Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:48:55.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

CHRYSOLINA QUADRIGEMINA (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) INTRODUCED FROM CALIFORNIA TO BRITISH COLUMBIA AGAINST THE WEED HYPERICUM PERFORATUM: COMPARISON OF BEHAVIOUR, PHYSIOLOGY, AND COLOUR IN ASSOCIATION WITH POST-COLONIZATION ADAPTATION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

D. P. Peschken
D. P. Peschken
Affiliation:
Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adults of Chrysolina quadrigemina (Suffr.) from Westbank, British Columbia, were compared with those from Lotus, California, for differences in behaviour, physiology, and colour in association with adaptation to the long, cold winters at the former location. It was found that the Westbank beetles tend to seek shelter more readily from freezing temperatures than do those from California. They also lay more eggs, as measured during 41/2 months of their oviposition period. Most eggs from both populations probably hatch in spring. The proportion of bronze beetles in the total population correlated with high mean and mean minimum temperatures in the coldest months of the year at 11 collection areas in France, Australia, U.S.A., and Canada.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 104 , Issue 11 , November 1972 , pp. 1689 - 1698
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Clark, L. R. 1953. The ecology of Chrysomela gemellata Rossi and C. hyperici Forst., and their effect on St. John's wort in the Bright District, Victoria. Aust. J. Zool. 1: 1–69.Google Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1951. The time factor in biological control. J. econ. Ent. 44: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, C. P. 1956. Biological control of insect pests in the Continental United States. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric., No. 1139.Google Scholar
Davis, C. J. 1970. Recent introductions for biological control in Hawaii — XV. Proc. Hawaii ent. Soc. 20: 521–525.Google Scholar
DeBach, P. 1965. Some biological and economical phenomena associated with colonizing entomophagous insects, pp. 287–329. In Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L. (Eds.), The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York. XV + 588 pp.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, Th. 1933. Geographical variation in lady-beetles. Am. Nat. 67: 97–126.Google Scholar
Embree, D. G. 1965. The population dynamics of the winter moth in Nova Scotia, 1954–1962. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. 1962. Effect of temperature on fecundity and survival of Chrysolina quadrigemina (Suffr.) and C. hyperici (Forst.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Can. Ent. 94: 774–780.Google Scholar
Harris, P., Peschken, D., and Milroy, J.. 1969. The status of biological control of the weed Hypericum perforatum in British Columbia. Can. Ent. 101: 1–15.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. K. 1948. Biological control of Klamath weed. J. econ. Ent. 41: 56–57.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. K. 1964. Projects in biological control of weeds, pp. 650–670. In DeBach, P. (Ed.), Biological control of insect pests and weeds. Reinhold, New York. XXIV + 844 pp.Google Scholar
Holloway, J. K. and Huffaker, C. B.. 1951. The role of Chrysolina gemellata in the biological control of klamath weed. J. econ. Ent. 44: 244–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J. S. (Ed.). 1961. Insect polymorphism. Symp. No. 1, R. ent. Soc. Lond.Google Scholar
Kettlewell, H. B. D. 1961. The phenomenon of industrial melanism in Lepidoptera. A. Rev. Ent. 6: 245–262.Google Scholar
Kiritani, K. 1970. Studies on the adult polymorphism in the southern green stink bug, Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae). Researches Popul. Ecol. Kyoto Univ. 12: 19–34.Google Scholar
Meissner, O. 1911. Die Häufigkeit der Aberrationen von Chrysomela varians Sch. Ent. Bl. Biol. Syst. Käfer 7: 127–128.Google Scholar
Owen, D. F. 1969. Green-brown polymorphism in African Tettigoniidae (Orth.). Revue zool. afr. 80: 346–351.Google Scholar
Pulliainen, E. and Nederström, A.. 1966. Studies on the orientation of Chrysomela varians Schall. (Col., Chrysomelidae). II. Light reactions. Suom. hyönt. Aikak. 32: 58–68.Google Scholar
Rethfeldt, Chr. 1924. Die Viviparität bei Chrysomela varians Schaller. Zool. Jb. 46: 245–302.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G., Roe, A., and Lewontin, R. C.. 1960. Quantitative zoology. (Rev. ed.). Harcourt, New York. VII + 440 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, J. M. 1958. Biological control of Klamath weed, Hypericum perforatum, in British Columbia. Proc. 10th int. Congr. Ent., Vol. 4, pp. 561–565.Google Scholar
Trewartha, G. T. 1954. An introduction to climate. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Walter, H. and Lieth, H.. 1960. Klimadiagramm-Weltatlas. VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
Weisse, J. 1884. Ins. Deutschl. 6(3): 405.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. B. 1968. Polymorphism of Philaenus spumarius (L.) (Homoptera, Cercopidae) in England. J. Anim. Ecol. 37: 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F. 1943. The entomological control of St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum L.) with particular reference to the insect enemies of the weed in southern France. Bull. Coun. Sci. ind. Res. Melb. 169: 5–87.Google Scholar
Wilson, F. 1965. Biological control and the genetics of colonizing species, pp. 307–329. In Baker, H. G. and Stebbins, G. L. (Eds.), The genetics of colonizing species. Academic Press, New York. XV + 588 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, F. and Campbell, T. G.. 1943. Recent progress in the entomological control of St. John's wort. J. Coun. scient. ind. Res. Aust. 16: 45–56.Google Scholar