Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:16:52.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

EFFECT OF MALE-DEPRIVATION ON FEMALE PHONOTAXIS IN FIELD CRICKETS (ORTHOPTERA: GRYLLIDAE; GRYLLUS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

William H. Cade
William H. Cade
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario L2S 3A1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of depriving female field crickets of conspecific male contact upon the frequency of phonotaxic response to conspecific mating song was tested in Gryllus integer Scudder and G. veletis Alexander and Bigelow (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). In both species, positive phonotaxis was 5 to 9 times more frequent in male-deprived females than in females kept with males. Increased phonotaxis in the former group was apparent with 3 days separation. Addition of G. veletis males to the female-only culture greatly reduced subsequent phonotaxis. As female field crickets sometimes occur in male-free areas in the field, such increased phonotaxis may well be of adaptive importance.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 111 , Issue 6 , June 1979 , pp. 741 - 744
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, R. D. 1967. Acoustical communication in arthropods. A. Rev. Ent. 12: 495–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, R. D. 1968. Life cycle origins, speciation, and related phenomena in crickets. Q. Rev. Biol. 43: 1–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cade, W. H. 1976. Male reproductive competition and sexual selection in the field cricket Gryllus integer. Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
Cade, W. H. 1979 a. The evolution of alternative reproductive strategies in field crickets. In Blum, M. S. and Blum, N. A. (Eds.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cade, W. H. 1979 b. Field cricket dispersal flights measured by crickets landing at lights. Tex. J. Sci. 31: 125–130.Google Scholar
Engelmann, F. 1970. The physiology of insect reproduction. Pergamon, New York.Google Scholar
Hill, G., Loftus-Hills, J. J., and Gartside, D. F.. 1972. Premating isolation between the Australian field crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Aust. J. Zool. 20: 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörmann-Heck, S. von. 1957. Untersuchungen über den Erbgang einiger Verhaltensweisen bei Grillen-bastarden. (Gryllus campestris L. ∼ Gryllus bimaculatus De Geer). Z. Tierpsychol. 14: 137–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus-Hills, J. J., Littlejohn, M. J., and Hill, K. G.. 1971. Auditory sensitivity of the crickets Teleogryllus commodus and T. oceanicus. Nature (London) New Biol. 223: 184–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moiseff, A., Pollack, G. S., and Hoy, R. R.. 1978. Steering responses of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: Mate attraction and predator avoidance. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75: 4052–4056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, G. K., Kerr, G. E., and Gwynne, D. T.. 1975. Ontogeny of phonotaxis in Orchelimum gladiator (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae; Conocephalinae). Can. J. Zool. 53: 1127–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, R. C. 1976. Species specificity in the phonotaxis of female ground crickets (Orthoptera; Gryllidae; Nemobiinae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 69: 1007–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popov, A. V. and Shuvalov, V. F.. 1977. Phonotactic behavior of crickets. J. comp. Physiol. 119: 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.. 1967. Statistical Methods. Iowa State University, Ames. 6th ed.Google Scholar
Ulagaraj, S. M. and Walker, T. J.. 1973. Phonotaxis of crickets in flight: attraction of male and female crickets to male calling songs. Science 182: 1278–1279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ulagaraj, S. M. and Walker, T. J.. 1975. Response of flying mole crickets to three parameters of synthetic songs broadcast outdoors. Nature 253: 530–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T. J. 1957. Specificity in the response of female tree crickets to calling songs of the males. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 50: 626–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaretsky, M. D. 1972. Specificity of the calling song and short term changes in the phonotactic response by female crickets, Scapsipedus marginatus (Gryllidae). J. comp. Physiol. 79: 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar