Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:55:03.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BIOSYSTEMATICS OF THE GENUS IPS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) IN NORTH AMERICA. HOPPING’S GROUP III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. N. Lanier*
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Forestry, Calgary, Alberta

Abstract

Ips integer (Eichhoff) is removed from synonymy with plastographus (Leconte), which in turn is divided into two subspecies: p. plastographus (Leconte) and p. maritimus n. subsp. The former occurs in the subalpine zone of the Sierra Nevada, Cascade, and northern Rocky Mountain ranges; the latter is apparently restricted to the California coast.I. integer and p. plastographus are partially sympatric, but even in a mixed attack on the same host the two species were rarely found in the same gallery systems. In field experiments females showed strong preference for the sex pheromone of conspecific males. Laboratory-produced hybrid males were intermediately attractive to both species.In breeding experiments the plastographus subspecies were fully interfertile but fertility of backcross and F2 generations was reduced. Egg hatchability was low in interspecific combinations of integer and plastographus. However, results were different for the reciprocal pairings and the backcrosses showed increased fertility. These data defy explanation by nuclear genetics but may result from cytoplasmic incompatibility.Although integer and the two plastographus subspecies have the same karyotypic formula, 15 A A + Xyp, the three entities can be differentiated by the size of heteropycnotic segments in pachytene chromosomes and the shapes (centromere position) of some of the five largest chromosomes at second metaphase. Univalents, multivalents, bridged anaphases, and other abnormalities were common in hybrids of plastographus and integer. Heteromorphic bivalents, but no other abnormalities, were observed in hybrids of the plastographus subspecies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barr, B. A. 1969. Sound production in Scolytidae (Coleoptera) with emphasis on the genus Ips. Can. Ent. 101: 636672.10.4039/Ent101636-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blandford, W. F. H. 1895. Biologia Central-Americana, Insecta, Scolytidae. Vol. 4, pp. 81289.Google Scholar
Blandford, W. F. H. 1898. The identity of Xyleborus affinis with some synonymical notes. Ent. News 9: 36.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, W. J. 1939. The bark and timber beetles of North America. Ore. St. Coll. Coop. Assoc., Corvallis.Google Scholar
Chamberlin, W. J. 1958. The Scolytoidea of the Northwest: Oregon, Washington, Idaho, British Columbia. Ore. St. Monog. Stud. Ent. No. 2.Google Scholar
Doane, R. W., et al. 1936. Forest insects. McGraw Hill, New York and London.Google Scholar
Eaton, C. B., and Lara, R. R.. 1967. California pine engraver, Ips (integer) plastographus (Le Conte), pp. 2526. In Important forest insects and diseases of mutual concern to Canada, the United States and Mexico. Queen's Printer, Ottawa.Google Scholar
Eggers, H. 1929. Zur Synonynie der Borkenkafer. Wien. ent. Ztg 46: 4155.Google Scholar
Eichhoff, W. 1869. Neue Amerikanische Borkenkafer Gattung und Arten. Berl. ent. Z. 12: 273280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eichhoff, W. 1879. Ratio descripto, emendato, eorum Tomicinorum. Mém. Soc. r. sci. Liege.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A. D. 1905. Notes on some Mexican Scolytidae with descriptions of some new species. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 7: 7179.Google Scholar
Hopping, G. R. 1963 a. The natural groups of species in the genus Ips De Geer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in North America. Can. Ent. 95: 508516.10.4039/Ent95508-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopping, G. R. 1963 b. The North American species in groups II and III of Ips De Geer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 95: 12021210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, P. C. 1954. A hibernation record of Ips plastographus Leconte (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 86: 431432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, F. P. 1953. Insect enemies of western forests. U.S. Dep. Agric. Misc. Publ. 273. (2nd ed.)Google Scholar
Lanier, G. N. 1966. Interspecific mating and cytological studies of closely related species of Ips De Geer and Orthotomicus Farrari (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 98: 175188.10.4039/Ent98175-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, G. N. 1967. Ips plastographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) tunneling in sapwood of lodgepole pine in California. Can. Ent. 99: 13341335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, G. N. 1970 a. Sex pheromones: abolition of specificity in hybrid bark beetles. Science (in press).Google Scholar
Lanier, G. N. 1970 b. Biosystematics of North American Ips (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Hopping's group IX. Can. Ent. 102: 11391163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanier, G. N., and Cameron, A. E.. 1969. Secondary sex characters in the North American species of the genus Ips De Geer (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 101: 862870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leconte, J. L. 1868. Synopsis of Scolytidae of North America (taxonomic). Discussion, keys to species, 19 genera, 96 species. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 2: 150178.Google Scholar
Leconte, J. L. 1876. Family IX. Scolytidae. In Leconte, J. L. and Horn, G. H., The Rhynchophora of America north of Mexico. Proc. Am. philos. Soc. 15: 341391.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1969 a. Review of holartic tarsonemid mites (Acarina: Prostigmata) parasitizing eggs of ipine bark beetles. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 60.10.4039/entm10160fvCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. E. 1969 b. New species of Tarsonemus (Acarina: Tarsonemidae) associated with bark beetles. Can. Ent. 101: 12911314.10.4039/Ent1011291-12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindquist, E. E., and Bedard, W. D.. 1961. Biology and taxonomy of mites of the genus Tarsonemoides (Acarina: Tarsonemidae) parasitizing eggs of bark beetles of the genus Ips. Can. Ent. 93: 982999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, G. K., and Hatch, M. H.. 1945. An annotated list of the Scolytidae of Washington. Univ. Wash. Publ. Biol. 10: 145156.Google Scholar
Robertson, W. R. B. 1916. Chromosome studies I. J. Morphol. Physiol. 27: 179331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schedl, K. E. 1939. Scolytidae, Coptonotidae y Platypodidae Mexicanos. An. Esc. nac. Cienc. Biol. 1: 317379.Google Scholar
Schedl, K. E. 1955. Die Kiefern-Borkenkafer Guatemalas. Z. angew. Ent. 38: 148.10.1111/j.1439-0418.1956.tb01589.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwerdtfeger, F. 1956. Scolytidae (Col.) an Pinus-Arten in Mittelamerika. I: Das Genus Ips De Geer. Z. angew. Ent. 39: 3457.10.1111/j.1439-0418.1956.tb01241.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1959. The cytogenetic basis of speciation in Coleoptera. Proc. X int. Congr. Genet., Vol. 1, pp. 444450.Google Scholar
Smith, S. G. 1965. Heterochromatin, colchicine, and karyotype. Chromosoma 16: 162165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swaine, J. M. 1909. Catalogue of the described Scolytidae of America, north of Mexico. Appendix B. In 24th report of the state Entomologist on injurious and other insects of the state of New York. N.Y. St. Mus. Bull. 134: 76159.Google Scholar
Swaine, J. M. 1918. Canadian bark beetles. II: A preliminary classification, with an account of the habits and means of control. Tech. Bull. Can. Dep. Agric., No. 14.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. B. 1966. Some Scolytidae from the Sierra Madre Occidental in Mexico. Can. Ent. 98: 871875.10.4039/Ent98871-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J. B. 1967. A comparative study of gastric caeca in adult and larval stages of bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Proc. ent. Soc. Ont., Vol. 97, pp. 7190.Google Scholar
Trimble, F. M. 1924. Life history and habits of two Pacific Coast bark beetles. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 17: 382391.10.1093/aesa/17.4.382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, S. L. 1957. Distributional notes on and synonymies of some North American Scolytidae (Coleoptera). Can. Ent. 80: 396403.10.4039/Ent89396-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar