Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T05:28:23.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Description of the larva of Telebasis digiticollis (Odonata: Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Rodolfo Novelo-Gutiérrez  and
José Antonio Gómez-Anaya
Rodolfo Novelo-Gutiérrez*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Departamento de Entomología, Apartado Postal 63, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, México
José Antonio Gómez-Anaya
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Departamento de Entomología, Apartado Postal 63, 91070 Xalapa, Veracruz, México
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A detailed description and illustrations of the larva of Telebasis digiticollis Calvert, 1902 are provided. A comparison with other larvae of the genus is made. Telebasis digiticollis is distinguished by 1 premental seta, 6–7 setae on the labial palp, a well-developed and convex ligula, 7–8 spiniform setae on the lateral margins of the prementum, and forceps-like male gonapophyses. The larva of T. digiticollis is more like that of T. boomsmae Garrison, 1994 than like other larvae of the genus. Larvae were found living in a lagoon densely covered by aquatic phanerogams such as Eichhornia sp. (Pontederiaceae) and Typha sp. (Typhaceae).

Résumé

Une déscription détaillée et illustrée des larves de Telebasis digiticollis Calvert, 1902 a été faite. Les principales caractéristiques des larves de T. digiticollis sont prémentum avec 1 soie, palpi avec 6–7 soies palpales, ligula très développé et convexe, marges latérales du prémentum avec une rangée de 7–8 soies épiniformes et la gonapophyse du mâle en forme de forceps. La larve de T. digiticollis est plus proche de celle de T. boomsmae Garrison, 1994 que des autres larves connue du genre. Elles ont été récoltées dan une lagune couverte par des phanérogames aquatiques tels que Eichhornia sp. (Pontederiaceae) et Typha sp. (Typhaceae).

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 137 , Issue 1 , February 2005 , pp. 61 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bick, G.H., and Bick, J.C. 1995. A review of the genus Telebasis with descriptions of eight new species (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica, 24(1): 11–44.Google Scholar
Bick, G.H., and Bick, J.C. 1996. Females of the genus Telebasis, with a description of T. bastiaani spec. nov. from Venezuela (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica, 25(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
Daigle, J.J. 2002 a. Telebasis gigantea spec. nov. from Bolivia (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica, 31(1): 73–76.Google Scholar
Daigle, J.J. 2002 b. Telebasis bickorum spec. nov. from Bolivia (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica, 31(2): 177–180.Google Scholar
Dunkle, S.W. 1990. Damselflies of Florida, Bermuda and the Bahamas. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
García-Díaz, J. 1938. An ecological survey of the fresh water insects of Puerto Rico. Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, 22(1): 43–97.Google Scholar
Garrison, R.W. 1994. Telebasis boomsmae spec. nov., a new damselfly from Belize (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica, 23(3): 277–282.Google Scholar
Garrison, R.W. 1997. Telebasis milleri spec. nov., a new damselfly from Peru, with comments on the status of T. fluviatilis St. Quentin (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica, 26(4): 467–472.Google Scholar
Geijskes, D.C. 1941. Notes on Odonata of Surinam. II. Six mostly new zygopterous nymphs from the coastland waters. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 34(4): 719–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geijskes, D.C. 1943. Notes on Odonata of Surinam. IV. Nine new or little known zygopterous nymphs from the inland waters. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 36(2): 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounibos, L.P., Escher, R.L., Dewald, L.B., Nishimura, N., and Larson, V.L. 1990. Odonata associated with water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes L.) in south Florida. Odonatologica, 19(4): 359–366.Google Scholar
Needham, J.G. 1904. New dragon-fly nymphs in the United States National Museum. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 27(1371): 685–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novelo-Gutiérrez, R., Gómez-Anaya, J.A., and Arce-Pérez, R. 2002. Community structure of Odonata larvae in two streams in Zimapán, Hidalgo, México. Odonatologica, 31(3): 273–286.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, R.E. 1954. The dragonfly larva. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 123(2): 1–38.Google Scholar
Tennessen, K.J. 2002. Telebasis simulata spec. nov. from South America, previously confused with T. sanguinalis Calvert (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica, 31(2): 205–207.Google Scholar
Westfall, M.J. 1957. A new species of Telebasis from Florida (Odonata: Zygoptera). The Florida Entomologist, 40(1): 19–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westfall, M.J., and May, M.L. 1996. Damselflies of North America. Scientific Publishers, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar