Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T11:44:01.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE STUDY OF THE WORLD MACROPSINI (RHYNCHOTA: HOMOPTERA: CICADELLIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

K. G. A. Hamilton
K. G. A. Hamilton
Affiliation:
Biosystematics Research Institute, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa K1A 0C6
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The generic classification of the Macropsini is reviewed, and five new genera and four new subgenera are erected: Macropsella n. gen., Macropsis (Neomacropsis) n. subgen, M. (Parapediopsis) n. subgen., Pedionis n. gen., P. (Thyia) n. subgen., Pediopsoides (Celopsis) n. subgen.; Reticopsis n. gen., Toropsis n. gen., and Varicopsella n. gen.. The following genus-group names are considered to be subgenera: Macropsidius Ribaut as a subgenus of Macropsis Lewis; Nanopsis Freytag, Kiamoncopsis Linnavuori and Sispocnis Anufriev as subgenera of Pediopsoides Matsumura; Parasitades Singh-Pruthi as a subgenus of Oncopsis Burmeister. Asmaropsis Linnavuori is synonymized with Hephathus Ribaut, Tsavopsis Linnavuori is synonymized with Macropsis (s.s.) Lewis, and Zinneca Amyot & Serville is synonymized with Oncopsis Burm. (s.s.).

Three hundred and seventy-three macropsine species (including 59 unnamed species) are placed generically, with 73 new combinations. Twelve new species are described: Macropsella complicata (New Guinea), Macropsis citronella (Australia), M. gagnei (New Guinea), M. gressitti (New Guinea), Oncopsis enopis (Nepal), O. nepalensis (Nepal), O. tortosa (Nepal), Pedionis astrala (Philippines), P. contrasta (Hong Kong), P. venosa (Japan), Pediopsis femorata (Formosa), Varicopsella obtusa (Borneo). An index is provided to the 436 available names in the Macropsini, including four unplaced species from the Ethiopian region and 21 from the Australian region.

Macropsine types in the B.P. Bishop Museum, Honolulu, the British Museum (Natural History), London, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan, and the U.S. National Museum, Washington are illustrated and lectotypes are designated for Kirkaldy and Matsumura species. A neotype in the Canadian National Collection is designated for Zinneca flavidorsum Amyot & Serville.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 112 , Issue 9 , 01 September 1980 , pp. 875 - 932
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amyot, C.-J.-B. and Serville, A.. 1843. Histoire Naturelle des Insectes. Hémiptères. 675 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anufriev, G. A. 1967. Notes on the genus Oncopsis Burmeister, 1838 (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha) with descriptions of new species from the Soviet Far East. Ent. Tidskr. 88(3–4): 174–184.Google Scholar
Anufriev, G. A. 1971. Six new far eastern species of leafhoppers (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha). Bull. Acad. pol. Sci. Cl. II Sér. Sci. biol. 19(78): 517–522.Google Scholar
Anufriev, G. A. 1976. Notes on the genus Psammotettix Hpt. with descriptions of two new species from Siberia and the far east (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Reichenbachia 16(9): 129–134.Google Scholar
Anufriev, G. A. 1977. Leafhoppers (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadellidae) of the Kurile Islands [in Russian]. Trans. zool. Inst. Leningrad 70: 10–36.Google Scholar
Baker, C. F. 1898. Some new Bythoscopinae with notes on others. Psyche, Camb. 8: 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, E. D. 1902. Some new Bythoscopidae from British Columbia and the southwest. Can. Ent. 34: 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beirne, B. P. 1951. The Nearctic species of Oncopsis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Can. Ent. 83: 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1845. Nya Svenska Homoptera. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. 1845: 21–63, 154–164.Google Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1847. Nya Svenska Homoptera. Öfvers. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Förh. 1847: 263–266.Google Scholar
Boheman, C. H. 1852. Entomologiska antechningar under en resa i sodra sverige 1851. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. 1851: 53–211.Google Scholar
Breakey, E. P. 1932. A review of the Nearctic species of Macropsis (Homoptera, Cicadellidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 25(4): 787–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burmeister, H. C. C. 1838. Genera Insectorum Iconibus Illustravit et Descripsit, Rhynchota. 48 pp.Google Scholar
China, W. E. 1925. The Ethiopian species of Macropsis Lewis (Pediopsis Auct.) (Homopt., Bythoscopidae). Eos 1: 361–374.Google Scholar
Cogan, E. S. 1916. Homopterous studies, part 1. Contribution towards our knowledge of the Homoptera of South Africa. Ohio J. Sci. 16: 161–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, J. 1837. Iassus. British Entomology, 14: 636.Google Scholar
DeLong, D. M. 1923. Family Cicadellidae. In Britton's Guide to the Insects of Connecticut, part 4. Bull. Ct. St. Geol. nat. Hist. Surv. 34: 56–163.Google Scholar
DeLong, D. M. and Caldwell, J. S.. 1937. Some new species of Idiocerus (Homoptera-Cicadellidae). Ohio J. Sci. 37: 161–164.Google Scholar
de Motschulsky, V. I. 1859. Homoptères. Etud. ent. 8: 25–118.Google Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1909. “Sealark” Rhynchota. Trans. Linn. Soc. Lond., Zool. 13(2): 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Distant, W. L. 1916. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Rhynchota, Vol. VI, Homoptera: appendix. 248 pp.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1957. Die Zikaden Afghanistans (Homopt.-Auchenorrhyncha) nach den Ergbnissen der von Herrn J. Klapperich in den Jahren 1952–1953 nach Afghanistan unternommenen Expedition. Mitt. münch. ent. Ges. 47: 265–303.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1958. Zikaden-ausbeute vom Kaukasus (Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha). Sb. ent. Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 32(509): 317–352.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1961. Die Zikaden von Zentralasien, Dagestan und Transkaukasien (Homopt. Auchenorrhyncha). Sb. ent Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 34 (587): 241–356.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1963 a. Weitere neue Arten der Familie Cicadellidae aus Zentralasien und zoogeographische Bemerkungen zu einzelnen paläarktischen Zikadenarten (Homoptera). Sb. ent. Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 35: 381–390.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1963 b. A revision of the leafhopper genus Macropsidius Rib. (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha). Acta ent. bohemoslov. 60(1–2): 114–124.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1964. Ergebnisse der Zoologischen Nubien-Expedition 1962, Teil XXVI, Homoptera Auchenorrhyncha. Annln naturh. Mus. Wien 67: 615–626.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1965. Ergebnisse der zoologischen Forschungen von Dr. Z. Kaszab in der Mongolei. 54. Homoptera-Auchenorrhyncha. Acta faun. ent. Nat. Pragae 11: 79–136.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1967 a. Ergebnisse der 1. mongolischtschechoslovakischen entomologisch-botanischen Expedition in der Mongolei, Nr. 1. Acta faun. ent. Nat. Pragae 12: 1–34.Google Scholar
Dlabola, J. 1967 b. Beschreibungen von neuen südpaläarktischen Zikadenarten (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha). Sb. ent. Odd. nár. Mus. Praze 37: 31–50.Google Scholar
Dubovsky, G. K. 1966. Cicadina (Auchenorrhyncha) of the Fergana Valley [in Russian]. Izdat. “FAN” Uzbek. SSR, Taškent. 256 pp.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. 1919. A note on the British representatives of the genus Macropsis Lewis, with descriptions of two new species. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 55: 55–58.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. 1920. New or little known species of British Cicadina. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 56: 53–58.Google Scholar
Emel'yanov, A. F. 1964 a. New Cicadina from Kazakhstan (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha) [in Russian]. Trudy zool. Inst., Leningr. 34: 3–51.Google Scholar
Emel'yanov, A. F. 1964 b. A new species of Macropsis (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) found on oleaster (Elaeagnus) [in Russian]. Dokl. Akad. Nauk tadzh. SSR 7(1): 47–48.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1934. A revision of the Ipoinae (Homoptera, Eurymelidae). Trans. R. Soc. S. Aust. 58: 149–167.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1935. The Bythoscopidae of Australia (Homoptera, Jassoidea). Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 1935: 61–83.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1941 a. New leaf-hoppers (Homoptera, Jassoidea) from Western Australia. J. Proc. R. Soc. West. Aust. 27: 143–163.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1941 b. New Australian leafhoppers. Trans. R. Soc. sth. Aust. 65: 36–41.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1942. New leafhoppers from Tasmania and Queensland. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 1941: 27–30.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1953. Les Cicadellidae de Madagascar (Homoptères). Mem. Inst. Sci. Madagascar (E) 4: 87–137.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1955 a. Cicadellidae (Hemiptera, Homoptera). Expl. Parc natn. Upemba 37: 1–44.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1955 b. Cicadellidae (Hemiptera, Homoptera). Expl. Parc natn. Albert 84: 1–23.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1966. The leafhoppers and froghoppers of Australia and New Zealand (Homoptera: Cicadelloidea and Cercopoidea). Mem. Aust. Mus. 12. 347 pp.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1971. Leafhoppers from New Guinea and Australia belonging to the subfamilies Macropsinae and Agalliinae with notes on the position of Nionia Ball and Magnentius Pruthi (Homoptera: Cicadelloidea). Pacif. Insects 13(2): 343–360.Google Scholar
Evans, J. W. 1974. New Caledonian leafhoppers and the systematic position of Kosmiopelix Kirkaldy and Euacanthella Evans (Homoptera: Cicadelloidea). Pacif. Insects 16(2–3): 165–175.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1775. Ryngota. Systema Entomologiae. 816 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1794. Ryngota. Entomologica Systematica Emandata et Aucta, 4. 472 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J. C. 1798. Ryngota. Entomologiae Systematicae Supplementum. 572 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallén, C. F. 1806. Fòrsòk till de Svenska Cicad-Artemas uppstàllning och beskrifning. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. 27: 6–43, 113–130.Google Scholar
Fieber, F. X. 1868. Europäische neue oder wenig bekannte Bythoscopidae. Verh. Zool.-bot. Gesell. Wien 18: 449–464.Google Scholar
Fitch, A. 1851. Catalogue with references and descriptions of the insects collected and arranged for the state Cabinet of Natural History. St. N.Y. A. Rep. 4: 43–69.Google Scholar
Flor, G. 1861. Die Rhynchoten Livlands in systematischer Folge beschrieben, Zweiter Theil. Arch. Naturk. Liv-Est-u. Kurlands 4(2). 567 pp.Google Scholar
Freytag, P. H. 1974. A new genus of leafhoppers — Nanopsis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 67(4): 605–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Germar, E. F. 1831. Cercopis mactata Germ., Tettigonia concinna Germ. … Agusti Ahrensii Fauna Insectorum Europae, 14: 11–15.Google Scholar
Germar, E. F. 1837. Agusti Ahrensii Fauna Insectorum Europae 17: 10–20.Google Scholar
Gillette, C. P. and Baker, C. F.. 1895. A preliminary list of the Hemiptera of Colorado. Bull. Colo. agric. Exp. Stn 31. 137 pp.Google Scholar
Gmelin, J. F. 1789. Insecta Hemiptera. Caroli a Linné Systema Naturae 1(4): 1517–2224.Google Scholar
Gravenhorst, J. L. C. 1807. Vergleichende Uebersicht des Linneischen und einiger neuern zoologischen Systeme. 476 pp.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K. G. A. 1972. The Manitoban fauna of leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), I. Can. Ent. 104(6): 825–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrich-Schäffer, G. A. W. 1835. Nomenclator entomologicus. Verzeichniss der europaischen Insecten: zur Erleichterung des Tauschverkehrs mit Preisen versehen. 1, Homoptera. 116 pp.Google Scholar
Herrich-Schäffer, G. A. W. 1836. Deutschlands Insecten 143. 22 pp.Google Scholar
Horváth, G. 1897. Homoptera nova ex Hungaria. Természetr. Füz. 20: 620–643.Google Scholar
Horváth, G. 1899. Hémiptères de l'île de Yesso (Japon). Természetr. Füz. 22: 365–374.Google Scholar
Horváth, G. 1904. Insecta Heptapotamica a DD. Almásy et Stummer-Traunfels collecta, I. Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 2: 574–590.Google Scholar
Horváth, G. 1905. Descripciones de algunos Hemipteros nuevos del centro de España. Boll. Soc. españ. Hist. nat. 5: 272–277.Google Scholar
I.C.Z.N. 1961. Opinion 603. Macropsis Lewis 1834 (Insecta, Hemiptera); designation of a type-species under the plenary powers. Bull. zool. Nom. 18: 249–251.Google Scholar
Ishihara, T. 1953. In Ishihara, Hisamatsu, Edashige & Sasaki, The insect fauna of Mt. Ishizuchi and Omogo Valley, Iyo, Japan. Trans. Shikoku ent. Soc. Suppl. 3. 137 pp.Google Scholar
Jacobi, A. 1910. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Swedischen Zoologischen Expedition nach dem Kilimandjaro, dem Meru und den Umgebenden Massaisteppen Deutsch-Ostafrikas 1905–1906. Schwedischen Akad. Wiss. 1910: 97–136.Google Scholar
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1903. On the nomenclature of the genera of the Rhynchota; Heteroptera, and Auchenorrhynchous Homoptera. Entomologist 36: 213–216, 230–233.Google Scholar
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1907. Leafhoppers supplement (Hemiptera). Bull. Hawaiian Sug. Plrs' Ass. Exp. Stn. 3: 1–20.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, C. L. 1868. Die Cicadinen der gegend von Wiesbaden und Frankfurt A.M. nebst einer anzahl neuer oder Schwer zu unterscheidender Arten aus anderen Gegenden Europa's Tabellarisch Beschrieben. Jb. nassau Ver. Naturk. 21–22. 202 pp.Google Scholar
Knull, D. M. J. 1940. Two new Macropsis from Texas (Homoptera: Cicadellidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 33: 371–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knull, D. M. J. 1944. Nomenclatorial notes on Cicadellidae. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 37: 123.Google Scholar
Korolevskaja, A. L. L. 1963. New species from the genus Macropsis (Auchenorrhyncha, Cicadellidae) from Tadzhikistan [in Russian]. Dokl. Akad. Nauk tadzh. SSR 6(7): 40–43.Google Scholar
Korolevskaja, A. L. L. 1968. Data on the study of the dendrophilous Cicadina fauna on the southern slopes of the Gussar Mountains [in Russian]. In Narzikulov, M. N. (Ed.), The Gorge of Kondara, 2: 100–117.Google Scholar
Kupka, P. L. B. 1925. Fränkische Cicadinen. Mitt. Munch. ent. Ges. 15: 102–113.Google Scholar
Kusnezov, V. 1929. Beitrag zur Kenntnis der transbaikalischen Homopteren Fauna. Wien ent. Ztg 46: 157–185.Google Scholar
Lallemand, V. 1935. Homoptera. Ann. Mus. Genova 58: 79–84.Google Scholar
Lauterer, P. and Anufriev, G. A.. 1969. Contribution to the knowledge of the genus Oncopsis Burm. (Homoptera, Cicadellidae) from China and Far East. Cas. morav. Mus. 54: 161–168.Google Scholar
Lethierry, L. F. 1876. Homoptères nouveaux d'Europe et des contrées voisines. Annls Soc. ent. Belg. 19: 76–88.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. H. 1834. Descriptions of some new genera of British Homoptera. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 1: 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindberg, H. 1926. Zur Kenntnis der Paläarktischen Cicadina, III. Notul. ent. 6: 18–21.Google Scholar
Lindberg, H. 1953. Hemiptera Insularum Canariensium. Commentat. biol. 14(1). 304 pp.Google Scholar
Lindberg, H. 1958. Hemiptera Insularum Caboverdensium. Commentat. biol. 19. 246 pp.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. 1761. Fauna Suecica sistens animalia Sueciae regni … 578 pp.Google Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1952. Havaintoja etela — ja pohjois — Savon nivelkarsaiselaimistosta. Suom. hyönt. Aikak 18: 64–75.Google Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1953. Contributions to the Hemipterous fauna of Palestine, II. Suom. hyönt. Aikak 19: 119–124.Google Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1954. On some little known Macropsis species (Hom. Cicadellidae). Suom. hyönt. Aikak 20: 80–82.Google Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1969. Contribution à la faune du Congo (Brazzaville). Mission A. Villiers et A. Descarpentries XCIII. Hémiptères Hylicidae et Cicadellidae. Bull. Inst. fondam Afr. noire (A) 31: 1129–1185.Google Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1971. A leafhopper material from Tunisia, with remarks on some species of the adjacent countries. Annls Soc. ent. Fr. (s.n.) 7(1): 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linnavuori, R. 1978. Studies on the family Cicadellidae (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha), 1. A revision of the Macropsinae of the Ethiopian Region. Acta ent. fenn. 33: 1–17.Google Scholar
Logvinenko, V. M. 1965. New forms of leafhoppers from the Crimea [in Russian]. Dopov. Akad. Nauk ukr. RSR 11: 1526–1530.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. 1911. Erster Beitrag zur Insekten-Fauna von Sachalin. J. Sapporo agric. Coll. 4(3). 145 pp.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. 1912. Die Acocephalinen und Bythoscopinen Japans. J. Sapporo agric. Coll. 4(7): 279–325.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. 1915. Neue Cicadinen Koreas. Trans. Sapporo nat. Hist. Soc. 5: 154–184.Google Scholar
Matsumura, S. 1920. Manual of Japanese injurious insects, ed. 2 [in Japanese]. 857 pp.Google Scholar
Melichar, L. 1902. Homopteren aus West China, Persien, und dem Süd-Ussuri-Gebiete. Ezheg. zool. Muz. 7: 76–146.Google Scholar
Melichar, L. 1911. Collections recueillies par M. M. de Rothschild dans l'Afrique Orientale. Bull. Mus. Hist. nat., Paris 1911: 106–117.Google Scholar
Melichar, L. 1914. Homopteren von Java, gesammelt von Herrn. Ewd. Jacobson. Leyden Mus. Notes 36: 91–147.Google Scholar
Merino, G. 1936. Philippine Cicadellidae (Homoptera). Philipp. J. Sci. 61: 307–400.Google Scholar
Metcalf, Z. P. 1966. General Catalogue of the Homoptera. Fasc. VI, Cicadelloidea; part 13, Macropsidae. 259 pp.Google Scholar
Mitjaev, I. D. 1967. New and little known species of Cicadina (Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha) from East Kazakhstan [in Russian]. Ént. Obozr. 46(3): 712–723.Google Scholar
Mitjaev, I. D. 1971. Leafhoppers of Kazakhstan (Homoptera-Cicadinea) [in Russian]. Academy of Sciences of the Kazakh SSR. 211 pp.Google Scholar
Nast, J. 1972. Palearctic Auchenorrhyncha (Homoptera), an annotated check list. Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw. 550 pp.Google Scholar
Oman, P. W. 1938. A generic revision of American Bythoscopinae and South American Jassinae. Kans. Univ. Sci. Bull. 24: 343–420.Google Scholar
Oman, P. W. 1949. The Nearctic leafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), a generic classification and check list. Mem. ent. Soc. Wash. 3: 1–253.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. 1915. Leafhoppers of Maine. Bull. Me agric. Exp. Stn 238: 81–159.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. 1928. The leafhoppers of Ohio (Cicadellidae). Bull. Ohio biol. Surv. 3: 199–374.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. 1932. Supplemental records and notes on Ohio leafhoppers. Ohio J. Sci. 32: 513–517.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. 1935. Cicadellidae of Hawaii. Bull. B.P. Bishop Mus. 134. 62 pp.Google Scholar
Osborn, H. and Ball, E. D.. 1898. The genus Pediopsis. Proc. Davenport Acad. nat. Sci. 7: 111–123.Google Scholar
Ossiannilsson, F. 1938. Revision von Zetterstedts Lappländischen Homopteren, I. Opusc. ent. 3: 65–79.Google Scholar
Prohaska, K. 1923. Hemiptera, Homoptera. Zikaden, Zirpen. In Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Hemipteren Kärntens. Carinthia 112–113: 32–101.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1872. Description de plusieurs Hémiptères nouveaux. Naturaliste can. 4: 350–352, 376–379.Google Scholar
Provancher, L. 1890. Petite faune entomologique du Canada, et particulièrement de la Province de Québec. III, cinquième ordre, les Hémiptères. 355 pp.Google Scholar
Rao, P. K. and Ramakrishnan, U.. 1979. Two new species of Macropsis (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Macropsinae) from northern India. Orient. Insects 13(3–4): 307–310.Google Scholar
Reuter, O. M. 1885. Sibiriska Hemiptera. Öfvers. finska VetenskAkad. Förh. 26: 22–35.Google Scholar
Rey, C. 1891. Observations sur quelques Hémiptères-Homoptères et descriptions d'espèces nouvelles ou peu connues. Revue Ent. 10: 240–256.Google Scholar
Rey, C. 1894. Remarques en passant. Échange 10: 29–30.Google Scholar
Ribaut, H. 1952. Homoptères Auchénorhynques. II (Jassidae). Faune Fr. 57: 1–474.Google Scholar
Ribaut, H. 1959. Nouvelles espèces françaises d'Homoptères. Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Toulouse 94(3–4): 400–405.Google Scholar
Sahlberg, J. R. 1871. Ofversigt af Finlands och den Skandinaviska halfons Cicadariae, I. Notis Sällsk. Fauna Flora Förh. 9(12). 506 pp.Google Scholar
Schrank, F. P. 1776. Beyträge zur Naturgeschichte. 137 pp.Google Scholar
Schrank, F. P. 1801. Fauna Boica 2(1). 374 pp.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1873. On certain British Hemiptera-Homoptera. Revision of the Bythoscopidae, and descriptions of some species not hitherto recorded as British. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 10: 22–29, 80–82, 125–131.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 1874. On certain British Hemiptera-Homoptera. Revision of the Bythoscopidae, and descriptions of some species not hitherto recorded as British. Entomologist's mon. Mag. 10: 189–195, 235–242.Google Scholar
Singh-Pruthi, H. 1936. Studies on Indian Jassidae (Homoptera). Part III. Descriptions of some new genera and species, with first records of some known species from India. Mem. Indian Mus. 11: 101–131.Google Scholar
Spinola, M. 1852. Tribu IV. Hipocefalocera. pp. 238–305in Gay, C., Historia Fisica y Politica de Chile, 7.Google Scholar
Stål, C. 1858. Orthoptera och Hemiptera från södra Áfrika. Ofvers. K. svenska VetenskAkad. Förh. 15: 307–320.Google Scholar
Strobl, G. 1900. Steirische Hemipteren. Mitt. naturw. Ver. Steierm 36: 170–224.Google Scholar
Thomson, C. G. 1870. Öfversigt af de i Sverige funna arter af släftet Pediopsis Burm. Opusc ent. 3: 316–321.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1889 a. Review of the North American species of Pediopsis. Entomologica am. 5: 165–174.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1889 b. On a new species of Pediopsis. Psyche, Camb. 5: 238–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1890 a. New California Homoptera. Entomologica am. 6: 35–38.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1890 b. Review of the North American species of Bythoscopus. Entomologica am. 6: 221–229.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1890 c. New North American Homoptera. Can. Ent. 22: 110–112, 249–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1894. New North American Homoptera — No. VII. Can. Ent. 26: 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1907. Notes on Jamaican Hemiptera. Bull. Buffalo Soc. nat. Sci. 8(5): 3–79.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1916. Check List of Hemiptera (excepting the Aphididae, Aleurodidae, and Coccidae) of America north of Mexico. 111 pp.Google Scholar
Van Duzee, E. P. 1917. Catalogue of the Hemiptera of America north of Mexico excepting the Aphididae, Coccidae and Aleurodidae. Tech. Bull. Calif. agric. Exp. Stn ent. 2. 902 pp.Google Scholar
Vilbaste, J. 1965. Uber die Zikadenfauna Altais [in Russian]. Institute of Zoology and Botany, Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tartu. 143 pp.Google Scholar
Vilbaste, J. 1966. Neue Zikadenarten aus dem Primorje-Gebiet [in Russian]. Eesti NSV Tead. Akad. Toim., biol. Seer. 15(1): 61–71.Google Scholar
Vilbaste, J. 1968. Uber die Zikadenfauna des Primorje-Gebietes [in Russian]. Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR. 195 pp.Google Scholar
Viraktamath, C. A. 1980. Indian Macropsinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), I. New Species of Macropsis from South India. J. nat. Hist. 14: 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Viraktamath, C. A. [in press]. Indian Macropsinae (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), II. Species described by W. L. Distant and descriptions of new species from the Indian subcontinent.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1941. Die Zikaden der Provinz Pommern. Dohrniana 20: 95–184.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1944. Bombus 26/29: 128–131.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1950. Die Salicicolen Macropsis-Arten Nord und Mitteleuropas. Notul. ent. 30: 81–114.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1953. Eine neue Macropsis-Art (Hem. Hom.) aus den Niederlanden. Ent. Ber., Amst. 14: 232–234.Google Scholar
Wagner, W. 1964. Die auf Rosaceen lebenden Macropsis-Arten der Niederlande. Ent. Ber., Amst. 24: 123–136.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1851. List of the Specimens of Homopterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum, 3: 637–907.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1858. List of the Specimens of Homopterous Insects in the Collection of the British Museum, supplement. 307 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, F. 1870. A list of insects collected by J. K. Lord, Esq., in Egypt, along the African shore of the Red Sea and in Arabia; with descriptions of the species new to science. Zoologist 5(2): 2403–2405.Google Scholar
Westwood, J. O. 1840. An introduction to the modern classification of insects. 2, Synopsis of the genera of British Insects. 158 pp.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J. W. 1828. Fauna Insectorum Lapponica, 1. 563 pp.Google Scholar
Zetterstedt, J. W. 1840. Insecta Lapponica, 1. 314 pp.Google Scholar