Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:24:38.327Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE DIMORPHISM IN THE MALE COPULATORY ORGAN OF THE CHRYSOMELID ARTHROCHLAMYS BEBBIANAE BROWN*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

W. J. Brown
W. J. Brown
Affiliation:
Ottawa, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Arthrochlamys bebbianae Brown is a small chrysomelid that occurs rather commonly in the Ottawa District. It is one of a group of species that have been confused under the names Chlamys gibbosa (Fab.) and C. plicata (Fab.). Both its larvae, which are case-bearers, and its adults feed on the leaves and on the epidermis of the new growth of a willow, Salix Bebbiana Sarg. The speries appears to be monophagous, and it tends to occur in diffuse colonies.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 76 , Issue 4 , April 1944 , pp. 70 - 72
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

1.Brown, W. J.The Canadian species of Exema and Arthrochlamys (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Canad. Ent., 75: 119–131, 5 figs. 1943.Google Scholar
2.Darlington, P. J. Jr., Variation and atrophy of flying wings of some carabid beetles. Ann. Ent. Soc. Am., 29: 136–179, 3 pls., 2 figs. 1936.Google Scholar
3.Darlington, P. I. Jr., The American Patrobini (Coleoptera, Carabidae). Ent. Amer., 18: 135–183, 5 pls., 4 figs. 1938.Google Scholar
4.Dobzhansky, Th.Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y., XVI + 364 pp. 1937.Google Scholar
5.Ford, E. B. Polymorphism ard taxcromy. In The new systematics, ed. by Huxley, J., pp. 493–513. Clarendon Press. Oxford. 1940.Google Scholar
5.Horn, W.Gibt es bei Insekten echten Dimorphismus der männlichen Kopulations-Organe. Ent. Blätter, 28: 66–67, 7 figs. 1932.Google Scholar
7.Horn, W.Revision der Gattung Pogonostoma (Col. Cicind.). Arb. Morph, Tax. Ent., 1: 7–35, 2 pls., 9 figs. 1934.Google Scholar