Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:21:23.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

EARLY GROUND APPLICATION OF ACEPHATE FOR CONTROL OF THE WESTERN SPRUCE BUDWORM (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) ON DOUGLAS-FIR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. Wayne Brewer
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Entomology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins
J. O’Neal
Affiliation:
U. S. Department of Agriculture, APHIS, Fort Lauderdale, Florida

Abstract

The insecticide acephate (0.5-dimethyl acetyl phosphoramidothioate) was applied at 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 lb A.I./gal (.058, 0.118, 0.179 kg/l.) in aqueous solution to individual Douglas-fir trees infested with western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis Freeman, larvae in central Washington using hand held ground application equipment. Application was made when larvae were in the needle mining – bud mining stage at rates ranging from 2.58 to 5.10 gal/acre (3.97 to 7.84 l./ha). For all three concentrations, mortality of larvae inside needles was 94–98% after 1 day compared with a check mortality of 18% and larval mortality inside buds was 99% after 1 day compared with 23% for the check. Regression analyses indicated that defoliation was positively correlated with the number of needles mined the current year and per cent punctured buds, and negatively correlated with larval mortality inside both needles and buds. The data suggest that when applied at the rates used, acephate has some type of systemic action and can provide foliage protection during the year of application.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, J.A. and Nigam, P.C.. 1975. The effectiveness of aerial application of Orthene against spruce budworm at Petawawa Forest Experimental Station during 1974. Rep. Chem. Control Res. Inst. Can. For. Serv. CC-X-82. 29 pp.Google Scholar
Carolin, V. M. and Honing, F. M.. 1972. Western spruce budworm. U.S. Dep. Agric. For. Serv. Pest Leafl. 53.Google Scholar
Dewey, J.W. 1970. Damage to Douglas-fir cones by Choristoneura occidentalis. J. econ. Ent. 63: 18041806.Google Scholar
Keen, F. P. 1952. Insect enemies of Western forests. Misc. Publ. U.S. Dep. Agric. 273. 280 pp.Google Scholar
Hopewell, W.W. and Nigam, P. C.. 1974. Field evaluation of Orthene, phoxim and fenitrothion against spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana), applied as simulated aerial spray. Rep. Dep. Environ. Can. For. Serv. CC-X-83.Google Scholar
Lyon, R. L. 1973. Reports from the Insecticide Evaluation Project PSW2203 U.S.D.A. F.S., Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp. Sta. P.O. Box 245, Berkeley, CA, 94701.Google Scholar
McGugan, B. M. 1954. Needle-mining habits and larval instars of the spruce budworm. Can. Ent. 86: 439454.Google Scholar
Nigam, P. C. 1975. Strategic chemicals for protection of coniferous forests from insect pests. Inf. Rep. Chem. Control Res. Inst. CC-X-92. 6 pp.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. L., Gillette, N. L., Look, M., Lucas, B. A., and Lyon, R. L.. 1976. Toxicity of selected insecticides applied to western spruce budworm. J. econ. Ent. 69: 99104.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. 1956. Statistical methods. Iowa St. Univ. Press, Ames. 534 pp.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H.. 1960. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
Werner, R. A. 1974. Penetration and persistence of systemic insecticides in seeds and seedlings of southern pines. J. econ. Ent. 67: 8184.Google Scholar