Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:03:26.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Light and Temperature on the Behaviour of Adults of the White Pine Weevil, Pissodes strobi Peck.1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. R. Sullivan
C. R. Sullivan
Affiliation:
Forest Insect Laboratory, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This study was undertaken as part of an investigation of the physical and biological requirements of the white pine weevil Pissodes strobi Peck. The broad aspects of the main problem will be given in a later paper and it need only be mentioned here that the immediate objective was to define the requirements of the weevil in terms of measurable factors of the environment. During the field studies, observed variations in behaviour between individual weevils within the limits of a single habitat indicated the need for additional studies that would permit analysis of behaviour in relation to previous conditioning. The responses of the adult weevils to diffuse and discrete light sources, and the effect of temperature on these responses, were investigated in conjunction with field studies of behavioural changes during relatively stable and variable weather conditions, in an attempt to explain observed weevil movements.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 91 , Issue 4 , April 1959 , pp. 213 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Dethier, V. G. 1957. Communication by insects: Physiology of dancing. Science 125: 331–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Dolley, W. L., and White, J. D.. 1951. The effect of illuminance on the reversal temperature in the drone fly, Eristalis tenax. Biol. Bull. 100: 84–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Green, G. W. 1954. Some laboratory investigations of the light reactions of larvae of Neodiprion americanus banksianae Roh. and N. lecontei (Fitch) (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Can. Entomologist 86: 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Jack, R. W., and Williams, W. L.. 1937. The effect of temperature on the reaction of Glossina morsitans Westw. to light. Bull. Ent. Res. 28: 499–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. MacAloney, H. J. 1930. The white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi Peck). Its biology and control. N.Y. State Coll. For. Bull. 3: 5–87.Google Scholar
6.Menusan, H. 1935. Effect of constant light, temperature and humidity on the rate and total amount of oviposition of the bean weevil, Bruchus obtectus Say. J. Econ. Ent. 28: 448–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Sullivan, C. R., and Wellington, W. G.. 1953. The light reactions of larvae of the tent caterpillars, Malacosama disstria Hbn., M. americanum (Fab.) and M. pluviale (Dyar). (Lepidottera: Lasiocampidae). Can. Entomologist 85: 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wellington, W. G. 1948. The light reactions of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana Clemens. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Entomologist 80: 56–82A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Wellington, W. G. 1950. Effects of radiation on the temperatures of insectan habitats. Sci. Agr. 30: 209–234.Google Scholar
10.Wellington, W. G., Sullivan, C. R., and Henson, W. R.. 1954. The light reactions of larvae of the spotless fall webworm, Hyphantria textor Harr. (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Can. Entomologist 86: 529–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar