Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:56:10.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DAILY ACTIVITY PATTERNS AND SEX PHEROMONE SPECIFICITY AS SEXUAL ISOLATING MECHANISMS IN TWO SPECIES OF CHORISTONEURA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

C. J. Sanders
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The roles of adult activity patterns and sex pheromones were investigated in the sexual isolation of Choristoneura fumiferana and C. pinus, species which hybridize in cages but not in the field. Female C. fumiferana started calling (extruding the sex pheromone gland) earlier (50% of the females started calling by sunset) than female C. pinus (50% by 11/2 hours after sunset). Male C. fumiferana were also attracted to traps by the females earlier, although the times of the peak catches were approximately the same in both species. Males, both in the laboratory and the field, responded only to the sex pheromone of their own species. It is therefore concluded that while C. pinus adults normally appear about 2 weeks later than those of C. fumiferana, which reduces the possibility of hybridization, when the adults do overlap, the ultimate barrier is the specificity of the sex pheromones.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

References

Freeman, T. N. 1953. The spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), and an allied new species on pine. (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 85: 121127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, T. N. 1967. On coniferophagous species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in North America. I: Some new forms of Choristoneura allied to C. fumiferana. Can. Ent. 99: 449455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roelofs, W. L. and Comeau, A.. 1969. Sex pheromone specificity: Taxonomic and evolutionary aspects in Lepidoptera. Science 165: 398400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sanders, C. J. 1969. Extrusion of the female sex pheromone gland in the eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 101: 760762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, C. J. Laboratory bioassay of the sex pheromone of the female eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. (In press.)Google Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1953. Reproductive isolation and the integrity of two sympatric species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 85: 141151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1954. A partial breakdown of temporal and ecological isolation between Choristoneura species (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Evolution 8: 206224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stehr, G. 1967. On coniferophagous species of Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in North America. II: Geographic distribution in accordance with forest regions. Can. Ent. 99: 456463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar