Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:07:25.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECT OF POTATO FOLIAGE INFECTED WITH POTATO LEAFROLL VIRUS ON FECUNDITY AND LONGEVITY OF THE COLORADO POTATO BEETLE, LEPTINOTARSA DECEMLINEATA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. Boiteau  and
R. P. Singh
G. Boiteau
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 4Z7
R. P. Singh
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture Canada, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 4Z7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Female Colorado potato beetles fed foliage of Solarium tuberosum of the Russet Burbank variety infected with potato leafroll virus have lower fecundity and shorter longevity than those fed virus-free foliage. Also, female beetles prefer feeding on foliage infected with potato leafroll virus. This observation could be of importance in the development of resistant varieties of potatoes to potato beetles.

Résumé

Les femelles du doryphore de la pomme de terre nourries du feuillage de Solarium tuberosum de la variété Russet Burbank infecté par le virus de l'enroulement des feuilles ont une fécondité et une longévité inférieures à celles qui sont nourries de feuillage libre de virus. Aussi, les femelles du doryphore préfèrent s'alimenter sur le feuillage infecté par le virus de l'enroulement. Cette observation pourrait être importante dans le développement de variétés résistantes aux doryphores.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 114 , Issue 6 , June 1982 , pp. 473 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boiteau, G. 1980. A white color morph of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 112: 975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cibula, A. B., Davidson, R. H., Fisk, F. W., and Lapidus, J. B.. 1967. Relationship of free amino acids of some solanaceous plants to growth and development of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera = Chrysomelidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 626–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Derridj, S. 1976. Influence de la température pendant la culture de la variété de pomme de terre Kennebec (Solanum tuberosum L.) sur la biologie du doryphore (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say – Coléoptère – Chrysomelidae) au laboratoire. Ann. Zool.-Ecol. Anim. 8: 339–346.Google Scholar
Gibbs, A. 1980. A plant virus that partially protects its wild legume host against herbivores. Intervirology 13: 42–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gildow, F. E. 1980. Increased production of alatae by aphids reared on oats infected with barley yellow dwarf virus. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 73: 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grison, G. 1958. L'influence de la plante-hôte sur la fécondité des insectes phytophages. Entomologia exp. appl. 1: 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, T. H. 1972. Chemical feeding requirements of oligophagous insects. pp. 225–240in Rodriguez, J. G. (Ed.), Insect and Mite Nutrition. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Krzymanska, Jadwiga. 1978. Phospholipids of potato leaves and their influence on the physiology of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say). (In Polish.) Prace Naukowe Instytutu Ochrony Roslin 19: 5–56.Google Scholar
Maramorosch, K. 1980. Insects and plant pathogens. pp. 137–156in Maxwell, F. G. and Jennings, P. R. (Ed.), Breeding Plants Resistant to Insects. Wiley.Google Scholar
Sinden, S. L., Sanford, L. L. and Osman, J. F.. 1980. Glycoalkaloids and resistance to the Colorado potato beetle in Solanum chacoense Bitter. Am. Potato J. 57: 331–343.Google Scholar
Singh, R. P. and McDonald, J. G.. 1981. Purification of potato virus A and its detection in potato by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Am. Potato J. 58: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar