Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:09:48.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DEVELOPMENT OF A CHEMICAL CONTROL STRATEGY FOR THE PINE FALSE WEBWORM, ACANTHOLYDA ERYTHROCEPHALA (L.) (HYMENOPTERA: PAMPHILIIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. Barry Lyons ,
Blair V. Helson ,
Geraldine C. Jones  and
John W. McFarlane
D. Barry Lyons
Affiliation:
Forestry Canada, Ontario Region, PO Box 490, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7
Blair V. Helson
Affiliation:
Forestry Canada, Forest Pest Management Institute, PO Box 490, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7
Geraldine C. Jones
Affiliation:
Forestry Canada, Ontario Region, PO Box 490, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7
John W. McFarlane
Affiliation:
Forestry Canada, Forest Pest Management Institute, PO Box 490, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada P6A 5M7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The pine false webworm, Acantholyda erythrocephala (L.) (Hymenoptera: Pamphiliidae), is an introduced sawfly that is becoming increasingly important as a pest of pine plantations in Ontario. Laboratory bioassays of 10 insecticides, applied to excised pine branches containing eggs immediately prior to hatching, indicated that carbaryl and permethrin at low dosages were efficacious in controlling larvae. Neither carbaryl nor permethrin affected egg hatch, and field trials at various dosages indicated that 500 g AI per ha of carbaryl significantly reduced larval numbers and mitigated defoliation of 1-year-old and current-year foliage. Comparisons of single early (during egg hatch), single late (mean instar about 3.8), and combinations of early and late applications of lower concentrations of both chemicals suggested that the late application better reduced webworm populations. All tested application rates of permethrin and carbaryl provided significant foliar protection, particularly to current-year foliage. Dosages as low as 35 g AI per ha of permethrin and 125 g AI per ha of carbaryl in mistblower applications of third- and fourth-instar larvae may provide suitable protection, depending on management objectives. Ground applications using a mistblower resulted in no differences in efficacy on branches from different vertical strata, but reduced efficacy was observed on branches on the sides of the trees opposite where sprays were applied. Spray drift tests with carbaryl at 500 g AI per ha indicated that some population reduction occurred in trees up to two 2.1-m-spaced rows downwind from treated trees. Thus, each row would not need to be sprayed in operational programs.

Résumé

Le pamphile Acantholyda erythrocephala (L.) (Hymenoptera : Pamphiliidae) est une mouche-à-scie allogène en voie de devenir extrêmement nuisible dans les plantations de pins en Ontario. Des tests en laboratoire au moyen de 10 insecticides appliqués à des branches de pins coupées contenant des oeufs sur le point d’éclore ont démontré que le carbaryle et la perméthrine utilisés en faibles doses peuvent contrôler efficacement les larves. Ni l’un ni l’autre de ces produits n’affectent l’éclosion des oeufs et des tests en nature de doses diverses ont indiqué qu’une dose de 500 g AI par ha de carbaryle réduit considérablement le nombre de larves et atténue la défoliation du feuillage de 1 an et du feuillage de l’année. La comparaison entre des applications uniques hâtives (au cours de l’éclosion des oeufs), des applications uniques tardives (stade moyen 3,8) et des applications hâtives et tardives combinées de concentrations plus faibles des deux produits indique qu’une application tardive réduit plus efficacement la population de pamphiles. Tous les régimes d’application de perméthrine et de carbaryle essayés ont fourni une bonne protection au feuillage, particulièrement au feuillage de l’année en cours. Des doses faibles, 35 g AI par ha de perméthrine et 125 g AI par ha de carbaryle, appliquées par vaporisation à des larves de troisième et de quatrième stades peuvent assurer la protection adéquate du feuillage, selon les objectifs poursuivis. Des applications au sol par vaporisation ont la même efficacité sur toutes les branches des différentes strates verticales, mais les branches situées sur l’arbre du côté opposé de la valorisation ne sont pas aussi bien protégées. Des tests sur la portée de la vaporisation au moyen de carbaryle à raison de 500 g AI par ha ont démontré que les traitements sont efficaces même sur les arbres des rangées situées à 2,1 m à vau-vent des arbres traités. Il n’est donc pas nécessaire de vaporiser chaque rangée d’arbres au cours des programmes de contrôle.

[Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 125 , Issue 3 , June 1993 , pp. 499 - 511
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, W.S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology 18: 265–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eidt, D.C., and McPhee, J.R.. 1963. Acantholyda erythrocephala (L.) new in Canada. Canadian Department of Forestry Bi-monthly Progress Report 19(4): 2.Google Scholar
Emond, F.J., and Cerezke, H.F.. 1990. Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and the Northwest Territories in 1989 and Predictions for 1990. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region Information Report NOR–X–313: 23 pp.Google Scholar
Griswold, C.L. 1939. Introduced pine sawfly. Journal of Economic Entomology 32: 474–478.Google Scholar
Hofacker, T.H., Loomis, R.C., and Worrall, A.J.. 1989. Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the United States 1988. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC. 102 pp.Google Scholar
Howse, G.M., Syme, P.D., and Gross, H.L.. 1982. Ontario region. pp. 39–54 in Annual Reports of the Forest Insect and Disease Survey 1978 and 1979. Department of the Environment, Canadian Forestry Service, Ottawa, Ontario. 58 pp.Google Scholar
Knerer, G. 1984. Diprionid sawflies: Biological topics and rearing techniques (Hymenoptera: Symphyta). Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America 30: 53–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Middlekauff, W.W. 1938. Occurrence of a European sawfly A. erythrocephala (L.) in N.Y. State. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 46: 438.Google Scholar
Middlekauff, W.W. 1958. The North American sawflies of the genera Acantholyda, Cephalcia, and Neurotoma (Hymenoptera, Pamphiliidae). University of California Publications in Entomology 14: 51–174.Google Scholar
Moody, B.H. (compiler). 1990. Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in Canada 1988. Forestry Canada. 105 pp.Google Scholar
Pieper, G.R. 1979. Residue analysis of carbaryl on forest foliage and in stream water using HPLC. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology 22: 167–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plumb, G.H. 1945. Miscellaneous insect notes. Connecticut State Entomologist, 44th Report, Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin (New Haven) 488: 420–421.Google Scholar
Robertson, J.L., and Haverty, M.I.. 1981. Multiphase laboratory bioassays to select chemicals for field testing on the western spruce budworm. Journal of Economic Entomology 74: 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Schwerdtfeger, F. 1944. Further observations on the biology of the pine false webworm, Acantholyda erythrocephala L. Zeitschrift für angewandte Entomologie 30: 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soraci, F.A. 1938. Distribution of the sawfly Acantholyda erythrocephala in New Jersey. Journal of the New York Entomological Society 46: 444.Google Scholar
Sundaram, K.M.S., Helson, B.V., and Payne, N.J.. 1992. Distribution and persistence of permethrin in some terrestrial components of a forest environment. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 40: 2523–2529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, K.M.S., and LeCompte, P.E.. 1975. Persistence Studies of Insecticides: v. Degradation of carbaryl on white pine leaders (Pinus strobus L.) after aerial application for control of white pine weevil (Pissodes strobi Peck) in Ontario, 1974. Environment Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Chemical Control Research Institute Information Report CC–X–98: 16 pp.Google Scholar
Syme, P.D. 1981. Occurrence of the introduced sawfly Acantholyda erythrocephala (L.) in Ontario. Department of the Environment, Canadian Forestry Service Research Notes 1: 4–5.Google Scholar
Wells, A.B. 1926. Notes on tree and shrub insects in southwestern Pennsylvania. Entomological News 37: 254–258.Google Scholar
West, R.J., Raske, A.G., and Sundaram, A.. 1989. Efficacy of oil-based formulations of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner var. kurstaki against the hemlock looper, Lambdina fiscellaria (Guen.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). The Canadian Entomologist 121: 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, L.F. 1977. A Guide to Insect Injury of Conifers in the Lake States. United States Department of Agriculture Agricultural Handbook 501: 218 pp.Google Scholar