Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:01:00.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DESCRIPTIONS OF FLEA LARVAE (SIPHONAPTERA: CERATOPHYLLIDAE: CERATOPHYLLUS SPP.) FOUND IN THE NESTS OF SWALLOWS (AVES: PASSERIFORMES: HIRUNDINIDAE) IN NORTH AMERICA, NORTH OF MEXICO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Robert L.C. Pilgrim  and
Terry D. Galloway
Robert L.C. Pilgrim*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
Terry D. Galloway
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
*
1 Author to whom all corresponding should be addressed (E-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Descriptions are provided for larvae of nine species of Ceratophyllus Curtis for which swallows in North America, north of Mexico, are recorded hosts. A detailed description is provided for the larva of Ceratophyllus celsus celsus Jordan and for other species only where there are significant differences from C. c. celsus. Ceratophyllus celsus celsus, Ceratophyllus scopulorum Holland, and Ceratophyllus petrochelidoni Wagner are characterized by a large number of anal comb (25–42) and anal mound (13–23) setae, but among themselves have not proved separable; Ceratophyllus styx riparius Jordan and Rothschild is remarkable in having two ventral plate setae on all thoracic segments as well as on the eighth and occasionally the ninth abdominal segments; Ceratophyllus idius Jordan and Rothschild and Ceratophyllus niger C. Fox characteristically display stout ventral plate setae on the thoracic segments, as seen in C. c. celsus, but have fewer anal comb and mound setae. We are unable to separate larvae of C. idius and C. niger from each other. Ceratophyllus gallinae (Schrank) also has few comb and mound setae, but the ventral plate setae are more slender than evident in other species treated here. Ceratophyllus diffinis Jordan and Ceratophyllus garei Rothschild, the sole Nearctic representatives of the subgenus Emmareus Smit, are characterized by their short, slender, thoracic ventral plate setae, but have not been separated from each other here. Redescriptions are provided for larvae of C. gallinae and C. garei. Descriptions for all other taxa are provided for the first time. A key is provided to the known larvae of species associated with swallows in North America, north of Mexico.

Résumé

On trouvera ici la description des larves de neuf espèces de Ceratophyllus Curtis, parasites des hirondelles en Amérique du Nord au nord du Mexique. Les larves de Ceratophyllus celsus celsus Jordan sont décrites en détail, de même que les larves d’autres espèces lorsqu’elles diffèrent significativement de C. c. celsus. Ceratophyllus celsus celsus, Ceratophyllus scopulorum Holland et Ceratophyllus petrochelidoni Wagner sont caractérisées par un grand nombre de soies sur le peigne anal (25–42) et sur la protubérance anale (13–23), mais ces espèces se sont avérées impossibles à distinguer les unes des autres. Ceratophyllus styx riparius Jordan et Rothschild se distingue par la présence de deux soies sur la plaque ventrale de tous les segments thoraciques ainsi que sur le huitième et quelquefois le neuvième segment abdominal; Ceratophyllus idius Jordan et Rothschild et Ceratophyllus niger C. Fox portent des soies épaisses sur la plaque ventrale des segments thoraciques, comme C. c. celsus, mais ont moins de soies sur le peigne anal et sur la protubérance anale. Il est impossible de distinguer les larves de C. idius et de C. niger. Ceratophyllus gallinae (Schrank) n’a que peu de soies sur le peigne anal et sur la protubérance anale, mais les soies de la plaque ventrale sont plus fines que celles qu’on observe chez les autres espèces traitées ici. Ceratophyllus diffinis Jordan et Ceratophyllus garei Rothschild, les seuls représentants du sous genre Emmareus Smit dans la zone néarctique, sont caractérisés par leurs soies courtes et fines sur la plaque thoracique ventrale, mais ces espèces n’ont pas été séparées l’un de l’autre ici. Les larves de C. gallinae et de C. garei sont décrites de nouveau, mais les descriptions de tous les autre taxons sont inédites. Une clef permettra d’identifier les larves connues des espèces associées aux hirondelles de l’Amérique du Nord au nord du Mexique.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 132 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 15 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacot, A.W., Ridewood, W.G. 1914. Observations on the larvae of fleas. Parasitology 7: 157–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, A.H. 1980. An Atlas of the Fleas of the Eastern United States. Fredonia: Marginal MediaGoogle Scholar
Benton, A.H. 1998. Hybridization in North American bird fleas of the genus Ceratophyllus (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae). Journal of Medical Entomology 35: 433–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benton, A.H., Shatrau, V. 1962. Notes on a collection of bird fleas from Grand Manan, New Brunswick. The Canadian Entomologist 94: 743–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, A.H., Surman, M., Krinsky, W.L. 1979. Observations on the feeding habits of some larval fleas (Siphonaptera). Journal of Parasitology 65: 671–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chilton, G., Galloway, T.D. 1995. Fleas (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae) from nests of white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys) in southwestern Alberta, Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 127: 443–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, T.K., Dugdale, J.S., Watt, J.C. 1976. Recording specimen localities in New Zealand: an arbitrary system of areas and codes defined. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 3: 69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbel, R.E. 1951. Comparative studies on the larvae of certain species of fleas (Siphonaptera). Journal of Parasitology 37: 119–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbel, R.E. 1991. Order Siphonaptera. pp. 674–89 in Stehr, R.W. (Ed.), Immature Insects. Vol. 2. Dubuque: Kend-all/Hunt Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Erskine, A.J. 1979. Man's influence on potential nesting sites and populations of swallows in Canada. Canadian Field-Naturalist 93: 371–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, T.D. 1987. Fleas collected from cliff swallow nests in Ontario. Ontario Birds 5: 113–5Google Scholar
