Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:03:05.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF THURICIDE 16B® AND DIPEL 88® AGAINST THE SPRUCE BUDWORM, CHORISTONEURA FUMIFERANA (LEPIDOPTERA: TORTRICIDAE) IN BALSAM FIR STANDS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

O. N. Morris
Affiliation:
Forest Pest Management Institute, Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6A 5M7
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effectiveness of Thuricide 16B®, a water-based commercial formulation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. torstaki (B.t.), Dipel 88®, an oil-based formulation, and the Dipel® vehicle (Dipel 88 without B.t.) were compared by aerial applications against the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) in balsam fir, Abies balsamea (L.) stands. The two B.t. products applied at similar dosage rates were similar in effectiveness and the Dipel vehicle was not toxic for budworm larvae at rates applied Comparisons of populations of parasites made between pre- and post-spray sampling periods and between treated and untreated plots indicated no direct effect of Dipel 88 on the rate of larval and pupal parasitism.

Résumé

L'efficacité du Thuricide 16B®, préparation commerciale aqueuse de Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (B.t.). du Dipel 88®, préparation huileuse, et du véhicule Dipel® (Dipel 88 sans B.t.), en épandages aériens, contre les attaques de la tordeuse des bourgeons de l'épinette, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.), dans les peuplements de sapin banmier, Abies balsamea (L.), a été comparée. Aux mêmes doses, les deux produits renfermant B.t. se sont montrés tout aussi efficaces, et aux doses employées le Dipel n était pas toxique pour la tordeuse. Les comparaisons effectuées entre les populations de parasites avant et après les arrosages et entre les parcelles traitées et non traitées n ont révélé aucun effet direct du Dipel 88 sur le taux de parasitisme des larves et des chrysalides.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1983

References

Buckner, C. H., Kingsbury, P. D., McLeod, B. B., Mortensen, K. L., and Ray, D. G. H.. 1974. Evaluation of commercial preparations of Bacillus thuringiensis with and without chitinase against spruce budworm in DeBoo, R. F. and Morris, O. N. (Eds.). Can. For. Serv. Rep. CC-X-59, F1–F72.Google Scholar
Dimond, J. B. 1974. Tests of Bacillus thuringiensis against the spruce budworm in Maine, 1973. Maine agric. Exp. Stn Misc. Rep. 153. 23 pp.Google Scholar
Dimond, J. B., Spies, C. J. III, and O'Neil, J.. 1981. Spruce budworm: evaluation of B.t. trials in Maine, 1980. Maine Life Sci. and agric. Exp. Stn Misc. Rep. 237. 13 pp.Google Scholar
Fettes, J. J. 1950. Investigations of sampling techniques for population studies of the spruce budworm on balsam fir in Ontario. For. Insect. Lab., Sault Ste. Marie, Ann. Tech. Rep. 4. pp. 163401.Google Scholar
Grisdale, D. 1970. An improved laboratory method for rearing large numbers of spruce budworm, C. fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 102: 11111117.Google Scholar
Hamel, D. R. 1977. The effects of Bacillus thuringiensis on parasitoids of the western spruce budworm, Choristoneura occidentalis (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), and the spruce coneworm, Dioryctria reniculelloides (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in Montana. Can. Ent. 109: 14091415.Google Scholar
Johnstone, D. R. 1978. The influence of physical and meteorological factors on the deposition and drift of spray droplets of controlled size, in Controlled drop application. Proc. Symp., British Crop Protection Council Monograph No. 22. B.C.P.C. Publ., pp. 4357.Google Scholar
Lomas, J., Frankel, H. and Hirsch, I.. 1964. Meteorological conditions in determining the permissible time for cotton spraying from the air in Israel. Agric. Meteorol. 1: 225234.Google Scholar
Maksymiuk, B. 1963. Spray deposits on oil sensitive cards and spruce budworm mortality. J. econ. Ent. 56: 465467.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1977. Long term study of the effectiveness of aerial application of Bacillus thuringiensis – acephate combinations against the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can. Ent. 109: 12391248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1980. Report of the 1979 CANUSA cooperative Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) trials. Can. For. Serv. Rep. FPM-X-40. 75 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1981. Report of the 1980 cooperative Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) spray trials. Can. For. Serv. Rep. FPM-X-48. 75 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N. 1982. Report of the 1981 cooperative Bacillus thuringiensis (B.t.) spray trials. Can. For. Serv. Rep. FPM-X-58. 87 pp.Google Scholar
Morris, O. N., Hildebrand, M. J., and Moore, A.. 1981. Response of the spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Clem.) to graded dosage rates and single versus double applications of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki. Can. For. Serv. Rep. FPM-X-53. 19 pp.Google Scholar
Seymour, K. G. 1969. Evaluation of spray drift potential. In Gould, R. F. (Ed.), Pesticidal Formulations Research. Physical and colloidal chemical aspects. Amer. Chem. Soc. Publ., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar