Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:21:41.589Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DISTRIBUTION OF CHRYSOLINA SPP. (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) IN EASTERN ONTARIO, 18 YEARS AFTER THEIR INITIAL RELEASE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Paul G. Fields
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5
John T. Arnason
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5
Bernard J.R. Philogène
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5

Extract

Hypericum perforatum L., St. John's - wort (Hypericaceae), is a cosmopolitan weed that, when eaten by livestock, causes photodermatitis, reduced weight gain, and, in extreme cases, death (Giese 1980). Chrysolina hyperici (Forester) and Chrysolina quadrigemina (Suffr.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) dramatically reduced populations of H. perforatum when introduced into Australia (Clark 1953) and the United States (Holloway and Huffaker 1951; Holloway 1957). These species also have served as effective biocontrol agents when introduced into central British Columbia (Smith 1958), Ontario, and Nova Scotia (Harris and Maw 1984). This paper surveys the distribution of Chrysolina spp. in eastern Ontario, 18 years after initial release of both species.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, W.J. 1962. The American species of Chrysolina Mots. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 94: 5874.Google Scholar
Clark, L.R. 1953. The ecology of Chrysomela gemellata Rossi and C. hyperici Forst., and their effect on St. John's Wort in the Bright District, Victoria. Aust. J. Zool. 1: 169.Google Scholar
Giese, A.C. 1980. Hypericism. pp. 229–255 in Smith, K.C. (Ed.), Photochemical and Photobiological Reviews, Vol. 5. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Harris, P., and Maw, M.. 1984. Hypericum perforatum L., St. John's – wort (Hypericaceae). pp. 171–177 in Kelleher, J.S., and Hulme, M.A. (Eds.), Biological Control Programmes Against Insects and Weeds in Canada 1969–1980. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Sloagh, England.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.K. 1957. Weed control by insects. Sci. Am. 197: 5662.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.K., and Huffaker, C.B.. 1951. The role of Chrysolina gemellata in the biological control of Klamath weed. J. econ. Ent. 44: 244247.Google Scholar
Johansson, S. 1962. Insect associated with Hypericum L. I. Host plant and Coleoptera. Opusc. Ent. 27: 128146.Google Scholar
McNeil, J.N., Duchesne, R., and Comeau, A.. 1975. Known distribution of the European Skipper, Thymelicus lineola (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), in Quebec. Can. Ent. 107: 12211225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J.M. 1958. Biological control of Klamath weed, Hypericum perforatum L., in British Columbia. Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Ent. 4: 561565.Google Scholar