Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:34:48.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BIOLOGY OF SULPHURETYLENCHUS ELONGATUS (NEMATODA: SPHAERULARIIDAE), AND ITS EFFECT ON ITS HOST, SCOLYTUS VENTRALIS (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

M. Ashraf
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Pullman
A. A. Berryman
Affiliation:
Washington State University, Pullman

Abstract

The developmental stages of Sulphuretylenchus elongatus, an abundant nematode parasite of Scolytus ventralis, are described. The life cycle was generally synchronized with its host, nematode reproduction usually occurring in the adult beetle after it had attacked a new tree. Reproduction occasionally occurred in the host larva. In these cases encapsulation of some nematode eggs and larvae was observed and the host usually died. Free-living infective stage nematodes emerged from the host, mated in the bark beetle galleries, and the female nematode reinfected bark beetle larvae by penetrating the cuticle.Parasitism by S. elongatus caused delayed emergence, limited flight, and aberrant attack behavior by infected S. ventralis. Female bark beetles were sterilized by heavy infection and partially sterilized by light or moderate infection. The effects of parasitism on males was not as severe. Some egg and larval mortality was attributed to nematode attack, and adult survival was reduced by infection.Parasitism was slightly higher in female bark beetles. The incidence of parasitism decreased somewhat in the upper levels of the tree. Host density appeared to have little effect on per cent parasitism although the degree of super-parasitism increased with host density.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashraf, M., and Berryman, A. A.. 1969. Biology of Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) attacking Abies grandis in northern Idaho. Melanderia 2: 123.Google Scholar
Atkins, M. D. 1961. A study of the flight of the Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk., 3. Flight capacity. Can. Ent. 93: 467474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berryman, A. A. 1968. Development of sampling techniques and life tables for the fir engraver, Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Can. Ent. 100: 11381147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronskill, J. F. 1962. Encapsulation of rhabditoid nematodes in mosquitoes. Can. J. Zool. 40: 12691275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couturier, A. 1963. Recherches sur des Mermithidae nématodes parasites du hanneton commun (Melolontha melolontha L.). Annls Épiphyt. 14: 203267.Google Scholar
Dale, P. S. 1967. Nematodes associated with the pine-bark beetle, Hylastes ater, in New Zealand. N.Z. J. Sci. 10: 222234.Google Scholar
Hocking, H. 1967. A nematode (Deladenus sp.: Neotylenchidae) associated with Rhyssa spp. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), parasites of siricid woodwasps. J. Aust. ent. Soc. 6: 5256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humason, G. L. 1967. Animal tissue techniques. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Massey, C. L. 1956. Nematode parasites and associates of the Engelmann spruce beetle (Dendroctonus engelmanni Hopk.). Proc. Helminth. Soc. Wash. 23: 1424.Google Scholar
Massey, C. L. 1958. Four new species of Parasitylenchus (Nematoda) from scolytid beetles. Proc. Helminth. Soc. Wash. 25: 2630.Google Scholar
Massey, C. L. 1960. Nematode parasites and associates of the California five-spined engraver. Ips confusus (LeC.). Proc. Helminth. Soc. Wash. 27: 1422.Google Scholar
Massey, C. L. 1962. Life history of Aphelenchulus elongatus Massey (Nematoda), an endoparasite of Ips confusus LeConte, with a description of the male. J. Insect Path. 4: 95103.Google Scholar
Massey, C. L. 1964. The nematode parasites and associates of the fir engraver beetle, Scolytus ventralis LeConte, in New Mexico. J. Insect Path. 6: 133155.Google Scholar
Massey, C. L. 1966. The influence of nematode parasites and associates on bark beetles in the United States. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 12: 381386.Google Scholar
Nickle, W. R. 1963. Observations on the effect of nematodes on Ips confusus (LeConte) and other bark beetles. J. Insect Path. 5: 386389.Google Scholar
Nickle, W. R. 1967. On the classification of the insect parasitic nematodes of the Sphaerulariidae Lubbock, 1861 (Tylenchoidea: Nematoda). Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash. 34: 7294.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. N. 1930. On the infestation of elm bark beetles (Scolytidae) by a nematode, Parasitylenchus scolyti n. sp. J. Helminth. 8: 239248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palm, N. B. 1948. Normal and pathological histology of the ovaries in Bombus Latr. with notes on the hormonal interrelations between the ovaries and the corpora allata. Opusc. ent., Suppl. 7.Google Scholar
Poinar, G. O. Jr., 1965. The bionomics and parasitic development of Tripius sciarae (Bovien) (Sphaerulariidae: Aphelenchoidea), a nematode parasite of sciarid flies (Sciaridae: Diptera). Parasitology 55: 559569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G. O. Jr., and Doncaster, C. C.. 1965. The penetration of Tripius sciarae (Bovien) (Sphaerulariidae: Aphelenchoidea) into its insect host, Bradysia paupera Tuom. (Mycetophilidae: Diptera). Nematologica 11: 7378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinar, G. O. Jr., and Gyrisco, G. G.. 1962. A new mermithid parasite of the alfalfa weevil, Hypera postica (Gyllenhal). J. Insect Path. 4: 201206.Google Scholar
Pouvreau, A. 1962. Contribution à l'étude de Sphaerularia bombi, parasite des reines de Bourdons. Annls Abeille 5: 181199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puttler, B. 1961. Biology of Hyposoter exiguae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), a parasite of lepidopterous larvae. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54: 2530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1958. Nematodes associated with the mountain pine beetle. Can. Dep. Agric. Forest Biology Div. Bi-mon. Progr. Rept. 14 (1): 3.Google Scholar
Salt, G. 1963. The defense reactions of insects to metazoan parasites. Parasitology 53: 527642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, J. L., and Norris, D. M. Jr., 1961. Nematode parasites and associates of the smaller European Elm bark beetle, Scolytus multistriatus (Marsham). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 54: 792798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmiege, D. C. 1963. The feasibility of using a Neoaplectanid nematode for control of some forest insect pests. J. econ. Ent. 56: 427431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, F. 1950. Die Abwehrreaktion des Insektenblutes und ihre Beeinflussung durch die parasiten. Vjschr. naturf. Ges. Zürich 95: 2244.Google Scholar
Schvester, D. 1957. Contribution à l'étude de Coléoptères scolytids. Annls Épiphyt. (C).Google Scholar
Weis-Fogh, T. 1956. Biology and physics of locust flight. 2. Flight performance of the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria). Trans. phil. R. Soc. Lond. (B) 239: 459510.Google Scholar
Welch, H. E. 1959. Taxonomy, life cycle, development, and habits of two new species of Allantonematidae (Nematoda) parasitic in drosophilid flies. Parasitology 49: 83103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welch, H. E. 1960. Hydromermis churchillensis n. sp. (Nematoda: Mermithidae) a parasite of Aedes communis (DeG.) from Churchill, Manitoba, with observations of its incidence and bionomics. Can. J. Zool. 38: 465474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, H. E. 1965. Entomophilic nematodes. Ann. Rev. Ent. 10: 275302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welch, H. E., and Bronskill, J. F.. 1962. Parasitism of mosquito larvae by the nematode, DD 136. Can. J. Zool. 40: 12631268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wülker, W. 1961. Untersuchungen über die intersexualität der Chironomiden nach paramermis-infektion. Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 25: 127181.Google Scholar