Haas, G.E., Wilson, N. 1979. Fleas (Siphonaptera) from nests of the cliff swallow (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) in Alaska. Wasmann Journal of Biology 37: 59–63Google Scholar
Haas, G.E., Rumfelt, T., Wilson, N. 1980. Fleas (Siphonaptera) from nests and burrows of the bank swallow (Riparia riparia) in Alaska. Northwest Science 54: 210–5Google Scholar
Haas, G.E., Wilson, N., Rumfelt, T. 1985. Bird fleas, genus Ceratophyllus, from Alaska (Siphonaptera: Ceratophyllidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 61: 180–3Google Scholar
Haddow, J.F., Traub, R., Rothschild, M. 1983. Distribution of ceratophyllid fleas and notes on their hosts. Material in the collection, with additional notes and maps of the genera. pp. 42–163 + 151 maps in Traub, R., Rothschild, M., Haddow, J.F. (Eds.), The Rothschild Collection of Fleas. The Ceratophyllidae: key to the Genera and Host Relationships, with Notes on Their Evolution and Medical Importance. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Hinton, H.E. 1946. On the homology and nomenclature of the setae of lepidopterous larvae, with some notes on the phylogeny of the Lepidoptera. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society of London 97: 1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, G.P. 1949. The Siphonaptera of Canada. Canada Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 70.Google Scholar
Holland, G.P. 1985. The fleas of Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Siphonaptera). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 130Google Scholar
Hopla, C.E. 1965. Alaskan haematophagous insects, their feeding habits and potential as vectors of pathogenic organisms. I. The Siphonaptera of Alaska. Arctic Aeromedical Laboratory Technical Report 64–12Google Scholar
Hopla, C.E., Loye, J.E. 1983. The ectoparasites and microorganisms associated with cliff swallows in west-central Oklahoma. I. Ticks and fleas. Bulletin of the Society for Vector Ecology 8: 111–21Google Scholar
Hubbard, C.A. 1947. Fleas of Western North America: Their Relation to Public Health. Ames: Iowa State College PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karandina, R.S. 1964. Larvae of fleas of the red-tailed Libyan jird and some other rodents of Azerbaydzhan. Trudy Armyanskoi Protivochumnoy Stantsii 3: 473–504 [In Russian]Google Scholar
Kir'yakova, A.N. 1965. Larvae of fleas (Aphaniptera) of the family Ceratophyllidae. III. Entomological Review 44: 218–24 [Translation of Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie 44: 383–94]Google Scholar
Lewis, R.E. 1990. The Ceratophyllidae: Currently Accepted Valid Taxa (Insecta: Siphonaptera). Koenigstein: Koeltz Scientific BooksGoogle Scholar
Lewis, R.E., Lewis, J.H., Maser, C. 1988. The Fleas of the Pacific Northwest. Corvallis: Oregon State University PressGoogle Scholar
Moser, B.A., Koehler, P.G., Patterson, R.S. 1991. Separation of cat flea (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) instars by individual rearing and head width measurements. Journal of Economic Entomology 84: 922–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peus, F. 1938. Die Flöhe. Bau, Kennzeichen und Lebenweise, Hygienische Bedeutung und Bekämpfung der für den Menschen wichtigen Floh-Arten. Hygienische Zoologie 5: 1–106Google Scholar
Pilgrim, R.L.C. 1980. The New Zealand flea fauna. pp. 173–84 in Traub, R., Starcke, H. (Eds.), Fleas, Proceedings of the International Conference on Fleas, Ashton Wold, Peterborough, U.K. Rotterdam: A.A. BalkemaGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, R.L.C. 1988. Flea larvae — their morphology in relation to taxonomy, biology and phylogeny. pp. 107–16 in Symposium Proceedings, Results and Perspectives of Further Research of Siphonaptera in Palearct from the Aspect of Their Significance for Practice, 6–11 June 1988. Bratislava: Slovak Entomological Society, Slovak Academy of SciencesGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, R.L.C. 1991. External morphology of flea larvae (Siphonaptera) and its significance in taxonomy. Florida Entomologist 74: 386–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilgrim, R.L.C. 1992. Preparation and examination of flea larvae (Siphonaptera) by light and electron microscopy. Journal of Medical Entomology 29: 953–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pilgrim, R.L.C. 1998. Larvae of the genus Notiopsylla (Siphonaptera: Pygiopsyllidae) with a key to their identification. Journal of Medical Entomology 35: 362–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwan, T.G., Higgins, M.L., Nelson, B.C. 1983. Hectopsylla psittaci, a South American sticktight flea (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae), established in cliff swallow nests in California, United States. Journal of Medical Entomology 20: 690–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnova, G. 1950. Development and systematics of some genera of flea larvae (Aphaniptera). Unspecified thesis, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia [In Russian]Google Scholar
Smit, FGAM. 1979. The fleas of New Zealand (Siphonaptera). Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 9: 143–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smit, FGAM. 1983. Key to the genera and subgenera of Ceratophyllidae. pp. 1–36in Traub, R., Rothschild, M., Haddow, J.F. (Eds.), The Rothschild Collection of Fleas. The Ceratophyllidae: Key to the Genera and Host Relationships, with Notes on Their Evolution and Medical Importance. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Traub, R., Rothschild, M. 1983. Evolution of the Ceratophyllidae. pp. 188–201in Traub, R., Rothschild, M., Haddow, J.F. (Eds.), The Rothschild Collection of Fleas. The Ceratophyllidae: Key to the Genera and Host Relationships, with Notes on Their Evolution and Medical Importance. London: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Wang, D-c. 1956. Comparative morphology of some common flea larvae (Siphonaptera). Acta Entomologica Sinica 6: 311–21 [In Chinese]Google Scholar