Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:56:02.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chaoborus sampsera n. sp., a new chaoborid (Diptera: Culicomorpha: Chaoboridae) from Papua Province, Indonesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Joshua R. Ogawa  and
Darlene D. Judd
Joshua R. Ogawa*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Davis Science Building 128, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132, United States of America
Darlene D. Judd
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Davis Science Building 128, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee 37132, United States of America
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new species, Chaoborus sampsera, is described from male and female adults collected from Papua Province in western New Guinea, Indonesia. Based on leg banding, wing pigmentation, and possession of a median paramere sclerite in males, the new species belongs to the Chaoborus “pallidus” group of Colless. Chaoborus sampsera is distinguished from other species of the “pallidus” group by the scimitar-shaped parameres. Although relationships among these Chaoborus species are unclear, there are morphological characters that support the “pallidus” group.

Résumé

Nous décrivons une nouvelle espèce, Chaoborus sampsera, à partir d’adultes mâles et femelles récoltés dans la province de Papua en Nouvelle-Guinée occidentale, Indonésie. Les rayures sur les pattes, la pigmentation de l’aile et la présence d’un sclérite médian sur le paramère du mâle indiquent que la nouvelle espèce appartient au groupe de Chaoborus “pallidus” de Colless. Chaoborus sampsera se distingue des autres espèces du groupe de “pallidus” par ses paramères en forme de cimeterres. Bien que les relations entre ces espèces de Chaoborus ne soient pas claires, il existe des caractères qui appuient l’existence du groupe “pallidus”.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 140 , Issue 3 , June 2008 , pp. 292 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Belkin, J.N. 1962. The mosquitoes of the South Pacific (Diptera, Culicidae). University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
Berendonk, T.U., and Bonsall, M.B. 2002. The phantom midge and a comparison of metapopulation structures. Ecology, 83: 116–128.Google Scholar
Borkent, A. 1979. Systematics and bionomics of the species of the subgenus Schadonophasma Dyar and Shannon (Chaoborus, Chaoboridae, Diptera). Quaestiones Entomologicae, 15: 122–255.Google Scholar
Borkent, A. 1993. A world catalog of fossil and extant Corethrellidae and Chaoboridae (Diptera), with a listing of references to keys, bionomic information, and descriptions of each known life stage. Entomology Scandinavica, 24: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colless, D.H. 1986. The Australian Chaoboridae (Diptera). Australian Journal of Zoology, Supplemental Series, 124: 1–66.Google Scholar
Harbach, R.E., and Knight, K.L. 1980. Taxonomists' glossary of mosquito anatomy. Plexus Publishing Inc., Marlton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
McAlpine, J.F., Peterson, B.V., Shewell, G.E., Teskey, H.J., Vockeroth, J.R., and Wood, D.M. 1981. Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Canadian Government Publishing Centre, Quebec.Google Scholar
Ogawa, J.R. 2007. Phylogeny of the “chaoboriform” genera. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University, Corvallis. Papua Insect Foundation. 2007. Geographic names and coordinates of Papua Indonesia [online]. Available from http://www.papua-insects.nl/gazetteer/gazetteer.htm [accessed 3 February 2008].Google Scholar
Sæther, O.A. 1970. Nearctic and Palaearctic Chaoborus (Diptera: Chaoboridae). Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 174: 1–57.Google Scholar
Sæther, O.A. 2002. Chaoboridae, phantom midges. In Süsswasserfauna von Mitteleuropa 21/10. Edited by Schwoerbel, J. and Zwick, P.. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany. pp. 1–38.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B.J. 2000. Morphology and terminology of Diptera male genitalia. In Contributions to a manual of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol. 1. General and applied dipterology. Edited by Papp, L. and Darvas, B.. Science Herald, Budapest, Hungary. pp. 53–74.Google Scholar
Sinclair, B.J., Borkent, A., and Wood, D.M. 2007. The male genital tract and aedeagal components of the Diptera with a discussion of their phylogenetic significance. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 150: 711–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, D.M. 1991. Homology and phylogenetic implications of male genitalia in Diptera: the ground plan. In Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Dipterology, Bratislava, Slovakia, 27 August – 1 September 1990. Edited by Weismann, L., Orszagh, I., and Pont, A.C.. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, the Netherlands. pp. 255–284.Google Scholar
Van der Heijden, P. 2004. Hollandia (Schoolatlas van Nieuw Guinea door drs. H. Eggink, W. versluys NV, Amsterdam, 1956) [online]. Available from http://www.vanderheijden.org/ng/maps/Hollandia.jpg [accessed 3 February 2008].Google Scholar
Vlaardingerbroek, B. 1984. Notes on freshwater zoo-plankton found in Central Province, Papua New Guinea, 1981–2. Royal Society of New South Wales Journal and Proceedings 117: 63–66.Google Scholar