S. 7: 13–23.Google Scholar
Roush, R. T. and Hoy, M. A.. 1978. Relative toxicity of permethrin to a predator, Metaseiulus occidentalis and its prey, Tetranychus urticae. Environ. Ent. 7: 287–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theaker, T. L. and Tonks, N. V.. 1977. A method for rearing the predacious mite Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 74: 8–9.Google Scholar
Tonks, N. V. and Everson, P.. 1977. Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) for control of two-spotted mites in a commercial greenhouse. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columb. 74: 7–8.Google Scholar
susceptible and resistant house flies. J. econ. Ent. 72: 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar