Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:39:31.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Description of mature larvae of the four species of the Pissodes strobi complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Daryl J.M. Williams*
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 – 122nd Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5
David W. Langor
Affiliation:
Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Northern Forestry Centre, 5320 – 122nd Street, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6H 3S5
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Mature larvae of Pissodes strobi (Peck), Pissodes schwarzi Hopkins, Pissodes nemorensis Germar, and Pissodes terminalis Hopping are described and external morphology illustrated. A key to species is presented. A phylogenetic analysis is done using single- and multiple-outgroup comparisons, which both find trees of identical topology. Character states of clypeus pigmentation and premental sclerite shape putatively support a monophyletic relationship of the P. strobi complex.

Résumé

On trouvera ici une description illustrée de la morphologie externe des larves à maturité de Pissodes strobi (Peck), Pissodes schwarzi Hopkins, Pissodes nemorensis Germar et Pissodes teminalis Hopping. Une clé d'identification permettra de distinguer les espèces. Une analyse phylogénétique a été faite, basée sur des comparaisons avec un ou plusieurs groupes externes, deux méthodes qui ont donné des arbres de topologies identiques. Les caractères de la pigmentation du clypéus et de la forme du sclérite du prémentum reflètent probablement une relation monophylétique au sein du complexe P. strobi.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, D.H. 1987. Curculionidae (broad sense) (Curculionoidea). pp 594612in Stehr, F.W. (Ed), Immature insects. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W.H. 1947. A terminology for the anatomical characters useful in the taxonomy of weevil larvae. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 49: 123–32Google Scholar
Böving, A.G. 1929. Taxonomic characters for the identification of the mature larvae of Pissodes strobi Peck and Pissodes approximatus Hopkins (Fam. Curculionidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington 31: 182–7Google Scholar
Boyce, T.M., Zwick, M.E., Aquadro, C.F. 1994. Mitochondrial DNA in the bark weevils: phylogeny and evolution in the Pissodes strobi species group (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Molecular Biology and Evolution 11(2): 183–94Google Scholar
Finnegan, R.J. 1958. The pine weevil, Pissodes approximatus Hopk., in southern Ontario. The Canadian Entomologist 90: 348–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germar, E.F. 1824. Insectomm species novae aut minus cognitae, descriptionibus illustratae. J.C. Hendellil et filii, Halae XXIVGoogle Scholar
Godwin, P.A., Odell, T.M. 1967. Experimental hybridization of Pissodes strobi and Pissodes approximatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 60(1): 55–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiratsuka, Y., Langor, D.W., Crane, P.E. 1995. A field guide to forest insects and diseases of the prairie provinces. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Special Report 3Google Scholar
Hopkins, A.D. 1911. I. Contributions toward a monograph of the bark-weevils of the genus Pissodes. United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Entomology, Technical Papers on Miscellaneous Forest Insects, Technical Series 20Google Scholar
Hopping, R. 1920. A new species of the genus Pissodes (Coleoptera). The Canadian Entomologist 52: 132–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanags, E. 1935. Zur kenntnis der lamen der Pissodes arten Finnlands. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 20(3): 123Google Scholar
Langor, D.W. 1998 An annotated bibliography of North and Central American species of bark weevils, Pissodes (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Information Report NOR.x.355Google Scholar
Langor, D.W., Sperling, F.A.H. 1995. Mitochondrial DNA variation and identification of bark weevils in the Pissodes strobi species group in western Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 127: 895911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langor, D.W., Sperling, F.A.H. 1997. Mitochondrial DNA sequence divergence in weevils of the Pissode strobi species complex (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Insect Molecular Biology 6: 255–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langor, D.W., Williams, D.J.M. 1998. Life cycle and mortality of Pissodes terminalis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in lodgepole pine. The Canadian Entomologist 130: 387–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langor, D.W., Drouin, J.A., Wong, H.R. 1992. The lodgepole terminal weevil in the prairie provinces. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Forest Management Note 55Google Scholar
Lee, C-Y. 1992. Comparative morphology of the weevil larvae of the superfamily Curculionoidea in Korea (Coleoptera). Korean Journal of Applied Entomology 31(2): 153–69Google Scholar
Lee, C-Y, Morimoto, K. 1989. A terminology for the taxonomy of weevil larvae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Annual Report, Institute of Forest Science, Kangweon National University 5: 2944Google Scholar
MacAloney, H.J. 1930. The white pine weevil – its biology and control. New York State University, College of Forestry, Syracuse, New York, Technical Publication 28Google Scholar
Marvaldi, A.E. 1999. Morphologia larval en Curculionidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Acta zoologica illoana 45(1): 724Google Scholar
May, B.M. 1994. An introduction to the immature stages of Australian Curculionoidea pp 366755in Zimmerman, E.C. (Ed), Australian weevils volume II. Melbourne: Brown Prior AndersonGoogle Scholar
O'Brien, L.B. 1989. A catalogue of the Coleoptera of America north of Mexico, family: Curculionidae, subfamily: Pissodinae. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, Agricultural Handbook 529–143dGoogle Scholar
Ollieu, M.M. 1971. Damage to southern pines by Pissodes nemorensis. Journal of Economic Entomology 64(6): 1456–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overgaard, N.A., Nachod, L.H. 1971. Deodar weevil causes pine mortality in Louisiana. Journal of Economic Entomology 64(5): 1329–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, W.D. 1817. On the insects which destroy the young branches of the pear-tree, and the leading shoots of the Weymouth-Pine. Massachusetts Agricultural Journal 4: 205–11Google Scholar
Peterson, A. 1951. Larvae of insects. An introduction to Nearctic species. Part II. Coleoptera, Diptera, Neuroptera, Siphonaptera, Mecoptera, Trichoptera. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Edwards Brothers IncGoogle Scholar
Plummer, C.C., Pilsbury, A.E. 1929. The white pine weevil in New Hampshire. New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 247Google Scholar
Scherf, H. 1964. Die Entwuckslungsstadien der Mitteleuropäischen Curculioniden (morphologie, bionomie, ökologie). Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen Natuflorschenden Gesellschaft 506Google Scholar
Smith, S.G. 1973. Karyotype analysis of Pissodes weevils: evidence for two additional putative taxa. Canadian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 15: 215–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.G., Sugden, B.A. 1969. Host trees and breeding sites of native North American Pissodes bark weevils, with a note on synonymy. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 62: 146–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.G., Takenouchi, Y. 1962. Unique incompatibiity system in a hybrid species. Science (Washington, DC) 138: 36–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R.W., Wood, D.L. 1964. The biology of Pissodes terminalis Hopping (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in California. The Canadian Entomologist 96: 1208–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehr, F.W. (Editor). 1987. Techniques for collecting, rearing, preserving, and studying immature insects, pp 717in Immature insects. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall Hunt Publishing CoGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R.E. 1966. Observations on the Yosemite bark weevil in California (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Pan-Pacific Entomologist 42(3): 184–9Google Scholar
Swofford, D.L. 1999 PAUP 4.0. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J.B. 1957. The use of larval anatomy in the study of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). The Canadian Entomologist Supplement VGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J.B. 1964. A key to larvae and pupae of three weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). The Canadian Entomologist 96: 1417–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar